Is there anything that God could do, or let happen, whose negative consequences, from a human perspsctive, would be so bad, that His perfect goodness would be legitimately called into question?

Originally posted by Pawnokeyhole
Is there anything that God could do, or let happen, whose negative consequences, from a human perspsctive, would be so bad, that His perfect goodness would be legitimately called into question?

Originally posted by Mad Mac MacMad
He'd have to exist first, for the question to be valid

Originally posted by Pawnokeyhole
Is there anything that God could do, or let happen, whose negative consequences, from a human perspsctive, would be so bad, that His perfect goodness would be legitimately called into question?

Originally posted by Pawnokeyhole
Is there anything that God could do, or let happen, whose negative consequences, from a human perspsctive, would be so bad, that His perfect goodness would be legitimately called into question?

Originally posted by agryson
The circular argumentation used by those who believe in God would say no because then he would not be all-loving, but by that token he would neither be all-powerful. Seems he's put himself in a bit of a bind.

Originally posted by Pawnokeyhole
Is there anything that God could do, or let happen, whose negative consequences, from a human perspsctive, would be so bad, that His perfect goodness would be legitimately called into question?

Originally posted by whodey
So to be all loving one must be all controlling? Perhaps you want him to control you? Now thats what I call love!!

Originally posted by AThousandYoung
I think of it like tackling a loved one when the automatic fire starts in a drive by. That's forcing the person, and it's love.

It seems to me that Christians are obligated to let their children die to bullets, drowning, electricity, whatever rather than protect them, since "controlling others" is supposedly so awful in Christianity.

Are you fa ...[text shortened]... AT important to him.

(Examples - http://skepticsannotatedbible.com/contra/hardened.html)

Originally posted by whodey
No doubt, not controlling others is a messy business. In fact, love is a messy proposition. Don't tell me you have never been hurt....or are you the heart breaker?

As far as Pharoah goes, he had already made his decision when he continued to force the Israelites to be slaves. God was simply making an example of him openly.

Originally posted by AThousandYoung
That's not what the Bible says (for the most part) according to the translations I've seen. How did you come to this interpretation? According to Exodus, God forced Pharoah not to let the Israelites go by hardening his heart.

1 Samuel 6:6 seems to agree with you, but Exodus in many places does not.

Originally posted by whodey
What I am saying is that the Pharoah did not want the Israelites to go free. Why should he? They were free labor. You might say that God was simply forcing him to uphold his own free will despite the plagues.

Originally posted by whodey
What I am saying is that the Pharoah did not want the Israelites to go free. Why should he? They were free labor. You might say that God was simply forcing him to uphold his own free will despite the plagues.

Originally posted by whodey
What I am saying is that the Pharoah did not want the Israelites to go free. Why should he? They were free labor. You might say that God was simply forcing him to uphold his own free will despite the plagues.

perhaps if Pharoah had let the Isrealites go on the first asking, the people of Egypt would have attacked them as they fled, instead the plagues were visited on them, thus breaking their spirit and making it safe for them to leave.