Jon Stewart on Fox's reaction to Warren Buffett

Jon Stewart on Fox's reaction to Warren Buffett

Debates

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.

U

Joined
10 May 09
Moves
13341
20 Aug 11

Hilarious! And insightful.

http://www.thedailyshow.com/full-episodes/thu-august-18-2011-anne-hathaway

Joined
03 Feb 07
Moves
194453
20 Aug 11

Originally posted by USArmyParatrooper
Hilarious! And insightful.

http://www.thedailyshow.com/full-episodes/thu-august-18-2011-anne-hathaway
He is in top form lately. I wonder if his ratings would be anywhere near what they are but for Fox News.

Joined
03 Feb 07
Moves
194453
20 Aug 11

Originally posted by USArmyParatrooper
Hilarious! And insightful.

http://www.thedailyshow.com/full-episodes/thu-august-18-2011-anne-hathaway
Damn! I finally got around to watching it. I'm supposed to be outraged that 99 percent of poor people own a refrigerator?! How do Fox News jerkholes sleep at night?!

U

Joined
10 May 09
Moves
13341
20 Aug 11
1 edit

Originally posted by Kunsoo
Damn! I finally got around to watching it. I'm supposed to be outraged that 99 percent of poor people own a refrigerator?! How do Fox News jerkholes sleep at night?!
An interesting point is that the bottom 50% of earners have 2.5% of the wealth.

So while Boner wants to increase tax revenue by "expanding the tax pool" (code for increasing taxes on the poor), doing so would amount to nothing because they just about have nothing.

You would to take HALF of everything the bottom 50% own to equal taxing the top two tax brackets what they were paying in the 90's in order to equal the same tax revenue.

Here's another fact. The top 400 richest people in the country have more wealth the half of the entire country combined.

Insanity at Masada

tinyurl.com/mw7txe34

Joined
23 Aug 04
Moves
26660
20 Aug 11

Originally posted by USArmyParatrooper
An interesting point is that the bottom 50% of earners have 2.5% of the wealth.

So while Boner wants to increase tax revenue by "expanding the tax pool" (code for increasing taxes on the poor), doing so would amount to nothing because they just about have nothing.

You would to take HALF of everything the bottom 50% own to equal taxing the t ...[text shortened]... chest people in the country have more wealth the half of the entire country combined.
I bet you're a pretty good shot if you know what you're supposed to hit.

U

Joined
10 May 09
Moves
13341
20 Aug 11

Originally posted by AThousandYoung
I bet you're a pretty good shot if you know what you're supposed to hit.
I'm a good shot. But why would you assume that?

Insanity at Masada

tinyurl.com/mw7txe34

Joined
23 Aug 04
Moves
26660
20 Aug 11

Originally posted by USArmyParatrooper
I'm a good shot. But why would you assume that?
Your handle

Joined
03 Feb 07
Moves
194453
21 Aug 11

Originally posted by USArmyParatrooper
An interesting point is that the bottom 50% of earners have 2.5% of the wealth.

So while Boner wants to increase tax revenue by "expanding the tax pool" (code for increasing taxes on the poor), doing so would amount to nothing because they just about have nothing.

You would to take HALF of everything the bottom 50% own to equal taxing the t ...[text shortened]... chest people in the country have more wealth the half of the entire country combined.
Yeah, one minute 700 billion is a pittance. The next minute a million dollars cut from NPR is, well, "you have to start somewhere."

But the war on the poor continues, with the rhetoric ratcheted up several decibels higher than even Reagan with his "welfare queens" and "truly needy" crap.

n

The Catbird's Seat

Joined
21 Oct 06
Moves
2598
21 Aug 11

Originally posted by USArmyParatrooper
Hilarious! And insightful.

http://www.thedailyshow.com/full-episodes/thu-august-18-2011-anne-hathaway
Where is the Daily equivalent attacking the nonsense on MSNBC?

This piece entirely ignores the basic truth that Congress and Presidents have consistently spent more than revenue, and that raising taxes will not reduce the deficit or debt. More revenues will create more irresponsible government programs, and more dependency. This is historical fact not fantasy.

Stewart makes no refutation of the Fox people's comments. Instead he isolates and takes things out of context, distorting, and misrepresenting to a friendly audience.

F

Joined
28 Oct 05
Moves
34587
21 Aug 11

Originally posted by normbenign
Stewart makes no refutation of the Fox people's comments. Instead he isolates and takes things out of context, distorting, and misrepresenting to a friendly audience.
Some people think Jon Stewart is funny, others think Ann Coulter is funny. Different strokes I suppose.

n

The Catbird's Seat

Joined
21 Oct 06
Moves
2598
21 Aug 11

Originally posted by FMF
Some people think Jon Stewart is funny, others think Ann Coulter is funny. Different strokes I suppose.
I think he's funny, but don't take seriously anything he says.

F

Joined
28 Oct 05
Moves
34587
21 Aug 11

Originally posted by normbenign
I think he's funny, but don't take seriously anything he says.
And I think the same about Coulter.

Civis Americanus Sum

New York

Joined
26 Dec 07
Moves
17585
21 Aug 11

Originally posted by FMF
And I think the same about Coulter.
The difference is that Coulter is trying to be serious.

Joined
03 Feb 07
Moves
194453
21 Aug 11

Originally posted by normbenign
I think he's funny, but don't take seriously anything he says.
Well, he's a comedian. The problem is that a comedian is providing the best news coverage in the country right now.

F

Joined
28 Oct 05
Moves
34587
21 Aug 11

Originally posted by sh76
The difference is that Coulter is trying to be serious.
Which - in a way - makes her all the funnier.