Most overrated movie ever

Most overrated movie ever

Culture

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.

s
Fast and Curious

slatington, pa, usa

Joined
28 Dec 04
Moves
53223
16 Oct 08

Originally posted by Arachnarchist
NO WAY!!! The dark knight rocked.

I gotta go with Star Wars I-III
Yep, it rocked and rocked, and rocked and about 1/4 the way through just fell over and broke all the furniture.

Yo! Its been

Me, all along

Joined
14 Jan 07
Moves
63574
16 Oct 08

Originally posted by Millwall Bill
The Lord Of The Rings trilogy
Lord of the rings? What could you have against that? What didn't it deliver on?

King Kong and Mulian Rouge.

C
Not Aleister

Control room

Joined
17 Apr 02
Moves
91813
16 Oct 08

Originally posted by Seitse
nerds ... Dorito-fat-asses and unattractive face acne
I'd say this is the most over-used type of exaggeration of the average nerd, yes.

Lord

Sewers of Holland

Joined
31 Jan 04
Moves
88084
16 Oct 08

Originally posted by Arachnarchist
NO WAY!!! The dark knight rocked.

I gotta go with Star Wars I-III
Wait a minute...

The dark knight: "OOOOHHHH.. we have to give the dead actor junkie a post-mortum Oscar...." BECAUSE HE GIGGLES A LOT???

Is less hyped and a better film than Star Wars episode II or III?

I think you've just rolled out of a tumble dryer and got your nuts caught in loose zip or something. You need help.

Lord

Sewers of Holland

Joined
31 Jan 04
Moves
88084
16 Oct 08

Originally posted by yo its me
Lord of the rings? What could you have against that? What didn't it deliver on?

Well... Tom Bombadil springs to mind. The film portrays wizards as either good or evil, but the book has the Maia not being such black/white characters. Tom Bombadil's character could have brought a much needed subtlety to the film.

The scouring of the Shire was missed. Especially poor since you did see it in Part I as an alternative future in Galadriel's mirror.

The extended version of "The two towers" did make amends to the butchery committed in the cinema release though. That's true.
And I certainly agree it wasn't the most over-hyped film ever for what you got.

Lord

Sewers of Holland

Joined
31 Jan 04
Moves
88084
16 Oct 08

Originally posted by lordhighgus
As two other posters have said, "Titanic" bites the big one.
The only other movie that was that bad was "Shock Treatment", the sequel to "Rocky Horror Picture Show".
Titanic wasn't bad.
It certianly wasn't as good as people made it out to be, but it wasn't as bad as the alternative pretentious crowd make out either.

dsR

Big D

Joined
13 Dec 05
Moves
26380
21 Oct 08

Just watched Woody Allen's "Annie Hall," about a nebbish, neurotic, New York City Jew who winds up instructing dumb, goofy, corn-fed Mid-western shiksa Diane Keaton in the ways of life, love and philosophy. This piece of crap won Oscars for Best Picture, Screenplay, Direction and Best Actress in 1977, which must have been a dismal year for cinema. This is my new "most over-rated film ever."

W
Instant Buzz

C#minor

Joined
28 Feb 05
Moves
16344
21 Oct 08
1 edit

Originally posted by der schwarze Ritter
Just watched Woody Allen's "Annie Hall," about a nebbish, neurotic, New York City Jew who winds up instructing dumb, goofy, corn-fed Mid-western shiksa Diane Keaton in the ways of life, love and philosophy. This piece of crap won Oscars for Best Picture, Screenplay, Direction and Best Actress in 1977, which must have been a dismal year for cinema. This is my new "most over-rated film ever."
I certainly agree with The Dark Knight being one of the most boring films ever made. Not only was the script laughable ((stern look) Ohhh I think it´s so wrong to be able to eves drop using everybody´s phone, but as it´s you, go head) but the plot was nonsense. Accidently leaving a very important political figure in a hospital that the police had just evacuated who inexplicably didn´t die when it blew up etc etc etc.

I also found Lord of the Rings unbelievably tedious too but I guess that´s OK because the book is pretty dull and is only navigable by skimming over the fifty page descriptions of a bit of pathway.

I´m also with those who think 2001 was stoopid. It was quite cool for a while and I´ve heard all the theories about what the hell is going down at the end but can only conclude that in fact the only things going were horrendous quantities of class A drugs when they made that.

However, I´d like to nominate "There will be blood". Total clap trap form a director who plainly thinks that moodily lit people not saying anything for five minutes is high art.

Joined
15 Jul 06
Moves
3509
22 Oct 08

Originally posted by Wheely
I

I´m also with those who think 2001 was stoopid. It was quite cool for a while and I´ve heard all the theories about what the hell is going down at the end but can only conclude that in fact the only things going were horrendous quantities of class A drugs when they made that.

However, I´d like to nominate "There will be blood". Total clap trap form ...[text shortened]... r who plainly thinks that moodily lit people not saying anything for five minutes is high art.
Not necessarily defending 2001 but Clarke does explain everything in 2010 (the book; I'm not sure if the movie is too clear on explanations although it does follow the book). Everything is explained. Why HAL murdered the astronauts, what happened to David Bowman and why. It is so seamless he must have planned it that way. And much of 2001 was prescient of the space programs future. However, yes, the ending did seem like the director was just using recreational drugs at the time.

Vampyroteuthis

Infernalis

Joined
13 Apr 04
Moves
99671
22 Oct 08

Originally posted by der schwarze Ritter
Just watched Woody Allen's "Annie Hall," about a nebbish, neurotic, New York City Jew who winds up instructing dumb, goofy, corn-fed Mid-western shiksa Diane Keaton in the ways of life, love and philosophy. This piece of crap won Oscars for Best Picture, Screenplay, Direction and Best Actress in 1977, which must have been a dismal year for cinema. This is my new "most over-rated film ever."
One of the best movies of all time.

dsR

Big D

Joined
13 Dec 05
Moves
26380
23 Oct 08

Originally posted by rbmorris
One of the best movies of all time.
Defend your assertion.

i

Joined
26 Jun 06
Moves
59283
23 Oct 08

Originally posted by der schwarze Ritter
Just watched Woody Allen's "Annie Hall," about a nebbish, neurotic, New York City Jew who winds up instructing dumb, goofy, corn-fed Mid-western shiksa Diane Keaton in the ways of life, love and philosophy. This piece of crap won Oscars for Best Picture, Screenplay, Direction and Best Actress in 1977, which must have been a dismal year for cinema. This is my new "most over-rated film ever."
WTF?!

i agree with you for the 1st time 😲

Lord

Sewers of Holland

Joined
31 Jan 04
Moves
88084
27 Oct 08

Originally posted by der schwarze Ritter
Just watched Woody Allen's "Annie Hall," about a nebbish, neurotic, New York City Jew who winds up instructing dumb, goofy, corn-fed Mid-western shiksa Diane Keaton in the ways of life, love and philosophy. This piece of crap won Oscars for Best Picture, Screenplay, Direction and Best Actress in 1977, which must have been a dismal year for cinema. This is my new "most over-rated film ever."
1977 was a briliant year for movies!

Star Wars, Close encounters of the third kind, The spy who loved me, A bridge too far, Soldaat van Oranje (one of the best Dutch films ever) and Madame Rosa.

In fact, I would go as far as to say that only 1994 surpasses 1997 for quality of movies...

Well, perhaps...

P

weedhopper

Joined
25 Jul 07
Moves
8096
27 Oct 08

Originally posted by der schwarze Ritter
Just watched Woody Allen's "Annie Hall," about a nebbish, neurotic, New York City Jew who winds up instructing dumb, goofy, corn-fed Mid-western shiksa Diane Keaton in the ways of life, love and philosophy. This piece of crap won Oscars for Best Picture, Screenplay, Direction and Best Actress in 1977, which must have been a dismal year for cinema. This is my new "most over-rated film ever."
agreed

C
Don't Fear Me

Reaping

Joined
28 Feb 07
Moves
655
27 Oct 08

Originally posted by shavixmir
1994
Because of "Pulp Fiction" or "Natural Born Killers"?