Your Assessment of Red Hot Pawn

Originally posted by josephw
Unless I'm wrong that wasn't Bob's point in making the reference to "market share", but was intend to mean the increase in interest in RHP by increasing on topic, meaningful and civil discourse within the forums.

He said "And doesn't it seem that we all win when Red Hot Pawn succeeds in winning more market share". It seems pretty clear that he was talking about "market share".

Originally posted by josephw
Trolls just aren't interested in any of that because it doesn't feed their ego's. Trolls need to belittle and criticize others to validate their existence. GrampyBobby isn't interested in wallowing in the mire like I will. He's interested in meaningful and civil dialog, something trolls hate, therefore their hateful diatribes against him.

You seem to be the only person avoiding the topic and directing "diatribes" at fellow posters at the moment. If you are " interested in meaningful and civil dialogue", it's not clear from your posting on this thread so far.

Originally posted by josephw
Unless I'm wrong that wasn't Bob's point in making the reference to "market share", but was intend to mean the increase in interest in RHP by increasing on topic, meaningful and civil discourse within the forums.

Do you think your posting, for example ~ as evidenced on a few threads here these last couple of hours ~ is likely to cause an increase in interest in RHP? Are you demonstrating what it is you claim Grampy Bobby meant when he was making the reference to "market share"?

Originally posted by josephw
Unless I'm wrong that wasn't Bob's point in making the reference to "market share", but was intend to mean the increase in interest in RHP by increasing on topic, meaningful and civil discourse within the forums.

Trolls just aren't interested in any of that because it doesn't feed their ego's. Trolls need to belittle and criticize others to validate their ...[text shortened]... aningful and civil dialog, something trolls hate, therefore their hateful diatribes against him.

Thanks for your astute insights, my friend.

Originally posted by FMF
He said [b]"And doesn't it seem that we all win when Red Hot Pawn succeeds in winning more market share". It seems pretty clear that he was talking about "market share".[/b]

Redundancy much?

-Removed-

It wasn't the Memo thread it was this Thread 167360 pages 13-15

Originally posted by Grampy Bobby
Redundancy much?

You missed this: Why is it you think it is necessary for market share to increase for the forums and chess to continue? What would happen ~ to your way of thinking ~ if the market share that RHP has remained as it is?

-Removed-

Yes, and why it has to be increased if this web site is to be able to continue its presence on the worldwide internet?