Originally posted by Proper Knob
My post should've been a 'reply and quote' to Dasa.

ok i was wondering 😀

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
How have i made a fool of myself for liking his comment, you have not said.

I thought it unnecessary to say. His comment was stupid and I assumed you knew that.

i told you i don't believe your propaganda, its nonsense.
What propaganda? And when did you tell me? I don't recall.

So, are you willing to discuss what you liked about his comment? I thought not.

Originally posted by twhitehead
I thought it unnecessary to say. His comment was stupid and I assumed you knew that.

[b] i told you i don't believe your propaganda, its nonsense.
What propaganda? And when did you tell me? I don't recall.

So, are you willing to discuss what you liked about his comment? I thought not.[/b]

I liked the way it was worded!

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
I liked the way it was worded!

What about the way it was worded?

And what about the actual contents? What did you like about them? Did you agree with them?

Originally posted by Proper Knob
The whole purpose of this forum is to 'debate and discuss', that's the description in the forum title. Go and read it. To then claim - 'I am the only person in this forum who declares to not want debate and argumentation' - makes you come across as a tad silly, to put it mildly. Claiming you don't want to debate in a forum specifically created for 'debating' is like saying you want to go swimming but don't want to get wet.

You just said it (debate and discuss)

I said also I want to discuss but (not debate and argue.)

And why did I say that?

Because truth cannot be argued and debated..............full stop.

Originally posted by Dasa
Because truth cannot be argued and debated..............full stop.

I would argue that the truth can be argued and debated. And that is the truth. And I just argued it, proving you wrong. Do you wish to debate my claim?

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
Robbie v Sonhouse +3=1, thats the answer to all propositions that matter! 😛

I goofed, I responded to the wrong comment, I was responding to the comment about Dasa. Sorry for confusion. The P word? Proof. He hates to be confronted with even the concept of people demanding proof of his religion.

You notice he said he will 'dicuss' but not 'debate'.

That would be because he is so addled in his religion NOBODY else matters, he is the ONLY one qualified to tell the 'truth'.

Anyone saying anything disparaging about his religion is automatically defeated in his somewhat limited mind.

It is just another example of why I think ALL religions are just man made constructs designed to control people with little else going on.

Originally posted by Dasa
Are you blind?

I am the only person in this forum who declares to not want debate and argumentation.

And why is that?

Because spiritual truth cannot be debated and argued........but only discussed and no one wants discussion.

And why do they not want discussion?

Because they do not know the difference between true religion and false religion.

...[text shortened]... ir lack of humility to make enquiry.

Baiting and sarcastic questions, is not sincere enquiry.

you don't call an apprentice (mechanic) "defeated". They are still learning.

Originally posted by karoly aczel
you don't call an apprentice (mechanic) "defeated". They are still learning.

Dasa peddles what amounts to a kind of perpetual motion machine that exists only on paper. I don't think he is a "mechanic", and I certainly don't think anyone here is his "apprentice", unless that's how you see yourself. 😉

Originally posted by FMF
Dasa peddles what amounts to a kind of perpetual motion machine that exists only on paper. I don't think he is a "mechanic", and I certainly don't think anyone here is his "apprentice", unless that's how you see yourself. 😉

No Dasa's not a 'mechanic'.

....

I do see myself as an apprentice of sorts - even though my main authority comes from myself. I have studied under a couple of "masters" in my time. But none right now or the last few years. I don't seek them

Originally posted by karoly aczel
No Dasa's not a 'mechanic'.

....

I do see myself as an apprentice of sorts - even though my main authority comes from myself. I have studied under a couple of "masters" in my time. But none right now or the last few years. I don't seek them

Your fired

Originally posted by Proper Knob
The whole purpose of this forum is to 'debate and discuss', that's the description in the forum title. Go and read it. To then claim - 'I am the only person in this forum who declares to not want debate and argumentation' - makes you come across as a tad silly, to put it mildly. Claiming you don't want to debate in a forum specifically created for 'debating' is like saying you want to go swimming but don't want to get wet.

There is a forum specifically for debating.

You cannot debate truth.

Debating requires a For and Against.

Its a tad silly having a For and Against something that is true.

Who shall ever want to be the person debating the ""Against .......of the truth.

Its easy being the person being for the ( "For" ) side.

Do you understand now?

Therefore again, the truth can only be discussed.............. full stop.

Originally posted by Dasa
There is a forum specifically for debating.

You cannot debate truth.

Debating requires a For and Against.

Its a tad silly having a For and Against something that is true.

Who shall ever want to be the person debating the ""Against .......of the truth.

Its easy being the person being for the ( "For" ) side.

Do you understand now?

Therefore again, the truth can only be discussed.............. full stop.

But again, why is only what you say 'the truth?!?'

As an atheist i believe 'i' hold the truth. By your own reckoning you can only discuss this with me,....as you can not debate the truth.

Or is it only okay to 'debate' the truths of other, but not your own?

Originally posted by Ghost of a Duke
But again, why is only what you say 'the truth?!?'

As an atheist i believe 'i' hold the truth. By your own reckoning you can only discuss this with me,....as you can not debate the truth.

Or is it only okay to 'debate' the truths of other, but not your own?

I think Dasas point is that the truth does not lie between two polarities.

Originally posted by Dasa
Its a tad silly having a For and Against something that is true.

It is only silly when all agree on what is true. Given that you and I disagree on what is true, debate makes a lot of sense and is not silly at all.

Who shall ever want to be the person debating the ""Against .......of the truth.
Clearly not you, which is why you prefer to merely state your untruths rather than debate them.