Attack on Salman Rushdie

Attack on Salman Rushdie

Spirituality

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.

F

Joined
28 Oct 05
Moves
34587
14 Aug 22

In your view, if the attack on Salman Rushdie is what God wanted, is it righteous?

Cryptic

Behind the scenes

Joined
27 Jun 16
Moves
3095
14 Aug 22

@fmf said
In your view, if the attack on Salman Rushdie is what God wanted, is it righteous?
IMHO - There is no way of knowing if the attack on Salman Rushdie is what God wanted or not, because of this, the question of its righteousness cannot be determined.

F

Joined
28 Oct 05
Moves
34587
14 Aug 22

@mchill said
IMHO - There is no way of knowing if the attack on Salman Rushdie is what God wanted or not, because of this, the question of its righteousness cannot be determined.
If the attacker believed he was simply carrying out his God figure's will, was the man's motive pure

Cryptic

Behind the scenes

Joined
27 Jun 16
Moves
3095
14 Aug 22

@fmf said
If the attacker believed he was simply carrying out his God figure's will, was the man's motive pure
I doubt it. There are very few circumstances in either the Quran or the Bible that suggests attacking or killing another was to be considered an act of carrying out God will, and many that advocate God should be the judge, jury and (if necessary) executioner.

F

Joined
28 Oct 05
Moves
34587
14 Aug 22

@mchill said
I doubt it. There are very few circumstances in either the Quran or the Bible that suggests attacking or killing another was to be considered an act of carrying out God will, and many that advocate God should be the judge, jury and (if necessary) executioner.
There are very few circumstances in [...] the Quran [...] that suggest attacking or killing another was to be considered an act of carrying out God will.

Gosh. You reckon?

Über-Nerd

Joined
31 May 12
Moves
8328
14 Aug 22

@fmf said
There are very few circumstances in [...] the Quran [...] that suggest attacking or killing another was to be considered an act of carrying out God will.

Gosh. You reckon?
Abraham and Isaac, for example. But that was to test Abraham’s faith, not get Isaac killed. I doubt that the assailant in Rushdie’s case was being tested by God.

Joined
16 Feb 08
Moves
116984
14 Aug 22

@mchill said
I doubt it. There are very few circumstances in either the Quran or the Bible that suggests attacking or killing another was to be considered an act of carrying out God will, and many that advocate God should be the judge, jury and (if necessary) executioner.
KellyJay believes it is God’s will for the state to execute people for certain crimes.

Joined
06 May 15
Moves
27444
18 Aug 22

@divegeester said
KellyJay believes it is God’s will for the state to execute people for certain crimes.
Do you believe that you are one of God's tests for the rest of us?

Joined
16 Feb 08
Moves
116984
18 Aug 22

@kevin-eleven said
Do you believe that you are one of God's tests for the rest of us?
You seem upset in this thread too.

Joined
16 Feb 08
Moves
116984
21 Aug 22

@kevin-eleven said
Do you believe that you are one of God's tests for the rest of us?
I believe my presence here gives you your daily boner.

Civis Americanus Sum

New York

Joined
26 Dec 07
Moves
17585
22 Aug 22

@mchill said
I doubt it. There are very few circumstances in either the Quran or the Bible that suggests attacking or killing another was to be considered an act of carrying out God will, and many that advocate God should be the judge, jury and (if necessary) executioner.
Are you serious?

I don't know about the Quran, but the Bible is chock full of righteous murders in God's name and for God's will.

S. Korea

Joined
03 Jun 17
Moves
41191
15 Sep 22

@fmf said
In your view, if the attack on Salman Rushdie is what God wanted, is it righteous?
While bad things do occur due to the free will of men being exercised in a sinful and improper way, the contention would be that these things can still be a means of repentance for the people involved, and anything which can be used to learn and grow is not without benefit.

I understand that some people would find this radical - some people want to literally "Oh no, bad thing. Guess <everything is ruined> and <there's no lesson here for anyone.>" But, nah, I think every instance, even ones that went unwitnessed but can be thought of in terms of abstractions or parallels, can serve as a means of repentance and as a means of motivation for better rectification of the self, and better treatment of others.

F

Joined
28 Oct 05
Moves
34587
15 Sep 22

@philokalia said
While bad things do occur due to the free will of men being exercised in a sinful and improper way, the contention would be that these things can still be a means of repentance for the people involved, and anything which can be used to learn and grow is not without benefit.

I understand that some people would find this radical - some people want to literally "Oh ...[text shortened]... e and as a means of motivation for better rectification of the self, and better treatment of others.
An answer to the OP question would have been more interesting.

Insanity at Masada

tinyurl.com/mw7txe34

Joined
23 Aug 04
Moves
26660
18 Sep 22

@mchill said
I doubt it. There are very few circumstances in either the Quran or the Bible that suggests attacking or killing another was to be considered an act of carrying out God will, and many that advocate God should be the judge, jury and (if necessary) executioner.
https://thebiblesays.com/commentary/exod/exod-32/exodus-3225-29/

Exodus 32:25-29

Moses then told the Levites,“Thus says the Lord, the God of Israel, ‘Every man of you put his sword upon his thigh, and go back and forth from gate to gate in the camp, and kill every man his brother, and every man his friend, and every man his neighbor.’”