12,000 year old civilization?:

12,000 year old civilization?:

Science

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.

h

Joined
06 Mar 12
Moves
642
20 Feb 13
1 edit

Originally posted by RJHinds
Fossil records are the collective works of man. A lot of fraud going on there. Ever since the fall of the first man, Satan has been busy influencing man to deny God's truth and believe the lies. The fossil records actually show the result of the worldwide flood of Noah's time.

We should refute evil-lution because it is a lie that causes many men to ref ...[text shortened]... is not true and God is not the Creator and even to deny His existence, which makes them fools.
Fossil records are the collective works of man. A lot of fraud going on there.

you deny the physical existence of the fossils and the fossil record in the ground? Amazing and, assuming you are not just pretending to believe that, highly delusional -like denying the existence of volcanoes.

Evil-lution gives mankind a reason to believe that the Holy Bible is not true and God is not the Creator and even to deny His existence, which makes them fools.

so we are all fools for believing the evidence😛

Cornovii

North of the Tamar

Joined
02 Feb 07
Moves
53689
20 Feb 13

Originally posted by RJHinds
Fossil records are the collective works of man. A lot of fraud going on there. Ever since the fall of the first man, Satan has been busy influencing man to deny God's truth and believe the lies. The fossil records actually show the result of the worldwide flood of Noah's time.

We should refute evil-lution because it is a lie that causes many men to ref ...[text shortened]... is not true and God is not the Creator and even to deny His existence, which makes them fools.
That post goes into 'RHP Comedy Gold'® folklore. When evidence is needed for how paranoid and dumb creationist Christians are, that gem from Ron will be trotted out.

T
Fast above

Slow Below

Joined
29 Sep 03
Moves
25914
20 Feb 13
1 edit

Originally posted by RJHinds
Fossil records are the collective works of man. A lot of fraud going on there. Ever since the fall of the first man, Satan has been busy influencing man to deny God's truth and believe the lies. The fossil records actually show the result of the worldwide flood of Noah's time.

We should refute evil-lution because it is a lie that causes many men to ref ...[text shortened]... is not true and God is not the Creator and even to deny His existence, which makes them fools.
OK. Let's say you're right about the fossil records. That's strike 2.

What about DNA? I've personally compared patterns of divergence
and recorded how functionality has adapted and changed between
and inter-species.

Is that planted by Satan too? Are we then the products of Satan and
not of a God?

It is shortly becoming clear to me that your 'religion' relies more heavily
on the works and proof of Satan than it does of God.
Is there something you need to tell us Hinds?

K
Demon Duck

of Doom!

Joined
20 Aug 06
Moves
20099
20 Feb 13

Originally posted by RJHinds
The fool has said in his heart, "There is no God."
That doesn't apply to me though. I just ignore all deities, I do not bother them and they do not bother me. I find that is the way to peaceful coexistence.

h

Joined
06 Mar 12
Moves
642
20 Feb 13
2 edits

Originally posted by Kepler
That doesn't apply to me though. I just ignore all deities, I do not bother them and they do not bother me. I find that is the way to peaceful coexistence.
and they do not bother me

it is good that you find that “they do not bother” you. If you found that 'they' did 'bother' you, you would need to go and see a doctor.

The Near Genius

Fort Gordon

Joined
24 Jan 11
Moves
13644
21 Feb 13

Originally posted by humy
Fossil records are the collective works of man. A lot of fraud going on there.

you deny the physical existence of the fossils and the fossil record in the ground? Amazing and, assuming you are not just pretending to believe that, highly delusional -like denying the existence of volcanoes.

Evil-lution gives mankind a reason t ...[text shortened]... existence, which makes them fools.

so we are all fools for believing the evidence😛
I am not denying that there are fossils that resulted from all the animals and plants being destroyed in the worldwide flood. I am denying the truth of the order that these fossils as being recorded to support the evil-lution hypothesis. Everyone knows that there was several frauds in an attempt to fill in the missing links in their fossil record to explain the evil idea of ape to man.

Yes, you are fools to believe false evidence and then claim there is no God.

The Near Genius

Fort Gordon

Joined
24 Jan 11
Moves
13644
21 Feb 13
1 edit

Originally posted by Thequ1ck
OK. Let's say you're right about the fossil records. That's strike 2.

What about DNA? I've personally compared patterns of divergence
and recorded how functionality has adapted and changed between
and inter-species.

Is that planted by Satan too? Are we then the products of Satan and
not of a God?

It is shortly becoming clear to me that your 're ks and proof of Satan than it does of God.
Is there something you need to tell us Hinds?
DNA contains the program code that God put into His biological creations to allow them to remain alive and multiply upon the earth. That information code is proof of an intelligent source for there has never been any information that has ever been produced that was not a result of some intelligent input by a source that has intelligence.

The errors that occur in the DNA reproduction today is a result of disobedience by the first humans and God's curses as a result. So Satan's temptation to intice mankind to disobey God is ultimately to blame for all the world's distress.

T
Fast above

Slow Below

Joined
29 Sep 03
Moves
25914
21 Feb 13

Originally posted by RJHinds
DNA contains the program code that God put into His biological creations to allow them to remain alive and multiply upon the earth. That information code is proof of an intelligent source for there has never been any information that has ever been produced that was not a result of some intelligent input by a source that has intelligence.
OK then so it's God that wants us to believe in evolution, not Satan. Am I reading you right?

The Near Genius

Fort Gordon

Joined
24 Jan 11
Moves
13644
21 Feb 13

Originally posted by Thequ1ck
OK then so it's God that wants us to believe in evolution, not Satan. Am I reading you right?
No. It is the exact opposite.

T
Fast above

Slow Below

Joined
29 Sep 03
Moves
25914
21 Feb 13

Originally posted by RJHinds
No. It is the exact opposite.
But you're saying God wrote the code right?

Well we read the code and it clearly highlights patterns of divergence between
species. What are we meant to make of this? Is it some kind of prank?
Is God a prankster?

The Near Genius

Fort Gordon

Joined
24 Jan 11
Moves
13644
21 Feb 13

Originally posted by Thequ1ck
But you're saying God wrote the code right?

Well we read the code and it clearly highlights patterns of divergence between
species. What are we meant to make of this? Is it some kind of prank?
Is God a prankster?
Are you referring to species of the same kind? If so, then that is not evil-lution.

T
Fast above

Slow Below

Joined
29 Sep 03
Moves
25914
21 Feb 13

Originally posted by RJHinds
Are you referring to species of the same kind? If so, then that is not evil-lution.
No, between species. Between man and ape for examples sake.

The Near Genius

Fort Gordon

Joined
24 Jan 11
Moves
13644
21 Feb 13

Originally posted by Thequ1ck
No, between species. Between man and ape for examples sake.
Well, in that case you are reading and interpreting the code wrong. Go back to the drawing board and start over.

T
Fast above

Slow Below

Joined
29 Sep 03
Moves
25914
21 Feb 13

Originally posted by RJHinds
Well, in that case you are reading and interpreting the code wrong. Go back to the drawing board and start over.
Are you suggesting that there are no patterns of divergence between species?

Please enlighten me as to how I should be reading the DNA? How our top scientists
and brightest minds have stumbled.

The Near Genius

Fort Gordon

Joined
24 Jan 11
Moves
13644
21 Feb 13

Originally posted by Thequ1ck
Are you suggesting that there are no patterns of divergence between species?

Please enlighten me as to how I should be reading the DNA? How our top scientists
and brightest minds have stumbled.
What you might think are patterns of divergence between man and ape may be only the designer of both biological systems drawing on what He had already designed to produce a different design (kind). I do not know what you are specifically referring to since we are speaking in generalities, which is really all we can do on this forum anyway.