21 Apr '19 12:35>
@sonship saidWho are you quoting here? You have put words between quotation marks.
No, I never argued "Everyone who DIES for a cause, must have died for a cause which is the truth."
@sonship saidWho are you quoting here? You have put words between quotation marks.
No, I never argued "Everyone who DIES for a cause, must have died for a cause which is the truth."
@sonship saidNo, I have said no such thing. You are making this up.
So, we have here from you that people dying for a cause is protection for the sinner in knowing that Argumentum ad Martyrdom fortifies their unrepentance against Jesus Christ.
Perhaps in the same place you keep your joy when you are accusing people of being heretics, of spreading faeces and when you are discussing how you justify the eternal torture of billions of people for thought crimes.
@sonship saidI think this self-justification is untrue.
The harshest things I have written on this Forum were always at PROVOCATION of a extremely insulting nature towards me first.
@sonship saidThere is no "animal excrement" aspect to my ideas or my beliefs. But the idea of billions of people being tortured is the very core, the very moral essence, of your beliefs.
Feces or Billions tortured.
@sonship saidIf you can link this to argumentum ad martyrdom, I'll take a shot at giving an answer.
Do you think anywhere in the world someone is doing something that they should not be doing?
There is no "animal excrement" aspect to my ideas or my beliefs. But the idea of billions of people being tortured is the very core, the very moral essence, of your beliefs.
@sonship saidThe essence of my belief is salvation through Christ.
The essence of my belief is through Christ.
@fmf saidSo you think it makes more sense that God would sacrifice his own Son on the cross to save us from nothing at all?
The essence of my belief is salvation through Christ.
No it isn't. You have described eternal torture of non-believers as "the ultimate morality" and "perfect justice". You have pointedly never referred to "salvation" as eithet of these things. Therefore, it is the angry vengeful torture of non-believers which - with its "perfect" and "ultimate" nature - that lies at the very heart of your ideology and it is your message for billions of non-Christians like me.
@dj2becker saidChrist died so that ALL who believe [in his teachings], can have eternal life.
So you think it makes more sense that God would sacrifice his own Son on the cross to save us from nothing at all?
@suzianne saidExactly. Different people have different motivations.
Yes, but the pilots need not have believed it to be so.
Perhaps they felt they were giving their lives for what they believed was a greater good, their country, and to help ensure its survival. Perhaps they were giving their lives for their fellow Japanese, no "emperor god" needed. Did everyone who gave their lives in every battle ever fought believe their leader was a god? Demonstrably not.
@rajk999 saidFollowing his commands is also proof that you believe in Him!
Christ died so that ALL who believe [in his teachings], can have eternal life.
Proof that one believes in his teachings is by the following of His commandments
No it isn't. You have described eternal torture of non-believers as "the ultimate morality" and "perfect justice". You have pointedly never referred to "salvation" as eithet of these things. Therefore, it is the angry vengeful torture of non-believers which - with its "perfect" and "ultimate" nature - that lies at the very heart of your ideology and it is your message for billions of non-Christians like me.