19 Oct '21 12:32>
@divegeester said"Setting national precedents for reduced working hours is not good management. "
Setting national precedents for reduced working hours is not good management.
The team I lead where highly motivated, well rewarded, developed, promoted, happy and retained. One person asked the question, the answer was no and no one asked again, they were on contracts, the business is not obliged to change a contact especially if it sets a national precedent.
The ...[text shortened]... er person led, missed all their financial numbers, KPIs and the leader eventually left the business.
You keep saying that. What do you think it means. We already have reduced working hours, no company is obligated in offering part time if it doesn't want to just because another company does.
"The team I lead where highly motivated, well rewarded, developed, promoted, happy and retained"
Unless you were a recent mother who had to make adjustments. And, of course, if we believed you.
"The team the other person led, missed all their financial numbers, KPIs and the leader eventually left the business."
Yes, and it was all because of those mothers who got half hours and not the additional mismanagement that came with it or despite it.