The Council of Nicea

The Council of Nicea

Spirituality

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Walk your Faith

USA

Joined
24 May 04
Moves
158338
19 Dec 22

@chaney3 said
This is NOT in the Bible.
Actually that is in the Bible, you should read it.

c

Joined
26 Dec 14
Moves
35596
19 Dec 22

@divegeester said
Jesus said:

“When you have seen me, you have seen the Father”

Pretty clear.
I am not willing to concede that Jesus is God, based on that statement.

Jesus referred to God as the Father.
Hundreds of times.

c

Joined
26 Dec 14
Moves
35596
19 Dec 22

@kellyjay said
Actually that is in the Bible, you should read it.
The Trinity is NOT in the Bible.

Kali

PenTesting

Joined
04 Apr 04
Moves
252648
19 Dec 22

@chaney3 said
The Trinity is NOT in the Bible.
Anytime doctrines are not clearly taught in the bible, it can only mean one thing, and that is that it is not critical for ones eternal life. The wise man will shy away from picking any one side and instead focus on doctrines that are in fact clearly taught and which are essential for life.

The Trinity is not in the bible and neither is it an important doctrine. Those who focus on taking sides here have gone astray.

Über-Nerd

Joined
31 May 12
Moves
8467
19 Dec 22
3 edits

@divegeester said
There is ample biblical evidence that he did, at the very least, strongly infer it.
It was the Council of Nicea which chose precisely those scrolls to canonize, the ones which identified Jesus with the godhead, and destroyed the other gospels. Fortunately, a cache of other gospels did survive, and have been published as the Nag Hamadi Library. Every Christian should read them and thoroughly digest the alternative Christianities presented therein.

F

Joined
28 Oct 05
Moves
34587
19 Dec 22

@bigdogg said
Seems like this started to happen before the Council. The Gospel of John, which was the last of the 4, pushes pretty hard for deification of Jesus.
This was clearly the intention of the writers who concocted the ideology and then named it after "John".

Secret RHP coder

on the payroll

Joined
26 Nov 04
Moves
155080
19 Dec 22

@chaney3 said
But why?
Jesus never made the claim Himself.
If you spin a narrative the right way, you gain influence over its believers.

That particular spin caught on big time.

Walk your Faith

USA

Joined
24 May 04
Moves
158338
20 Dec 22

@chaney3 said
The Trinity is NOT in the Bible.
Did you see me use the word, Trinity?

Über-Nerd

Joined
31 May 12
Moves
8467
20 Dec 22
1 edit

@bigdogg said
If you spin a narrative the right way, you gain influence over its believers.

That particular spin caught on big time.
The people who wanted very much to gain influence were, quite obviously, the Roman bishops. They had a purely political agenda, nothing to do with saving souls. Christians had been persecuted, off and on, for three hundred years, when, all of a sudden, Constantine has a dream, his court interpreters, among them a Christian, give him various interpretations, and lo and behold, the Christian’s interpretation comes true. In gratitude, Constantine declares Christianity the state religion. The Roman bishops found themselves within inches of getting their fingers on the levers of power of the greatest civilization the world had seen up to that time, and they grabbed the opportunity with both hands to cement their power by canonizing the scrolls which supported THEIR position as God’s chosen ministers on Earth. A prize worth telling some fibs for. The spin did not somehow “catch on”; it was forced upon people by a cadre of power hungry bishops who immediately set about persecuting all the Christian variants which disagreed with their interpretation of the Jesus legend (and there were many at that time, alternative Christianities).

Who had the most to gain if the belief should become widespread that Jesus was God? Precisely those who would later claim that one cannot have God for the father if he does not have the church (the Roman catholic church) for his mother.

Look at the scrolls they consigned to oblivion: the Gospel of Thomas for example makes no reference to miracles, no virgin birth, no resurrection, no association much less identification with the godhead; just ostensibly verbatim questions the apostles had asked and Jesus’s answers to them.

ENGLAND

Joined
16 Feb 08
Moves
117642
20 Dec 22

@chaney3 said
I am not willing to concede that Jesus is God, based on that statement.
No one is asking you to.

You asserted that in the bible Jesus never made the claim that he was God; I’ve just shown you that you are mistaken.

ENGLAND

Joined
16 Feb 08
Moves
117642
20 Dec 22

@chaney3 said
This is NOT in the Bible.
You are correct with this.

ENGLAND

Joined
16 Feb 08
Moves
117642
20 Dec 22

@kellyjay said
Did you see me use the word, Trinity?
“God in three persons” is also not in the bible.

Like the strangely capitalised “Trinity” it is made up.

ENGLAND

Joined
16 Feb 08
Moves
117642
20 Dec 22
1 edit

@moonbus said
The Roman bishops found themselves within inches of getting their fingers on the levers of power of the greatest civilization the world had seen up to that time, and they grabbed the opportunity with both hands to cement their power by canonizing the scrolls which supported THEIR position as God’s chosen ministers on Earth. A prize worth telling some fibs for. The spin did no ...[text shortened]... r interpretation of the Jesus legend (and there were many at that time, alternative Christianities).
And so began the Roman Catholic Church, the mother of all the harlot churches and denominations down the centuries.

Jesus said “I will write my law on their hearts”.
For me this is one of the most powerful texts in the Bible.

Über-Nerd

Joined
31 May 12
Moves
8467
20 Dec 22

@divegeester said
“God in three persons” is also not in the bible.

Like the strangely capitalised “Trinity” it is made up.
Kelly is a Bible worshipper. Not a worshipper of God. ‘Nuf said.

Do some historical research. Find out how and when the NT came to be. It will answer many of your questions (none of which Kelly will ever be able to).

ENGLAND

Joined
16 Feb 08
Moves
117642
20 Dec 22

@moonbus said
Kelly is a Bible worshipper. Not a worshipper of God.
I’ve pointed out to him several times that faith in the bible rather than faith in God/Christ is a form of idolatry.