02 Oct 12
Originally posted by AgergOr such a being has put all the evidence in front of you and you refuse to look at
Well if we're talking about an omniscient, omnipotent creator (and correct me if you refer to just any old creator entity) then there is no need for me to state what I would accept as evidence - such a being would already know. Moreover, given that any evidence presented so far has been insufficient, one of the following is true:
a) Such an entity withholds ...[text shortened]... e somehow (otherwise, by omnipotence, we have situation (a))
c) Such an entity doesn't exist
it.
Kelly
02 Oct 12
1 edit
Originally posted by KellyJayThis coming from someone who thinks eight people lived on a boat with a load of vegetarian dinosaurs a few thousand years ago whilst God flooded the entire planet killing everything is a trifle rich.
Or such a being has put all the evidence in front of you and you refuse to look at
it.
Kelly
02 Oct 12
Originally posted by Proper KnobYep, I guess that makes you someone who believes everything came from nothing
This coming from someone who thinks eight people lived on a boat with a load of vegetarian dinosaurs a few thousand years ago whilst God flooded the entire planet killing everything is a trifle rich.
and then after everything came from nothing it just connected itself in such away
that we have life and two people can talk to one another on computers. 🙂
Kelly
02 Oct 12
1 edit
Originally posted by Proper KnobLol, from some who believes that life is the product of inanimate matter cooked up in a
This coming from someone who thinks eight people lived on a boat with a load of vegetarian dinosaurs a few thousand years ago whilst God flooded the entire planet killing everything is a trifle rich.
pre biotic soup which diversified into fish, amphibians, reptiles, birds and mammals, not
to mention plants and that said fish walked out of the water and started to breath, talk
and become rational is more trifle rich than a trifle factory near trifleingham which
specialises in brandy soaked tiramisu trifle cakes!
- Joined
- 16 Jan 07
- Moves
- 95105
02 Oct 12
Originally posted by KellyJayjust to clarify so you dont make the same mistake again - atheist do not believe the universe came from nothing.
Yep, I guess that makes you someone who believes everything came from nothing
and then after everything came from nothing it just connected itself in such away
that we have life and two people can talk to one another on computers. 🙂
Kelly
- Joined
- 16 Jan 07
- Moves
- 95105
02 Oct 12
Originally posted by robbie carrobiethe difference is, evolution from inanimate matter is improbable and noahs ark is impossible.
Lol, from some who believes that life is the product of inanimate matter cooked up in a
pre biotic soup which diversified into fish, amphibians, reptiles, birds and mammals, not
to mention plants and that said fish walked out of the water and started to breath, talk
and become rational is more trifle rich than a trifle factory near trifleingham which
specialises in brandy soaked tiramisu trifle cakes!
id go for improbable over impossible every time.
02 Oct 12
Originally posted by menace71Puddle - hole
I just can't accept this all happened by chance or accident. I think it's mathematically impossible. If one of the 4 (5) fundamental forces of the universe were different we would not exist. If the solar system were different we would not exist. Too close to our star we fry too far we freeze. Our natural satellite right distance and helps provide tides an ...[text shortened]... niverse doesn't play dice" The universal equation of everything is God I believe.
Manny
- Joined
- 16 Jan 07
- Moves
- 95105
02 Oct 12
1 edit
the goldilocks argument doesnt work. imagine if there was a earth lottery where everybody entered to win money. 7 billion people enter and you win. would you refuse to accept you won on the basis it was highly improbable that the condition for you to win happened?
02 Oct 12
Originally posted by KellyJayEverything came from nothing? No.
Yep, I guess that makes you someone who believes everything came from nothing
and then after everything came from nothing it just connected itself in such away
that we have life and two people can talk to one another on computers. 🙂
Kelly
Originally posted by robbie carrobieThat's right Rob, and i came to conclusion after reading numerous books on the topic and evaluating the evidence with my own mind. Remember, this was something you professed to do until it was discovered that you actually did no such thing. Not only did you do no such thing, you have no intention of doing any such thing.
Lol, from some who believes that life is the product of inanimate matter cooked up in a
pre biotic soup which diversified into fish, amphibians, reptiles, birds and mammals, not
to mention plants and that said fish walked out of the water and started to breath, talk
and become rational is more trifle rich than a trifle factory near trifleingham which
specialises in brandy soaked tiramisu trifle cakes!
02 Oct 12
Originally posted by stellspalfieExcept when you are applying said odds to life starting from non-living material
the goldilocks argument doesnt work. imagine if there was a earth lottery where everybody entered to win money. 7 billion people enter and you win. would you refuse to accept you won on the basis it was highly improbable that the condition for you to win happened?
you just granted it is possible when you do not know that for a fact. You also
don't know for a fact that life changed from a one cell into all the life we see
today, but people put odds on as if its a sure thing.
Kelly
02 Oct 12
Originally posted by stellspalfieWhere do you think everything came from, since its been dated as its so old that
just to clarify so you dont make the same mistake again - atheist do not believe the universe came from nothing.
means it had a beginning, or do you instead of calling God one who lives forever
now claim the universe does?
Kelly