Young Earth is impossible:

Young Earth is impossible:

Spirituality

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.

The Near Genius

Fort Gordon

Joined
24 Jan 11
Moves
13644
16 May 14

Originally posted by Zahlanzi
it has nothing to do with science as well, but that didn't stop you.
Well, you forget that this is the Spirituality Forum.

s
Fast and Curious

slatington, pa, usa

Joined
28 Dec 04
Moves
53223
16 May 14

Originally posted by RJHinds
Well, you forget that this is the Spirituality Forum.
So why are you bothering to try to post pseudoscientific nonsense then instead of just 'Goddidid'?

The Near Genius

Fort Gordon

Joined
24 Jan 11
Moves
13644
17 May 14

Originally posted by sonhouse
So why are you bothering to try to post pseudoscientific nonsense then instead of just 'Goddidid'?
I am posting real scientific information along with God did it, because you guys post pseudoscientific nonsense, like evolution and millions and billions of years.

s
Fast and Curious

slatington, pa, usa

Joined
28 Dec 04
Moves
53223
17 May 14

Originally posted by RJHinds
I am posting real scientific information along with God did it, because you guys post pseudoscientific nonsense, like evolution and millions and billions of years.
Well there you have it folks, the last 400 years of scientific development is now just pseudoscience.

It MUST be since RJ has pronounced it so, being the god of science he is and therefore knows EVERYTHING about ALL sciences and is therefore well justified to be making these pronouncements.

The Near Genius

Fort Gordon

Joined
24 Jan 11
Moves
13644
17 May 14

Originally posted by sonhouse
Well there you have it folks, the last 400 years of scientific development is now just pseudoscience.

It MUST be since RJ has pronounced it so, being the god of science he is and therefore knows EVERYTHING about ALL sciences and is therefore well justified to be making these pronouncements.
How do you get 400 years when Darwin only started his evolution theory in the 1850s?

s
Fast and Curious

slatington, pa, usa

Joined
28 Dec 04
Moves
53223
17 May 14

Originally posted by RJHinds
How do you get 400 years when Darwin only started his evolution theory in the 1850s?
You are rejecting many other sciences besides Darwin. The whole history of geology is bogus to you, same with astronomy, genetics, dendrochronology, relativity, time stretching and folding, space bendable.

Many sciences are on your hit list and some of them are hundreds of years old with thousands of verified experiments backing them up.

You don't even believe the speed of light is constant.

The Near Genius

Fort Gordon

Joined
24 Jan 11
Moves
13644
17 May 14

Originally posted by sonhouse
You are rejecting many other sciences besides Darwin. The whole history of geology is bogus to you, same with astronomy, genetics, dendrochronology, relativity, time stretching and folding, space bendable.

Many sciences are on your hit list and some of them are hundreds of years old with thousands of verified experiments backing them up.

You don't even believe the speed of light is constant.
I don't reject any of the real sciences. I only reject the stupid ideas of evolution scientists and the evolution fraud.

Why there is no evidence for Darwins theory of evolution

s
Fast and Curious

slatington, pa, usa

Joined
28 Dec 04
Moves
53223
17 May 14

Originally posted by RJHinds
I don't reject any of the real sciences. I only reject the stupid ideas of evolution scientists and the evolution fraud.

Why there is no evidence for Darwins theory of evolution

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rNXLT8h_fIo
Yes you DO reject many other sciences because a lot of them say rocks are billions of years old, the science that does that is NOT evolution it is in the field of geology. You reject the data that says the universe is 14 billion years old which comes not from evolution but astronomy.

You reject the math used, it is obviously bogus, which is not evolution, you reject biochemistry which is not evolution when it supports it.
You reject the scientific method, Karl Popper and all that when it supports evolution but that is not evolution.

So you reject ALL those sciences. Period. You do not have the scientific authority to say what part of a science is bogus and what is genuine because you are not a scientist you are a YEC living in the 10th century in your mind.

The Near Genius

Fort Gordon

Joined
24 Jan 11
Moves
13644
18 May 14
1 edit

Originally posted by sonhouse
Yes you DO reject many other sciences because a lot of them say rocks are billions of years old, the science that does that is NOT evolution it is in the field of geology. You reject the data that says the universe is 14 billion years old which comes not from evolution but astronomy.

You reject the math used, it is obviously bogus, which is not evolution ...[text shortened]... s genuine because you are not a scientist you are a YEC living in the 10th century in your mind.
Not all geologists or biochemists reject young earth creation. I have given you many references to lectures by those type scientists. Here is another one from a geologist:

Creation Geology: The Key To Unraveling Earth History

Can't win a game of

38N Lat X 121W Lon

Joined
03 Apr 03
Moves
154938
20 May 14
1 edit

Parallax a form of Geometry .........Read up on it RJ. actually you can see Parallax at very short distances with our eyes


Manny

Can't win a game of

38N Lat X 121W Lon

Joined
03 Apr 03
Moves
154938
20 May 14

I think the redshift argument can be used by YECers it's fair ......The universe however is still stretching or expanding and even accelerating


Manny

The Near Genius

Fort Gordon

Joined
24 Jan 11
Moves
13644
20 May 14
1 edit

Originally posted by menace71
Parallax a form of Geometry .........Read up on it RJ. actually you can see Parallax at very short distances with our eyes


Manny
Yes I know that it is used to try to determine the distance from earth to other bodies in the universe by triangulation.

Z

Joined
04 Feb 05
Moves
29132
20 May 14

Originally posted by RJHinds
How do you get 400 years when Darwin only started his evolution theory in the 1850s?
darwin didn't invent his theory, he based it on previous knowledge.

afterwards we refined his theories and added to that knowledge. today you don't have darwinian evolution, you have evolution. better explained and even better proven.

don't you understand? this is not up for debate. we are making fun of you. you don't get to have an opinion, of dismissing it because you and other ignoramuses like you find it hard to grasp. we only have a problem when you invade schools and try to pass your utter garbage on children.

you are in the minority here and you will soon be extinct. survival of the fittest, and your kind cannot compete with a more intelligent, better informed human.

R
Standard memberRemoved

Joined
03 Jan 13
Moves
13080
20 May 14
4 edits

misplaced post.

The Near Genius

Fort Gordon

Joined
24 Jan 11
Moves
13644
21 May 14
1 edit

Originally posted by Zahlanzi
darwin didn't invent his theory, he based it on previous knowledge.

afterwards we refined his theories and added to that knowledge. today you don't have darwinian evolution, you have evolution. better explained and even better proven.

don't you understand? this is not up for debate. we are making fun of you. you don't get to have an opinion, of dism ...[text shortened]... val of the fittest, and your kind cannot compete with a more intelligent, better informed human.
You have been brainwashed to believe the lie of the theory of evolution. Some of us believe it is time for the truth to be told to our children. Santa Claus and the Easter Bunny fairy tales are relatively harmless lies in comparison to the fairy tale told in the story of evolution.

The following link you can read about the lie of evolution compared with the truth of creation:

http://www.fillthevoid.org/Creation/Hovind/Brainwashed.html