13 Jul '20 23:09>
@kazetnagorra saidIt's transparently laughable to put all these things in the same category
You have admitted reading both VDARE and American Renaissance, both frothing-at-the-mouth white supremacist publications.
@kazetnagorra saidIt's transparently laughable to put all these things in the same category
You have admitted reading both VDARE and American Renaissance, both frothing-at-the-mouth white supremacist publications.
@kazetnagorra saidIt'd be impossible to find the numbers on hate hoaxes as they occur on the day to day.... But the number of famous cases that I've seen be proven hoaxes is greater than the number of times I've seen them come out to be real.
Victims of Hate Crime Incidents
There were 7,036 single-bias incidents involving 8,646 victims. A percent distribution of victims by bias type shows that 59.6 percent of victims were targeted because of the offenders’ race/ethnicity/ancestry bias; 18.7 percent were targeted because of the offenders’ religious bias; 16.7 percent were victimized because of the offenders ...[text shortened]... motivation would you have for attempting to minimize the scale of hate crimes in the U.S., I wonder?
@kazetnagorra saidThe WSJ endorses racists?
Given the WSJ's endorsement of conspiracy theories and racists, I would say it is a questionable publication though not a white supremacist one.
@philokalia saidThis type of anecdotal "hold yer breath until you turn blue" is typical of right wing arguments. There isn't even an attempt to quantify their automatic suspicion of any minority who says they are a victim of a hate crime; they just won't believe it, period.
It'd be impossible to find the numbers on hate hoaxes as they occur on the day to day.... But the number of famous cases that I've seen be proven hoaxes is greater than the number of times I've seen them come out to be real.
I would assume that there's just as many fakr accusations of racism and other faked events that we never hear about.
I've even witnessed a hate ...[text shortened]... omplained to him about some unknown racist yelling the n word at him. Honestly, it was pretty funny.
@no1marauder saidYou obviously didn't read the WSJ article, it WAS an attempt to quantify the suspicion of hate crime claims.
This type of anecdotal "hold yer breath until you turn blue" is typical of right wing arguments. There isn't even an attempt to quantify their automatic suspicion of any minority who says they are a victim of a hate crime; they just won't believe it, period.
It is most atypical in almost all other cases of crime for people to automatically be skeptical of victims reporting except perhaps for rape.
@dood111 saidI've read material on the propaganda book that is being discussed; rather than do any type of actual research using official police records, the author selectively pulled out news articles.
You obviously didn't read the WSJ article, it WAS an attempt to quantify the suspicion of hate crime claims.
The author investigated 350 at random and found almost 70% were bogus.
@no1marauder saidSource?
I've read material on the propaganda book that is being discussed; rather than do any type of actual research using official police records, the author selectively pulled out news articles.
@philokalia said"In Hoax, Professor Wilfred Reilly examines over one hundred widely publicized incidents of so-called hate crimes that never actually happened."
Source?
@philokalia saidPerhaps that’s a number you should be researching instead of basing your argument on such idle speculation?
I don't know... Like, five hate hoaxes for every hate crime...?
@philokalia saidNo1 just squashed you.
Another fun hate hoax, also just came across it in the last couple of days
https://twitter.com/MrAndyNgo/status/1282679248998797312?s=19
Nearly three weeks after an alleged racist attack on a biracial woman in Downtown Madison, police and the woman’s family are saying little to nothing about whether the authorities are any closer to identifying the perpetrators.
...
Unlike in other unsolved cases, police have not released any images from surveillance cameras that might have recorded the attack or the assailants.
@no1marauder saidWhere's the criticism?
"In Hoax, Professor Wilfred Reilly examines over one hundred widely publicized incidents of so-called hate crimes that never actually happened."
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B07F6RN7Y4/ref=dp-kindle-redirect?_encoding=UTF8&btkr=1
"Doing research for a book, Hate Crime Hoax, I was able to easily put together a data set of 409 confirmed hate hoaxes. An overlapping but su ...[text shortened]... illion hate crimes by victimization studies and Mr. Reading the Papers found 400 he says were false.