3 edits
Originally posted by BLReidYou can't be honest with anybody don't you?
..... I started out as a Topalov supporter, and like many others have been completely disgusted by the antics of Toppy and his team. It would be sad indeed if he won by virtue of the forfeited game (clearly the case if they go to a shootout). Kramnik is putting on his game face and making every attempt to appear relaxed and confident, but was obviously uncomf least 3 decisive games, there are three now, not counting the forfeiture). Just some thoughts.
You never started as Topalov supporter in the first place. And now you are trying to play the smart guy who can spin any story he likes.
Or if you ever started as Topalov supporter now you grew to become a turncoat. Either way you are either a liar or a turncoat.
Originally posted by 7ate9He can do so and what he is going to say?
Well, he's fully entitled to apply for a protest within the rules. I also read it could be the case, because of rules being broken to support FIDE-god's favourite little girl who cried, 'wolf'.
I sent you a game, do you want to play??
You broke the rules you didn't let me use my WC?
There will be a lot of fun reading Kramnik's protest ..... I suspect.
LOL
Originally posted by 7ate97ate9, let's not get too overly excited here. The championship isn't over yet. The whole thing is not the type of publicity that one would expect from a world championship. You never know, maybe the whole thing was a cleverly staged thing to attract the world's attention! I'm sure many more people are now following the championship than before the toilet new broke? It is a very strange avenue to gain publicity, I know. But then, you know, people!
Well they changed what was written in the contract or something along those lines... having your own WC. He was entitled to protest because those changes pointed to him being a cheat... which could have far worse future consequences. I'm not a cheat, so give me my toilet! As it turned out it may have been better to be accused a cheat, but these advisers are not the brightest people in the world. lol.
Protest IF he loses...
Whatever the outcome is going to be, I hope they get over it as quickly as possible, coz I'm not sure how much longer I can keep my fingers crossed... hehehehe.
Originally posted by ckoh1965Even the Russians say Kramnik should have played and flie a protest in the meantime.
7ate9, let's not get too overly excited here. The championship isn't over yet. The whole thing is not the type of publicity that one would expect from a world championship. You never know, maybe the whole thing was a cleverly staged thing to attract the world's attention! I'm sure many more people are now following the championship than before the toilet ne ...[text shortened]... ly as possible, coz I'm not sure how much longer I can keep my fingers crossed... hehehehe.
Originally posted by BedlamWe keep up with them. But you seem to present them with a twist.
Topalov admited he was wrong. Dont you keep up to date with events?
Topalov admitted wrongdoing about the handshake. He fell into believing Kramnik is cheating. That's all. And he DID shook hands with Kramnik.
A True man accepts his fault. But what if Kramnik used outside help, say a few times only. There are plenty of reasons to believe he did.
We'll see also how the Fritz 9 will work out at the end.
Topalov will kick his ars IMO and the crybaby will find comfort in suing FIDE.
Originally posted by Los AngelesJust thinking from a lay-person's point of view, and although I don't claim to be a great mathematician, 87% sounds like very much more than 'a few times only' to me, I don't know.
[b]
But what if Kramnik used outside help, say a few times only. There are plenty of reasons to believe he did.
Originally posted by ckoh1965You obviously don't understand that Kramnik is a chess grandmaster. Suppose you have a computer that would choose hands down the BEST move in any position. Would you be surprised that one of the BEST chess players in the entire world would choose the same moves as that computer 80-90% of the time. I wouldn't.
Just thinking from a lay-person's point of view, and although I don't claim to be a great mathematician, 87% sounds like very much more than 'a few times only' to me, I don't know.
1 edit
Originally posted by Los AngelesTopalov whines that he lost the first two games because he isn't man enough to admit that he just blew them. He accuses Kramnik of getting assistance. Kramnik is justifiably offended. FIDE steps in and backs their boy Topalov, giving Kramnik a completely raw deal (need we remind you that the issue of bathrooms was discussed during the contract negotiations?). And now you are either blind enough or stupid enough to say that Kramnik is the crybaby?! I don't normally stoop to personal insults, but you are clearly an idiot.
Topalov will kick his ars IMO and the crybaby will find comfort in suing FIDE.
EDIT- And I WAS a Topalov supporter prior to all of this nonsense.
1 edit
Originally posted by BLReidMay I tell you that I don't like engaging in useless discussions especially with proven turncoats or liars?
Topalov whines that he lost the first two games because he isn't man enough to admit that he just blew them. He accuses Kramnik of getting assistance. Kramnik is justifiably offended. FIDE steps in and backs their boy Topalov, giving Kramnik a completely raw deal (need we remind you that the issue of bathrooms was discussed during the contract negotiations? ou are clearly an idiot.
EDIT- And I WAS a Topalov supporter prior to all of this nonsense.
Most likely S. Danailov overreacted, as Topalov said he didn't believe Kramnik was cheating. There is nothing one can blame Topalov for.
Topalov tolerates S. Danailov mistakes becase he owes S. Danailov a lot. Without S. Danailov he wouldn't be WCC.
Everyone makes mistakes. Your behaivior for example on this forum is full of such.
Originally posted by Los AngelesCompletely avoiding the basic facts and proving my point as clearly as possible.
May I tell you that I don't like engaging in useless discussions especially with proven turncoats or liars?
Most likely S. Danailov overreacted, as Topalov said he didn't believe Kramnik was cheating. There is nothing one can blame Topalov for.
Topalov tolerates S. Danailov mistakes becase he owes S. Danailov a lot. Without S. Danailov he wouldn't be WCC.
Everyone makes mistakes. Your behaivior for example on this forum is full of such.