The Worst Argument Against Evolution

The Worst Argument Against Evolution

Spirituality

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.

s
Fast and Curious

slatington, pa, usa

Joined
28 Dec 04
Moves
53223
30 Jul 08
1 edit

Originally posted by Andrew Hamilton
That is pretty horrendous and yet funny 🙂

For the tiny idiot minority that just might think the video has a point:

1, evolution theory says nothing about the creation of life, only on how more complex life forms developed from simpler life forms.

2, scientists don’t claim that if a mass of organic chemicals and energy come together that li ...[text shortened]... of conditions that are not replicated in the modern day -and certainly not by the food industry!
And there is the possibility our form of life didn't even originate on this planet, the latest is maybe life was brought here from Venus by solar winds scouring the upper atmosphere where life had formed before anything was living on earth. Of course that still begs the question of where life came from originally and then there is the Hoyle theory, life or pre-life molecules seeding the whole solar system from some organic filled cloud silently and invisibly wafting through our solar system depositing organic soup on the newbie earth, maybe making conditions right for Europa, Titan, Earth, Mars, and Venus in one swell foop. But of course it's all those cursed evolutionists who says all that, right!🙂
What does it take for creationists to get it into their so-called minds evolutionists say absolutely nothing about the origin of life, which in science is the ballywack of the cosmologists (I think)
I know they deal with the formation of the universe and such but I think they cover the origin of life question, correct me if I am wrong. Anyway whoever does that, it's not the evolutionist.

Insanity at Masada

tinyurl.com/mw7txe34

Joined
23 Aug 04
Moves
26660
30 Jul 08

Here's a contender, but I'm not sure this counts as a new idea...just an old one expressed by an idiot.

Insanity at Masada

tinyurl.com/mw7txe34

Joined
23 Aug 04
Moves
26660
31 Jul 08
2 edits

This fellow seems to be saying that one plate was subducting under another in the mid-Atlantic when Europe and Africa broke from the Americas when Pangaea broke up. But the two land masses were separating...subduction happens when they come together, right?

He also says sedimentary rock layers must have been laid quickly, one after the other, because the layers didn't get worn out before the next layer was laid.

&feature=related

BWA Soldier

Tha Brotha Hood

Joined
13 Dec 04
Moves
49088
31 Jul 08

Originally posted by AThousandYoung
Here's a contender, but I'm not sure this counts as a new idea...just an old one expressed by an idiot.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uIopoXUyyq4
Those rhymes were so tight, I forgot to follow the argument. I've never heard Christian music with so much profanity in it.

Insanity at Masada

tinyurl.com/mw7txe34

Joined
23 Aug 04
Moves
26660
31 Jul 08

Originally posted by DoctorScribbles
Those rhymes were so tight, I forgot to follow the argument. I've never heard Christian music with so much profanity in it.
"If evolution's true, how come gravity's just right for us, it's just the right temperature, we don't get burned by the sun or frozen"

That thing about the sun...tell that to my Irish pasty white back as it sizzles and bubbles with second degree burns due to a long birthday at Raging Waters...

Well, that was a long time ago, but still.