@no1marauder saidTHIS? was your ‘answer? Why do qualify everything that you write about so that it fits your own premise??
I answered it several posts ago on this page.
“Yes a "biological male" i.e. a person that says "male" on their birth certificate should be able to compete in girls and women's sports events IF they have had " had some significant gender affirming treatment that altered their bodily traits" and "unless and until there was compelling scientific evidence that girls and women who receive such treatments retain a marked physical advantage over female athletes."
Okay, now we’re getting somewhere. Your answer is yes, but only if certain conditions are met.
So let’s stick with your position. You are saying that a biological male may compete against biological females if he has undergone what you consider ‘significant gender-affirming treatment,’ unless there is ‘compelling scientific evidence’ that he retains a marked physical advantage. Whew. Bring a scientist to the swim meat.
Like, Who determines what constitutes a ‘significant’ treatment? How much residual physical advantage is acceptable before it becomes unfair?
And Who determines whether the scientific evidence is ‘compelling’? I mean, Marauder.
Andwhy should female athletes have to prove that the male athlete retains a ‘marked physical advantage’ rather than the person seeking entry into the women’s game having to demonstrate that the competitive advantage has been eliminated?!?!? ( my favorite point here, for you to answer this last question)
Bring it.
@AverageJoe1 saidThe sports organization running the competition.
THIS? was your ‘answer? Why do qualify everything that you write about so that it fits your own premise??
“Yes a "biological male" i.e. a person that says "male" on their birth certificate should be able to compete in girls and women's sports events IF they have had " had some significant gender affirming treatment that altered their bodily traits" and "unless and unt ...[text shortened]... s been eliminated?!?!? ( my favorite point here, for you to answer this last question)
Bring it.
2 edits
@Mott-The-Hoople saidYou think 29 is a big number? And that's like ever, not yearly? And International is included? Entire US states have NEVER had a single trans-female athlete even compete, much less win, and they want to make federal laws that check their undercarriage?
men without dicks...is that better? Its impossible to change your sex
the numbers are much higher than what you suggest as shown in link I will post.
how many compete that havent publicly announced
https://www.outsports.com/2024/12/6/22948400/transgender-trans-athlete-championship-national-world-title/
Just the NCAA, which is a small subset of the state, regional, and international athlete total, has 250,000 female athletes.
Your solution is to have the government "check" (whatever that means) to make sure the correct gear is attached before every single athlete competes? THat seems soooo ridiculous for 29 athletes.
Why not just let the sports leagues themselves figure this out? You want government control of intimate details.
By the way, sports leagues do have rules about this, and I'm fine with them defining enforceable strategies for fair competition. Just don't like the government involvement here.
@no1marauder saidWhat if it is a group of neighborhood girls at the city park playing basketball with each other?
The sports organization running the competition.
uhhhh, who decides then? What if the girls ask you want you think, these guys want to play against us? Now, here we go....are you going to say what you think should happen, or write a standard pansy answer....the girls decide!
nononononono. What do YOU YOU think should happen?
(;no way to present genialogical gender empathy studies etc)
@AverageJoe1 saidYou need to answer your own dang questions mate. This is dumb.
What if it is a group of neighborhood girls at the city park playing basketball with each other?
uhhhh, who decides then? What if the girls ask you want you think, these guys want to play against us? Now, here we go....are you going to say what you think should happen, or write a standard pansy answer....the girls decide!
nononononono. What do YOU YOU think should happen?
(;no way to present genialogical gender empathy studies etc)
@AverageJoe1 saidAs Jon Voight said to Robert Deniro in Heat:
What if it is a group of neighborhood girls at the city park playing basketball with each other?
uhhhh, who decides then? What if the girls ask you want you think, these guys want to play against us? Now, here we go....are you going to say what you think should happen, or write a standard pansy answer....the girls decide!
nononononono. What do YOU YOU think should happen?
(;no way to present genialogical gender empathy studies etc)
"It's a free country, brother."
@wildgrass saidBut none of you ever answer questions. I asked them, but you do not answer. Like is any person entitled to the labor of another person. You did not answer that one. So you want me to answer that one. I already know the answer, but did not want to give it away, since I was asking the question..
You need to answer your own dang questions mate. This is dumb.
Pesky, I know. Tell me what is wrong with marauder with his failure to stay on topic and answer a question. On this thread and other threads like ‘here we go.’
@AverageJoe1 saidI answered your question several times.
But none of you ever answer questions. I asked them, but you do not answer. Like is any person entitled to the labor of another person. You did not answer that one. So you want me to answer that one. I already know the answer, but did not want to give it away, since I was asking the question..
Pesky, I know. Tell me what is wrong with marauder with his failure to stay on topic and answer a question. On this thread and other threads like ‘here we go.’
You play this game all the time; if you don't like the answer you stomp your feet and whine.
It's childish.
@no1marauder saidIn this very thread you were asked my question, and continued to dance and qualify your discussions, some of you call it goal posting or somesuch.
I answered your question several times.
You play this game all the time; if you don't like the answer you stomp your feet and whine.
It's childish.
Since you did not answer 'straight out, and instead changed the premise to elements of gender therapy and who-knows-what-else, you did NOT answer the original question. Since it is a yes/no question, bring us all up to speed with your answer. One word. ..you can do this.
@AverageJoe1 saidHe is answering your questions, more patiently than is deserved.
But none of you ever answer questions. I asked them, but you do not answer. Like is any person entitled to the labor of another person. You did not answer that one. So you want me to answer that one. I already know the answer, but did not want to give it away, since I was asking the question..
Pesky, I know. Tell me what is wrong with marauder with his failure to stay on topic and answer a question. On this thread and other threads like ‘here we go.’
@AverageJoe1 saidY'all have championed this as a defining cultural issue of our time, and yet you cannot even agree on basic terminology. And i would wager that you don't even watch women's sports at all.
In this very thread you were asked my question, and continued to dance and qualify your discussions, some of you call it goal posting or somesuch.
Since you did not answer 'straight out, and instead changed the premise to elements of gender therapy and who-knows-what-else, you did NOT answer the original question. Since it is a yes/no question, bring us all up to speed with your answer. One word. ..you can do this.
It's a cultural issue that you have strong opinions on but haven't even thought about.
@AverageJoe1 saidNo, it's not a "yes or no" question.
In this very thread you were asked my question, and continued to dance and qualify your discussions, some of you call it goal posting or somesuch.
Since you did not answer 'straight out, and instead changed the premise to elements of gender therapy and who-knows-what-else, you did NOT answer the original question. Since it is a yes/no question, bring us all up to speed with your answer. One word. ..you can do this.
@Metal-Brain saidthese freaks are invading womens sports because they cannot win in mens division...that is all
It is easier to define a biological female I think. I have never heard of a penis transplant so they must still have vaginas. Right?
I looked up penis transplant and got nothing. I don't think it is possible to give a female a penis. So I often wounder what the point is of a woman transitioning to a man if she cannot get a penis.
@no1marauder saidyou have not answered anything...you post things that are very rare and then play it off as if it is the norm...shytweasel if you will
I answered your question several times.
You play this game all the time; if you don't like the answer you stomp your feet and whine.
It's childish.
@wildgrass saidYou will not find him saying yes or no to ‘ do you think that a biological man should compete with a biological woman?”
He is answering your questions, more patiently than is deserved.
although I do think he mentioned something about empathetic, gender studies or something like that.
You are damn loyal to your ilk. I will give you that..