04 Feb 23
@averagejoe1 saidYeah cos I could give a 💩 about your opinion of me or anyone else below average Joe. Just trying to keep you honest, heaven knows it ain’t easy.
My goodness. I do believe you took my response to your ‘shut up half wit” post personally!!😂 I referenced ‘they’, not you. Ha ha. You liberals are truly so sensitive. It is beyond my imagination. Do you get offfeennnnnndded easily as well?
Downer. I can help you if you think you need to toughen up.
04 Feb 23
@averagejoe1 saidSee Joe this is why you are so treacle thick, you never read anything beyond a beer bottle label. Doesn’t stop you judging all those things you know absolutely nothing about though does it.
But why do he libs take any time to read up on Islam? Does it mean you have a nefarious goal, or mission, ,,,,,what is the deal? So weird/. I think I will go play golf
04 Feb 23
@jj-adams saidAgain all religions are bad when the idiots who adhere to them get to make laws, if they keep their nonsense in their churches, mosques and temples then they are more or less harmless
Waiting for someone to bring up the Crusades from 1000 years ago or the Salem Witch Trials in an effort to claim Christianity is just as bad or worse than Jizzlam.
- Joined
- 05 Nov 06
- Moves
- 142557
04 Feb 23
@kevcvs57 saidvery stupid statement
Again all religions are bad when the idiots who adhere to them get to make laws, if they keep their nonsense in their churches, mosques and temples then they are more or less harmless
04 Feb 23
2 edits
@mott-the-hoople saidI think then that you are saying that people should leave their personal religious thoughts at the door when they enter negotiations about policy.
very stupid statement
What about their other personal thoughts? Such as, I hate the Japanese who bombed Pearl Harbor, because. I lost my grandad in that bombing.
So how can you distinguish religion But not any other personal influences? Yes, Mott was right, your comment really holds no water.
04 Feb 23
@mott-the-hoople saidOnly when viewed by a very stupid person, government and a belief in supernatural judgemental creatures is a toxic mix.
very stupid statement
04 Feb 23
@averagejoe1 saidThat’s a very idiosyncratic example but that person probably shouldn’t be on the Japanese liaison committee other than that his opinion about Japanese people probably won’t be relevant.
I think then that you are saying that people should leave their personal religious thoughts at the door when they enter negotiations about policy.
What about their other personal thoughts? Such as, I hate the Japanese who bombed Pearl Harbor, because. I lost my grandad in that bombing.
So how can you distinguish religion But not any other personal influences? Yes, Mott was right, your comment really holds no water.
The problem with religion is that the scope of opinion covers the entirety of what the religious observer considers to be the worth of another person. Secondly how can a religious person NOT try to bend their fellow citizens to the will of what they believe to be the ultimate truth and authority in the universe. But the biggest danger religion poses to civil society is its certitude.
04 Feb 23
@kevcvs57 saidkev doesn't like certitude except his own.
That’s a very idiosyncratic example but that person probably shouldn’t be on the Japanese liaison committee other than that his opinion about Japanese people probably won’t be relevant.
The problem with religion is that the scope of opinion covers the entirety of what the religious observer considers to be the worth of another person. Secondly how can a religious person NO ...[text shortened]... authority in the universe. But the biggest danger religion poses to civil society is its certitude.
04 Feb 23
@kevcvs57 saidThat encompasses a lot….but get this.
That’s a very idiosyncratic example but that person probably shouldn’t be on the Japanese liaison committee other than that his opinion about Japanese people probably won’t be relevant.
The problem with religion is that the scope of opinion covers the entirety of what the religious observer considers to be the worth of another person. Secondly how can a religious person NO ...[text shortened]... authority in the universe. But the biggest danger religion poses to civil society is its certitude.
I don’t know which of y’all is the most liberal, but let’s say it’s Shav , since he thinks the government should provide housing for everybody. So I am here to tell you that if he and I were on the same committee, he would try to swing me purely based upon his liberal dogma imbedded in him over the years. Like, if I would be fighting to stop this foolish idea of letting students not pay their debts, while Shav’s sits there, thinking quite logically in his mind that the government should maybe erase all debt? Why not? He would come to the table with pre-formed opinions coming right out of the gate.
. So again and your comment here is just not getting traction..