12 May '22 22:39>
@suzianne saidDebates are how people determine who is lying. Not you.
But it's not debates, is it, just you coming up with a bunch of lies.
That's not debate.
@suzianne saidDebates are how people determine who is lying. Not you.
But it's not debates, is it, just you coming up with a bunch of lies.
That's not debate.
@suzianne saidYou are calling the truth a lie again.
You have the wrong end of the stick yet again.
I said Truth. Actual Truth. Not lies. If you want to tell lies to try to gaslight people into thinking your lies are truth, good luck. Most here see through your ruse.
@suzianne saidProfoundly correct. No debate, But again misses the point.
No one "decides" the truth.
It either is, or it isn't.
@suzianne saidIf we're censoring people for spreading misinformation, then..
No one "decides" the truth.
It either is, or it isn't.
@techsouth saidNaaaa, I think Suzianne is on to something, she certainly has dog whistled and gas lighted a lot more sense.
If we're censoring people for spreading misinformation, then..
For the purposes of determining who will get censored and who will not, someone or some group will have to determine what is "true" and what is "not".
For example, if Venezuela makes it illegal to falsely assert an election was rigged, then President Maduro, or someone he overseas will be the one to decide ...[text shortened]... be true, but in and of itself that shouldn't be enough to decide that allegations cannot be raised.
@suzianne saidAhhh, you again bring up one of my mantras.....Why do you libs continue to worry about what billionaires are doing ? About How much money they have? If they don't give a rat's ass about you, how has what they think, or don't think, about you have anything to do with you!?!?!??!!?!?!?!?!???!!??! Let's say a billionaire sees you walking down the street, and they think, or don't think, something about you........Suzy, what has that (what he thinks or doesn't) got to do with you?
Why do you (who I'm just guessing isn't a millionaire) stand up for and take orders from billionaires? It's not like they give a rat's ass about you.
@suzianne saidYou agree with who? Sonhouse does this a lot, ,must be in the blood, You should hit 'Quote'.
Yeah, I do.
I agree with him.
@averagejoe1 saidThis is a re-post with all due respects. Please all come back on this. We need to break some barriers. Break barriers, like highlighting all of the Tucker lies. I dont want to steal Suzianne's thunder, but let us have at it. Let her have first shot.
Ahhh, you again bring up one of my mantras.....Why do you libs continue to worry about what billionaires are doing ? About How much money they have? If they don't give a rat's ass about you, how has what they think, or don't think, about you have anything to do with you!?!?!??!!?!?!?!?!???!!??! Let's say a billionaire sees you walking down the street, and they think, o ...[text shortened]... s right up there with what Lie did Tucker tell tonight.
Everyone is standing by, especially me.
@averagejoe1 saidYeah, I did. See the post I replied to. Who did that post quote?
You agree with who? Sonhouse does this a lot, ,must be in the blood, You should hit 'Quote'.
@techsouth saidNo one "decides" the truth.
If we're censoring people for spreading misinformation, then..
For the purposes of determining who will get censored and who will not, someone or some group will have to determine what is "true" and what is "not".
For example, if Venezuela makes it illegal to falsely assert an election was rigged, then President Maduro, or someone he overseas will be the one to decide ...[text shortened]... be true, but in and of itself that shouldn't be enough to decide that allegations cannot be raised.
@metal-brain saidNo, lies are lies way before the debate about it.
Debates are how people determine who is lying. Not you.
@jimmac saidIt is already truth or a lie before it gets researched. The research just uncovers the truth or lie. Just because you don't know the truth, that doesn't mean you get to decide the truth. This is something MB never quite understood.
Profoundly correct. No debate, But again misses the point.
I tell you about the extreme levels of domestic violence by Aboriginal men in outback ( Australian) communities towards both Woman and Children, inc sexual abuse, and you say, truth or lie?? Can I say it or not?? You "decide", yea, get it. You need to answer, can I say it.
@suzianne saidI think we're not on the same page because not only can I read, but I can think too.
No one "decides" the truth.
It either is, or it isn't.
Come on, man. You can read, right?
@suzianne saidSo if I post this on facebook, along with 25,000,000 other truths, who do you suggest researches them all and how long before they are verified as truth or lie. In Australia we have an Aboriginal politician, Jacinta Price, that has been advocating for these marginalized Woman and children for a very long time but every time she brings it up she is shut down as lying. Her truth is censored. Now this is one small subject, Who decides what can be, put out there?? Simply an impossible task.
It is already truth or a lie before it gets researched. The research just uncovers the truth or lie. Just because you don't know the truth, that doesn't mean you get to decide the truth. This is something MB never quite understood.
@suzianne saidHow do you know they are lies when you always fail to prove they are lies?
No, lies are lies way before the debate about it.
You still don't get it.