"We"

Spirituality

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.

c

Joined
26 Dec 14
Moves
35596
30 Oct 18

Genesis 1:26 and 3:22.

Plurals. Comments?

Joined
16 Feb 08
Moves
116952
30 Oct 18

@chaney3 said
Genesis 1:26 and 3:22.

Plurals. Comments?
Do we have to look the scriptures up or just guess?

Which translations?

c

Joined
26 Dec 14
Moves
35596
30 Oct 18

@divegeester said
Do we have to look the scriptures up or just guess?

Which translations?
Do you own a bible?
Can't you just look?

Sorry, I was rushed for time at that moment, but still wanted to discuss.

Resident of Planet X

The Ghost Chamber

Joined
14 Mar 15
Moves
28730
30 Oct 18

@chaney3 said
Genesis 1:26 and 3:22.

Plurals. Comments?
“We are not amused.” - Queen Victoria.

Was the Queen indicating there was more than one of her?

R
Standard memberRemoved

Joined
03 Jan 13
Moves
13080
30 Oct 18
2 edits

I think to start to solve this problem you have to begin with process of elimination.

Who besides God Himself was involved in the creation of man ? Consult other portions of the Bible for help on the question.

"And God said, Let us make man in our image, ... "( v.26a)

So God created man in His own image, . .." (v.27a)


1.) Could God have been talking about Himself and angels?
2.) Could God have been talking about Himself and another god or gods?

Misfit Queen

Isle of Misfit Toys

Joined
08 Aug 03
Moves
36681
30 Oct 18

@ghost-of-a-duke said
“We are not amused.” - Queen Victoria.

Was the Queen indicating there was more than one of her?
Contrary to many in the British Isles, the Queen is not God.

Misfit Queen

Isle of Misfit Toys

Joined
08 Aug 03
Moves
36681
30 Oct 18

@chaney3 said
Genesis 1:26 and 3:22.

Plurals. Comments?
For clarity, please see John 1:1.

c

Joined
26 Dec 14
Moves
35596
30 Oct 18

@suzianne said
Contrary to many in the British Isles, the Queen is not God.
Yeah!!! That's right!!!

You tell him supergirl.

c

Joined
26 Dec 14
Moves
35596
30 Oct 18

@suzianne said
For clarity, please see John 1:1.
The Trinity is your answer?

R
Standard memberRemoved

Joined
03 Jan 13
Moves
13080
30 Oct 18

@chaney3

There is no "We" there.
There is an "Us".

In Isaiah 6 you have a "We" in God's speaking.

R
Standard memberRemoved

Joined
03 Jan 13
Moves
13080
30 Oct 18
4 edits

@sonship

In Isaiah 6 you have a "We" in God's speaking.

I am wrong.

Correction: There is no mention of "We" in Isaiah 6.

Don't some of you check to verify when someone says something is in the Bible ?
"Also I heard the voice of the Lord, saying, Whom shall I send, and who will go for us? "(Isa.6:8)

Somebody should double check for themselves.

Misfit Queen

Isle of Misfit Toys

Joined
08 Aug 03
Moves
36681
30 Oct 18

@chaney3 said
The Trinity is your answer?
This is what makes Elohim plural.

T

Joined
15 Oct 06
Moves
10115
31 Oct 18
2 edits

@suzianne said
This is what makes Elohim plural.
Evidently such a claim is due to a desire to "prove" the trinity and an ignorance of Hebrew. The following are small snippets from a rather lengthy explanation of why the claim is false:
It would be difficult to imagine a doctrine more hostile to the uncompromising monotheism preached in the Jewish Scriptures than the Christian claim that there is a plurality within the divine nature of God. Yet, armed with little knowledge of the Hebrew language, many Trinitarians brazenly argue that the name of God, as it appears in the first verse in the Bible, “proves” there are three distinct Persons in the godhead...

The word Elohim possesses a plural intensive syntax and is singular in meaning. In Hebrew, the suffix ים (im), mainly indicates a masculine plural. However with Elohim the construction is grammatically singular, (i.e. it governs a singular verb or adjective) when referring to the God of Israel, but grammatically plural elohim (i.e. taking a plural verb or adjective) when used of pagan divinities (Psalms 96:5; 97:7).

This is self-evident from the fact that the verb “created” בָּרָה (bara) in Genesis 1:1 is in the singular. This linguistic pattern is well known and widely used throughout the Jewish Scriptures. For example, I am certain that many readers are familiar with the Hebrew word חַיִים (chayim), meaning “life.” Notice that this word contains the identical plural suffix “im,” as inElohim, yet it repeatedly means “life”, in the singular, throughout the Bible...

https://outreachjudaism.org/elohim-plural/

Misfit Queen

Isle of Misfit Toys

Joined
08 Aug 03
Moves
36681
31 Oct 18
3 edits

@thinkofone said
Evidently such a claim is due to a desire to "prove" the trinity and an ignorance of Hebrew. The following are small snippets from a rather lengthy explanation of why the claim is false:
It would be difficult to imagine a doctrine more hostile to the uncompromising monotheism preached in the Jewish Scriptures than the Christian claim that there is a plurality withi ...[text shortened]... ”, in the singular, throughout the Bible...

https://outreachjudaism.org/elohim-plural/
Actually your quote supports my claim, for the Triune God is one God in three offices. One God (singular verb), yet Hebrew plural masculine name.

The same is with chayim, one speaks of all life (plural) and yet one uses singular verb with it. As in "All life is..." This grammar example is not rare, nor nonsensical.

R
Standard memberRemoved

Joined
03 Jan 13
Moves
13080
31 Oct 18
1 edit

@ThinkOfOne

The word Elohim possesses a plural intensive syntax and is singular in meaning.


And some scholars who DO read and translate ancient Hebrew
say that the Triune God was being indicated is logical.
Any attempt to say all such readers only do so because they know no Hebrew will fail as an effective argument.

I am awaiting a reply from JewsForJesus on ELohim and Genesis 1:26,27.