Originally posted by @divegeesterThe difference here is that you cannot just state your case and move on, you have to verbally thrash people over and over and over and over, across many threads, JUST for the 'high crime' of disagreeing with you.
To each our own kind sonship.
You know it never fails to astonish me how you, some other others and especially of course Suzanne deliberately conflate open argument with "bullying", in a forum where passionately held views are obviously going to be fiercely defended through rigourous exchanges.
Originally posted by @dj2beckerHe's been asked this before. He couldn't or wouldn't say then, either.
What are you then?
Originally posted by @suzianneWhat is it you see yourself doing when you say to divegeester something along the lines of what you say in the above comment and do so hundreds of times every year, year after year? Is it an example of you "stating your case and moving on"?
The difference here is that you cannot just state your case and move on, you have to verbally thrash people over and over and over and over, across many threads, JUST for the 'high crime' of disagreeing with you.
Originally posted by @suzianne to @divegeesterNever mind, I see exactly where you get it from.
The difference here is that you cannot just state your case and move on, you have to verbally thrash people over and over and over and over, across many threads, JUST for the 'high crime' of disagreeing with you.
Originally posted by @suzianneYou aim the same little scornful off-topic spake at me too, hundreds and hundreds of times too. Don't you ever pause for thought and wonder whether the way you behave in repeatedly reprimanding divegeester in the same way, for the same reason, regardless of the topic, ad nauseam, might perhaps be making you seem a bit hypocritical?
Never mind, I see exactly where you get it from.
Originally posted by @dj2beckerIf man was truly honest with himself (or herself) and boldly embraced "I don't know," they would be spared the whole botheration of having to invent a deity to provide reassuring answers.
His go to words for questions he doesn't want to answer seem to be "I don't know".
09 Sep 17
Originally posted by @ghost-of-a-dukeYea, I agree those deities we invent worthless.
If man was truly honest with himself (or herself) and boldly embraced "I don't know," they would be spared the whole botheration of having to invent a deity to provide reassuring answers.
09 Sep 17
Originally posted by @suzianneAre you suggesting that repeatedly disagreeing with people across different topics and different threads is bullying?
The difference here is that you cannot just state your case and move on, you have to verbally thrash people over and over and over and over, across many threads, JUST for the 'high crime' of disagreeing with you.
Originally posted by @dj2beckerYou asked me a question and I didn't know the answer. I don't know what one of the types of Christians which you asked me if am, is.
His go to words for questions he doesn't want to answer seem to be "I don't know".
10 Sep 17
Originally posted by @divegeesterYou have yet to respond to the OP. Is your answer to that also I don't know?
You asked me a question and I didn't know the answer. I don't know what one of the types of Christians which you asked me if am, is.
10 Sep 17
Originally posted by @dj2beckerNo wonder we don't get along.
It would explain a lot if he was a Unitarian Universalist.
I'm a Bitarian Galaxian.
10 Sep 17
Originally posted by @dj2beckerI don't care what you think, I have next to zero interest in you.
You have yet to respond to the OP. Is your answer to that also I don't know?
Originally posted by @whodeyWhat you are whodey is another out of the box unprincipled poster who holds quite nasty political and religious views and who like to drop metaphorical farts in the various forums and then be facitious about it.
No wonder we don't get along.
I'm a Bitarian Galaxian.