Suggestion regarding Dustnrogers

Suggestion regarding Dustnrogers

Tournaments

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.

and RedHotTed

Red Hot Rebel Clan

Joined
06 Apr 01
Moves
234504
02 Aug 02

There's something very strange about this guy's behaviour...
July 28th he signs up for the tourney. Same day he gets his rating
boosted by 2 x three moves game resignations by Nikki Rogers.
Despite having 145 games on the go at that time he's just letting
them all timeout - now he's in the 1100's and falling...

Are we absolutely sure that someone else hasn't got access to his nick
and that it was in fact dustn himself that signed up for the tornament?

The moves made in the games around that time are a bit weird...
Just one example would be game no.96224 which was finely balanced
but which he resigned.. why?

My suggestion is this: seeing as how dustnrogers has plainly left the
building shouldn't he be expelled from the tournament and perhaps
we could promote, say, Vaksno (who hasn't got an opponent in the
1200's) to replace him? What do you think folks?

Rhymester

The Ambassador

Charleston SC. USA

Joined
17 Jun 01
Moves
141759
02 Aug 02

Andrew,
Here is what I know about Dustnrogers. Somewhere else in the
forum someone wrote that Dustnrogers was Unexperienced player. I
have knowledge that Unexpererienced player is also Final Conquest.
I've played all three nicks. I would not mind playing anyone without an
opponent. In Dustnrogers case, I think his opponents should just
timeout on him/her when the flag comes up.
John
Assistant TD Baker Invitational Knockout Tournament (Top Division)

and RedHotTed

Red Hot Rebel Clan

Joined
06 Apr 01
Moves
234504
02 Aug 02

Surely timeouts can't be the answer if a player isn't even around to
start the games?

S
The Diplomat

Slightly Left :D

Joined
22 Jun 01
Moves
8518
02 Aug 02