Did big tech violate the Sherman Act?

Did big tech violate the Sherman Act?

Debates

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.

MB

Joined
07 Dec 05
Moves
22048
12 Jan 21

Apple, Google, and Amazon banned the social media network Parler from their services.

Does that violate the Sherman Act?

m

Joined
07 Feb 09
Moves
151917
12 Jan 21
1 edit

@metal-brain said
Apple, Google, and Amazon banned the social media network Parler from their services.

Does that violate the Sherman Act?
If it was the social media arm of Al Qaeda, would you be asking the same question ?

MB

Joined
07 Dec 05
Moves
22048
12 Jan 21

@mghrn55 said
If it was the social media arm of Al Qaeda, would you be asking the same question ?
Has Parler been officially labeled a terrorist organization?

k
Flexible

The wrong side of 60

Joined
22 Dec 11
Moves
37071
12 Jan 21

@metal-brain said
Apple, Google, and Amazon banned the social media network Parler from their services.

Does that violate the Sherman Act?
If your punting the lie that they acted as a cabal then you’ll need some of that proof stuff like you were told the first time you punted that lie.

Cryptic

Behind the scenes

Joined
27 Jun 16
Moves
3091
13 Jan 21

@metal-brain said
Apple, Google, and Amazon banned the social media network Parler from their services.

Does that violate the Sherman Act?
Why don't you let the courts decide that one.

MB

Joined
07 Dec 05
Moves
22048
13 Jan 21

@kevcvs57 said
If your punting the lie that they acted as a cabal then you’ll need some of that proof stuff like you were told the first time you punted that lie.
There is ne need for a cabal to violate the Sherman Act. You are confused.

MB

Joined
07 Dec 05
Moves
22048
13 Jan 21

@mchill said
Why don't you let the courts decide that one.
An anti-trust lawsuit must be filed first.
Why isn't the DOJ doing that?

Naturally Right

Somewhere Else

Joined
22 Jun 04
Moves
42677
13 Jan 21

@metal-brain said
An anti-trust lawsuit must be filed first.
Why isn't the DOJ doing that?
The DOJ isn't the legal arm of the right wing nut fringe.

Parler filed suit against Amazon, so there is no need for DOJ intervention in any event. https://www.seattletimes.com/business/amazon/amazon-rebuffs-conservative-social-media-app-parlers-demand-to-be-reinstated-online/

MB

Joined
07 Dec 05
Moves
22048
13 Jan 21

@no1marauder said
The DOJ isn't the legal arm of the right wing nut fringe.

Parler filed suit against Amazon, so there is no need for DOJ intervention in any event. https://www.seattletimes.com/business/amazon/amazon-rebuffs-conservative-social-media-app-parlers-demand-to-be-reinstated-online/
I am aware of that. That doesn't answer my question.
Is it a violation of the Sherman Act?

Cryptic

Behind the scenes

Joined
27 Jun 16
Moves
3091
13 Jan 21
1 edit

@metal-brain said
An anti-trust lawsuit must be filed first.
Why isn't the DOJ doing that?
Why isn't the DOJ doing that?

Why don't you ask The DOJ? I doubt anyone here works for them.

k
Flexible

The wrong side of 60

Joined
22 Dec 11
Moves
37071
13 Jan 21

@metal-brain said
I am aware of that. That doesn't answer my question.
Is it a violation of the Sherman Act?
Perhaps you should read the act and then explain how Amazon, Google or Apple are competitors of Parler. It’s like claiming a grocer is a competitor of auto repair garage.
Facebook and Twitter especially might be considered competitors of Parler but they have no say in who Amazon, Google or Apple decide to remove from there servers.

MB

Joined
07 Dec 05
Moves
22048
13 Jan 21

@kevcvs57 said
Perhaps you should read the act and then explain how Amazon, Google or Apple are competitors of Parler. It’s like claiming a grocer is a competitor of auto repair garage.
Facebook and Twitter especially might be considered competitors of Parler but they have no say in who Amazon, Google or Apple decide to remove from there servers.
Why do they have a problem with Parler? Parler didn't do anything to them.

Guppy poo

Sewers of Holland

Joined
31 Jan 04
Moves
87862
13 Jan 21

@metal-brain said
Apple, Google, and Amazon banned the social media network Parler from their services.

Does that violate the Sherman Act?
Loonie!

k
Flexible

The wrong side of 60

Joined
22 Dec 11
Moves
37071
13 Jan 21

@metal-brain said
Why do they have a problem with Parler? Parler didn't do anything to them.
Parker is a site where terrorism and insurgency are openly advocated. Hosting such a site could leave them open to accusations of collusion.
I think your only focused on your own anger and that of your fellow ultra right wing racists and you have no idea how angry the other side are. Any business that facilitates your ability to spout your lies and hatred will be economically sanctioned by the majority and that is the right and duty of the majority.
The time for pretending that all ideas are equal are over for now.

MB

Joined
07 Dec 05
Moves
22048
13 Jan 21

@kevcvs57 said
Parker is a site where terrorism and insurgency are openly advocated. Hosting such a site could leave them open to accusations of collusion.
I think your only focused on your own anger and that of your fellow ultra right wing racists and you have no idea how angry the other side are. Any business that facilitates your ability to spout your lies and hatred will be economica ...[text shortened]... right and duty of the majority.
The time for pretending that all ideas are equal are over for now.
What is your source of information?