world population

Originally posted by Eladar
His was self confessed, yours is name calling.

Mine was directed at a hypothetical fish. Your reading comprehension is abysmal as usual.
My guess is your brain is incapable of understanding hypotheticals, although fake news doesn't bother you in the least.

Originally posted by Eladar
His was self confessed, yours is name calling.

I can live with that.

Originally posted by karoly aczel
apparently we are using up the planet. Countless documentaries tell me so. Forget climate change. We're going have to eat each other to survive.
Is god planning a huge cull? Ideas?

As for world population and food. There is no excuse for growing food. Any lack of doing so is just plain poor planning and peoples geed. I look at the areas in America that are void of vegetation, as in Nevada, New Mexico, Wyoming and so on. We have the tech, knowledge, and capability to transform this land. Why not use it.

Originally posted by Eladar
You are an antichristian libtard. You are both predictable and ignorant of things beyond your ideological beliefs.

Hang around long enough and I will enlighten you on more things than just Christian beliefs.

Arrogant much?

Originally posted by twhitehead
Errr. No. Paranoid, delusional fish.

(that is not directed at any poster, but at the scenario that I invented in which a fish worries about the oceans drying up).

What? A fish trying to find out the limits of it's ocean is paranoid or delusional? C'mon

Originally posted by Pudgenik
As for world population and food. There is no excuse for growing food. Any lack of doing so is just plain poor planning and peoples geed. I look at the areas in America that are void of vegetation, as in Nevada, New Mexico, Wyoming and so on. We have the tech, knowledge, and capability to transform this land. Why not use it.

I once mentioned that a lot of Australia could be transformed as well. One poster asked who was going to lay down all that infrastructure, and would I personally roll up my sleeves and help?

You bet I would

Originally posted by karoly aczel
I once mentioned that a lot of Australia could be transformed as well. One poster asked who was going to lay down all that infrastructure, and would I personally roll up my sleeves and help?

You bet I would

I hear you.

When I hear all the BS about over population, running out of water and so on, I just roll my eyes

Originally posted by Pudgenik
I hear you.

When I hear all the BS about over population, running out of water and so on, I just roll my eyes

Yep, lets start building some desalination plants and laying down some pipes..

Originally posted by karoly aczel
Yep, lets start building some desalination plants and laying down some pipes..

I have often thought that California could kill two birds with one stone, so to speak. A few desalination plants. Sell some of the water to Las Vegas. It would stop the fight between the ranchers and Las Vegas. It would pay for the plants, and they would have the water for all the farming done in the area

Originally posted by Pudgenik
I hear you.

When I hear all the BS about over population, running out of water and so on, I just roll my eyes

I don't think it's all BS.
Have you seen the population curve?

Another 2 billion tipped to be born by 2050. All those people will have to be fed

Originally posted by karoly aczel
I don't think it's all BS.
Have you seen the population curve?

Another 2 billion tipped to be born by 2050. All those people will have to be fed

Nature has a way of dealing with this without evil people trying to choose who to allow to live and who is not.

Originally posted by avalanchethecat
I don't expect you to question your scripture. I don't think you are capable of that.

I don't expect you to question your golden rule. I don't think you are capable of that because it's an absolute you keep on running away from.

Originally posted by FMF
I don't need to. Far-fetched figments of your imagination place no onus whatsoever on me to prove anything to you. How very puffed up of you to think they do.

Of course since you are only an infinite sceptic who takes no position apart from a 'gut feeling' you only have the right to attack everyone else's beliefs and don't have to defend your own since it's only have a 'gut feeling'.

Originally posted by Fetchmyjunk
Of course since you are only an infinite sceptic who takes no position apart from a 'gut feeling' you only have the right to attack everyone else's beliefs and don't have to defend your own since it's only have a 'gut feeling'.

If you claim there is a supernatural creature of some kind that has communicated its wishes to you, the onus is on you to prove it.

Originally posted by FMF
If you claim there is a supernatural creature of some kind that has communicated its wishes to you, the onus is on you to prove it.

All you have for your belief is a gut feeling, and this is enough for you. Yet you demand proof from me. Hypocritical don't you think?