Spirituality
31 Jan 17
Originally posted by chaney3Give me some examples of this supposed "ridicule".
Loss of belief is much different than ridiculing those who hold the same belief that you yourself once held.
You are a hypocrite.
And what definition of "hypocrite" are you using? Copy paste a definition here that you think applies to my contributions, as a non-Christian, to this debate and discussion forum.
03 Feb 17
Originally posted by FMFNo need to copy paste.
Give me some examples of this supposed "ridicule".
And what definition of "hypocrite" are you using? Copy paste a definition here that you think applies to my contributions, as a non-Christian, to this debate and discussion forum.
You once believed in God, and Jesus. You turned your back on those beliefs.
Now, when speaking to believers, you refer to those past beliefs as 'God figures'.
You should actually keep your mouth shut and show a little humility. But you don't.
Originally posted by chaney3I think there is a need for you to substantiate what you've claimed. Give me an example of something I put forward which was ~ in your view ~ not me endeavouring to discuss something or espouse a point of view, but was, instead, "ridicule".
No need to copy paste.
Originally posted by FMF"God figure".
I think there is a need for you to substantiate what you've claimed. Give me an example of something I put forward which was ~ in your view ~ not me endeavouring to discuss something or espouse a point of view, but was, instead, "ridicule".
Your term. The same God you have come to reject.
Originally posted by chaney3I don't claim to know. You said to me "You should actually keep your mouth shut and show a little humility", and yet when it comes to conjecture about the "origin of life", I do - for all intents and purposes - 'keep my mouth shut'. So, go on then, what "hypocrisy" is it you think I am guilty of?
Explain origin of life.
FMF: Give me an example of something I put forward which was ~ in your view ~ not me endeavouring to discuss something or espouse a point of view, but was, instead, "ridicule".Yes, I use the term "god figure", but what objection do you have to it? It's surely about as neutral a term as a non-believer can use.
Originally posted by chaney3
"God figure". Your term. The same God you have come to reject.
Originally posted by chaney3Do you disagree with god and Jesus and "Satan" and angels being characterized as "supernatural beings", and if so why? And what does me being an ex-Christian have to do with the meaning of the word "supernatural"?
As a former Christian, it's disgusting to view your comments on 'supernatural beings'.
Originally posted by FMFMinus God, I want your view on origin of life.
I don't claim to know. You said to me "You should actually keep your mouth shut and show a little humility", and yet when it comes to conjecture about the "origin of life", I do - for all intents and purposes - 'keep my mouth shut'. So, go on then, what "hypocrisy" is it you think I am guilty of?
Originally posted by chaney3The term is an Apostate, FMF is an Apostate.
No need to copy paste.
You once believed in God, and Jesus. You turned your back on those beliefs.
Now, when speaking to believers, you refer to those past beliefs as 'God figures'.
You should actually keep your mouth shut and show a little humility. But you don't.