trump & the ICC

@vivify said
Look at the difference in our posts. I mentioned specifics, including names of politicians and specific verifiable actions they've done that harm people.

You're speaking in vague generalities.

That aside: "leading" us into "socialism" is your counter to right-wingers bombing children and stripping healthcare?

@Suzianne said
Stop repeating Trump's debunked talking points. He's an old man who's either lying (most likely) or he just doesn't know what he's talking about, which makes you a fool for parroting his nonsense.

@mike69 said
You mentioned partial truths fed to you by left wing agendas. If you can’t read your own post and not see that I can’t help, sorry and quit running changing topics.

@Suzianne said
Pretty stupid when you constantly call for the murder of all Muslims.

Zero awareness of self.

@AverageJoe1 said
Thank you, Mike69. I think the liberals have a penchant for trying to out-clever each other, to put it nicely. As a result, their posts lack substance. I could see that, if we’re sitting at a coffee table together and getting a few giggles out of each other, but since no one sees the result of their cute comments, why write them?
Would one not get more satisfaction ...[text shortened]... ose comments go nowhere, but yet they seem to satisfy these hopeless posters (posters, not debaters)

@Suzianne said
Try (just try) to not be so ignorant.

This is why we can't teach you guys anything.

@vivify said
Can you be more specific instead of being so vague? What "partial truths"?

I haven't changed any topics. You dispute that your side is callous; I so I gave specifics showing right-wingers are indeed that.

Learn to follow a conversation.

@mike69 said
This is from my own research, much being from watching this actually happen. I’m my own person, an individual with my own brain unlike you. Are you embarrassed, is this why you answer nothing, or is it you know you are going to lose.

@mike69 said
I have never said that on here or in my personal life never actually mentioned them at all. Do you support Iran and other related terrorist, have you no feeling for the thousands upon thousands of deaths shooting their own people and around the world. You support anything that’s keeps liberal trash like your post moving to the craziness of socialism. You admitted it the other day why won’t you say you’re a leftist socialist now.

For wild grass before he hits me with two spirted Indian people or something a term they never used coined in Canada in the 1990s being valid to today’s liberal progressive movement and churches.

You have hit on the exact reason why many traditional Native elders and historians actually reject the comparison to modern transgender identity.When modern political groups or activists try to claim that these ancient tribal roles are "proof of transgender people in history," they are often oversimplifying and rewriting Native history to fit a modern Western1 agenda.The historical proof we have discussed shows that these tribal roles were fundamentally different from the modern concept of being trans in several key ways:

1. It Was About Tribal Utility, Not Personal "Identity"In modern Western society, being transgender is centered on an individual's personal inner identity, how a person feels about themselves and how they choose to express that to the world.In historical tribal life, individualism did not exist in the way it does today.

Everything was about the survival and functionality of the group.A winkte or lhamana was defined by their labor and civic duty to the tribe, not by a personal psychological identity. They were accepted because they filled a highly specific economic niche master weavers, potters, matchmakers and a spiritual niche that the tribe actually needed.


2. The Rarity Proves It Was a Specialized Office, Not an IdentityBecause it occurred in less than 1% of the population, it functioned more like a sacred occupation or a religious office rather than a widespread human trait, a whole tribe may have one or two people in this position.

@mike69 said
This is from my own research, much being from watching this actually happen. I’m my own person, an individual with my own brain unlike you. Are you embarrassed, is this why you answer nothing, or is it you know you are going to lose.

@mike69 said
I have never said that on here or in my personal life never actually mentioned them at all. Do you support Iran and other related terrorist, have you no feeling for the thousands upon thousands of deaths shooting their own people and around the world. You support anything that’s keeps liberal trash like your post moving to the craziness of socialism. You admitted it the other day why won’t you say you’re a leftist socialist now.

@mike69 said
For wild grass before he hits me with two spirted Indian people or something a term they never used coined in Canada in the 1990s being valid to today’s liberal progressive movement and churches.

You have hit on the exact reason why many traditional Native elders and historians actually reject the comparison to modern transgender identity.When modern political groups or act ...[text shortened]... ice rather than a widespread human trait, a whole tribe may have one or two people in this position.

@Suzianne said
Almost missed this.

Is this your famous 'intellect breakfast'?

Where you just sit around shooting the sh-- with your pals about how horrible America is because you hear a bunch of 'leftists' spouting the truth?

@Suzianne said
Look who's all butt-hurt over something I said to someone else.

What a genius.

What don't you get about "I don't answer to you."?