1. SubscriberEarl of Trumps
    Pawn Whisperer
    My Kingdom fora Pawn
    Joined
    09 Jan '19
    Moves
    18601
    01 Jul '21 03:45
    @no1marauder said
    Trump never wanted a deal with Iran at all.

    We'll have to see what Biden does; so far, he has not killed any high ranking Iranian officials like Trump did.
    😆 😆
  2. Joined
    07 Dec '05
    Moves
    22048
    01 Jul '21 10:58
    @no1marauder said
    MB: We live in a plutocracy. If you think which political party is in power makes a difference you are sadly mistaken.

    This seems a particularly inappropriate argument to make concerning Iran when Obama entered into the JCPOA with Iran that Trump cancelled.
    I disagree. The parasitic elites delayed Iran from getting nukes. That is essential for an eventual invasion. It fits right into their plans to invade at a later date.

    Why doesn't Biden rejoin the deal? He is obviously continuing Trump's policy that serves the establishment. Ted Cruz supported that policy too and his wife is a member of the CFR.

    Don't be naive. They are all just figureheads serving the parasitic elites.
  3. Joined
    05 Nov '06
    Moves
    142439
    01 Jul '21 15:04
    @metal-brain said
    Not defense. You are simply wrong.
    You have accepted propaganda that has been debunked many times before.
    you are a fool spreading lies.
  4. Joined
    07 Dec '05
    Moves
    22048
    01 Jul '21 16:12
    @mott-the-hoople said
    you are a fool spreading lies.
    Hogwash!
    What did I lie about?
  5. Joined
    05 Nov '06
    Moves
    142439
    01 Jul '21 16:22
    @metal-brain said
    Hogwash!
    What did I lie about?
    YOU KNOW EXACTLY WHAT YOU ARE LYING ABOUT.

    "Not defense. You are simply wrong.
    You have accepted propaganda that has been debunked many times before."

    who was the aggressor? who started this war?
  6. Joined
    07 Dec '05
    Moves
    22048
    01 Jul '21 16:26
    @mott-the-hoople said
    YOU KNOW EXACTLY WHAT YOU ARE LYING ABOUT.

    "Not defense. You are simply wrong.
    You have accepted propaganda that has been debunked many times before."

    who was the aggressor? who started this war?
    Nope. I don't know what you are talking about and I doubt anybody else knows either.

    Which war? WTF are you talking about?
  7. Joined
    05 Nov '06
    Moves
    142439
    01 Jul '21 16:291 edit
    @metal-brain said
    Nope. I don't know what you are talking about and I doubt anybody else knows either.

    Which war? WTF are you talking about?
    you're looking kind of stupid now...go back and read the thread. YOU brought up the war the US used atomic weapons in.

    Its not the war I'M talking about, its the war YOU were talking about.
  8. Joined
    07 Dec '05
    Moves
    22048
    01 Jul '21 20:25
    @mott-the-hoople said
    you're looking kind of stupid now...go back and read the thread. YOU brought up the war the US used atomic weapons in.

    Its not the war I'M talking about, its the war YOU were talking about.
    We are not in WW2 anymore.
    That was the only time a nation used nuclear weapons on another nation.
    They were also cities. Civilian targets which are a war crime.

    What did I lie about? If you cannot answer the question you are looking stupid.
  9. SubscriberEarl of Trumps
    Pawn Whisperer
    My Kingdom fora Pawn
    Joined
    09 Jan '19
    Moves
    18601
    01 Jul '21 21:121 edit
    @Metal-Brain said -
    They were also cities. Civilian targets which are a war crime.

    --------

    Quite contentious, MB. sites were carefully chosen by a committee that targeted war implement manufacturing.

    No question it killed innocent civilians. Now, are those victims the proverbial "Collateral damage"?
    Hard to say but yes, it is illegal by international law NOW , but not then
  10. Joined
    07 Dec '05
    Moves
    22048
    01 Jul '21 21:20
    @earl-of-trumps said
    @Metal-Brain said -
    They were also cities. Civilian targets which are a war crime.

    --------

    Quite contentious, MB. sites were carefully chosen by a committee that targeted war implement manufacturing.

    No question it killed innocent civilians. Now, are those victims the proverbial "Collateral damage"?
    Hard to say but yes, it is illegal by international law NOW , but not then
    The USA is the only country that used nukes on another country.
    How does that give us the moral high ground to deny others nukes?

    People rarely use nukes. The USA is the only exception.
    Is it that the US doesn't want to risk other nations doing what the US government did? All that shows is that the US should give up nukes first.
  11. Standard memberno1marauder
    Naturally Right
    Somewhere Else
    Joined
    22 Jun '04
    Moves
    42677
    01 Jul '21 21:23
    @metal-brain said
    I disagree. The parasitic elites delayed Iran from getting nukes. That is essential for an eventual invasion. It fits right into their plans to invade at a later date.

    Why doesn't Biden rejoin the deal? He is obviously continuing Trump's policy that serves the establishment. Ted Cruz supported that policy too and his wife is a member of the CFR.

    Don't be naive. They are all just figureheads serving the parasitic elites.
    Despite your rant, I rate the chance of a Biden-Iran deal as fairly high and an invasion of Iran during his Presidency as near zero.
  12. Joined
    05 Nov '06
    Moves
    142439
    02 Jul '21 00:28
    @metal-brain said
    The USA is the only country that used nukes on another country.
    How does that give us the moral high ground to deny others nukes?

    People rarely use nukes. The USA is the only exception.
    Is it that the US doesn't want to risk other nations doing what the US government did? All that shows is that the US should give up nukes first.
    and the US used the "atomic" weapons DEFENSIVLY.

    Now act stupid again and say what war.
  13. SubscriberEarl of Trumps
    Pawn Whisperer
    My Kingdom fora Pawn
    Joined
    09 Jan '19
    Moves
    18601
    02 Jul '21 03:32
    @metal-brain said
    The USA is the only country that used nukes on another country.
    How does that give us the moral high ground to deny others nukes?

    People rarely use nukes. The USA is the only exception.
    Is it that the US doesn't want to risk other nations doing what the US government did? All that shows is that the US should give up nukes first.
    Now this is music to my ears. Yes, a truly existential threat to the ME countries, Israel is allowed to have nukes
    but any one of Israel's foes is NOT. And who determines who is worthy..? the US of A, Israel's buddy. Uh huh.

    Our owning nukes has had its affect on the Soviet Union (now Russia) arming themselves with Nukes.
    And just yesterday, I read that China is going to build 100 more nuclear missile silos. So your 2nd point is considerable.

    And so it goes.
  14. Account suspended
    Joined
    08 Jun '07
    Moves
    2120
    02 Jul '21 03:471 edit

    This post is unavailable.

    Please refer to our posting guidelines.

  15. Joined
    05 Nov '06
    Moves
    142439
    02 Jul '21 11:41
    The post that was quoted here has been removed
    its absurd that you suggest a nation doesnt have a right to defend its self when attacked.
Back to Top

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.I Agree