20 Jun 15
Originally posted by humyYou didn't deny being a woman. By your own stupid logic that means you are a woman.
I am a man. According to your own stupid 'logic', your vindictiveness means you are a woman. Why are you so vindictive against woman? Statistically most violent crimes are commit by men, not woman.
I stated before that men and women are both flawed in different ways. Despite that you try to convince others I don't like women. That is not the case. I do think women are more vindictive than men though. Women dwell on it and can stay vindictive for years. Men usually get over it much faster.
You started the disrespect that led to all of this and you still dwell on it for mere retaliation. Maybe it is because when I called you stupid you actually were being stupid, unlike when you called me stupid. Now you are constantly on the attack every chance you get. Don't you get tired of hating? What are you gaining from it?
20 Jun 15
Originally posted by Metal BrainWould it? How would I go about find out which climate scientists you have talked to and what they told you? You haven't even given me much detail as to what they said. Did they each tell you the exact same figures, or were there different figures and you reported the average? Did they do an actual survey and publish their findings, or did they just make a guess and tell their best bud Metal Brain?
Then it should be easy for you to prove me wrong.
I really don't know how I can prove you wrong unless you at least give me their names and email addresses.
Originally posted by twhiteheadIf it wasn't for the fact he recently hallucinated/imagined (impossible to tell which ) a whole complex fictitious conversation between me and him that never took place (involving me listing various methods of photon detection, which I couldn't do even with a pistol to my head! That's just not quite within any of my specialist fields of knowledge ) and then accusing me of discontinuing this imaginary conversation that never took place, it would be perfectly reasonable to assume he is simply lying.
Would it? How would I go about find out which climate scientists you have talked to and what they told you? You haven't even given me much detail as to what they said. Did they each tell you the exact same figures, or were there different figures and you reported the average? Did they do an actual survey and publish their findings, or did they just make a ...[text shortened]... on't know how I can prove you wrong unless you at least give me their names and email addresses.
However, given that weird incident, I wonder; could he be now so out of it that he genuinely believes the absurdity that various climate scientists have been choosing to engage in personal converse with him to purposely let specifically him, an arrogant moron nobody with no science credentials, know of all the science facts and latest scientific findings?
20 Jun 15
Originally posted by humyMore lying? Why doesn't that surprise me?
If it wasn't for the fact he recently hallucinated/imagined (impossible to tell which ) a whole complex fictitious conversation between me and him that never took place (involving me listing various methods of photon detection, which I couldn't do even with a pistol to my head! That's just not quite within any of my specialist fields of knowledge ) and then acc ...[text shortened]... obody with no science credentials, know of all the science facts and latest scientific findings?
20 Jun 15
Originally posted by twhitehead
Would it? How would I go about find out which climate scientists you have talked to and what they told you? You haven't even given me much detail as to what they said. Did they each tell you the exact same figures, or were there different figures and you reported the average? Did they do an actual survey and publish their findings, or did they just make a ...[text shortened]... on't know how I can prove you wrong unless you at least give me their names and email addresses.
The post that was quoted here has been removedI have a "male brain".
see:
http://www.cam.ac.uk/research/news/males-and-females-differ-in-specific-brain-structures
"New study examines thousands of brains from two decades of research to reveal differences between male and female brain structure. ..."
Those differences in structure have been proven to be reflected by differences in function. For example, measurements of the electrical activity of male brains when processing language show most males process language mainly on the left side of the brain while most woman tend to more equally process language much more evenly on both sides of the brain.
also see:
http://www.mybrainsolutions.com/library/2014/06/males-v-females-brain-differences/
However; Note:
1, we are only talking about averages and generalizations here. There WILL be plenty of exceptions.
2, there are far more similarities between male and female brains and intellect than differences, although that is not to imply that those differences are trivial.
3, obviously, to merely state that female brains/intellect are different from male brains/intellect doesn't in any way imply a justification for the typical stupid infantile prejudice some people have against females. There are differences but, so what?
If anything, studies have shown that the average male is more likely to commit a violent crime than the average female; evidence, if anything, against the reputation of how 'good' (a totally unscientific word here ) male intellect is compared to that of females.