- Joined
- 16 Feb 08
- Moves
- 116939
24 Jan 11
Originally posted by vishvahetuThe Bible is not fabricated, the Vedas are however; bogus and dishonest.
Its just that you said quote "its not likely that this story came from the Vedas" end quote........
And I never said the story came from the Vedas.
I was saying and meaning, the theme is borrowed straight from the Vedas.....or the idea is straight from the Vedas.
do you see that?
I say this because the Bible is mostly fabricated.
And becau ...[text shortened]... ver say much of whats in the Bible because it is in error.
God does not subscribe to error.
You're right vishu this debating IS easy...
24 Jan 11
Originally posted by utherpendragonThere where no cilties until after the flood date the is est. at 3000 bc.
Please be more clear on the point you are trying to make.
All I can gather from what you are saying is that you believe mankind started with Noah an estimated 5011 years ago? And/or there were no civilizations before that date?
24 Jan 11
5 edits
Originally posted by RBHILLRBHILL, What about Cain's city (Genesis 4:17) ?
There where no cilties until after the flood date the is est. at 3000 bc.
Hugh Ross believes the flood is back further. I think part of his reasoning is that Peleg (Gen. 10:25) was the man during whose time the land bridge connecting contenents was broken.
His name means "water course" if I recall rightly. And we are told that in his days the land was divided. This, Ross believes, is some thousands of years earlier when the land bridges which facilitated migration around the globe were broken. (See Gen. 10:25)
I'm undecided. But it would put Adam and Noah back in time further. Without subscribing to all Hugh Ross's ideas, he may have a valid point here. No ?
24 Jan 11
Originally posted by divegeesterWhen a honest gentleman receives higher truth, he will immediately be thankful and embrace that truth and make it his own.
The Bible is not fabricated, the Vedas are however; bogus and dishonest.
You're right vishu this debating IS easy...
But when a person who is insincere and dishonest is confronted with truth, they reject it and hold tighter on to there error.
24 Jan 11
1 edit
Originally posted by jaywillRead Numbers and Leviticus where Moses is suppose to be talking to God.
[b]============================
God would never talk of such mundane things as depicted talking to Moses.
=============================
What "mundane" things are you talking about ?[/b]
And the 600 laws you talk of from the OT, are from mens minds....not Gods
God would not speak such things.
25 Jan 11
Originally posted by vishvahetuvishvahetu, you are using the words "honest", "truth", "insincere", "error" and "higher" incorrectly. Continuing to do so, when this has been pointed out to you, undermines the effect of your posts.
When a honest gentleman receives higher truth, he will immediately be thankful and embrace that truth and make it his own.
But when a person who is insincere and dishonest is confronted with truth, they reject it and hold tighter on to there error.
25 Jan 11
Originally posted by FMFThe mysterious FMF......
vishvahetu, you are using the words "honest", "truth", "insincere", "error" and "higher" incorrectly. Continuing to do so, when this has been pointed out to you, undermines the effect of your posts.
I could imagine you are a professional man who has mastered the English language, but not common sense.
25 Jan 11
2 edits
Originally posted by vishvahetuSo do you think God says it is ok for a man to F another man?
Read Numbers and Leviticus where Moses is suppose to be talking to God.
And the 600 laws you talk of from the OT, are from mens minds....not Gods
God would not speak such things.
I am going to a lame college Basketball game tonight I will see you Tuesday morning California time.
25 Jan 11
Originally posted by vishvahetuYour religion is only about 1200 years behind Judaism, maybe someday you'll catch up, though I think not.
The story of the birth of baby Jesus has been plagiarized straight out of the Vedic teachings.
The Bible tells us falsely, that the little baby Jesus was born, and King Harrod killed all the male children because he didn't want the new baby to grow up and to challenge him.
This story was in the Vedic teachings hundreds of thousands of years ago, whe ...[text shortened]... en there right from the beginning long before the Bible was fabricated.
This is undeniable.
The first Old Testament books were written around 1450CE and the OT was Completed around 300CE. The vedic teachings were compiled from many different sources and different faith traditions and compiled around 200 CE, so culturally, historically and intellectually speaking, yours is the plagerist religion
I mentioned it before, and feel it necessary to repeat. It is a shame you know very little about your own religion....or any religion for that matter.
25 Jan 11
Originally posted by DowardYou have Goggled the Vedas and have come up with false information because you are trying to find some fault.
Your religion is only about 1200 years behind Judaism, maybe someday you'll catch up, though I think not.
The first Old Testament books were written around 1450CE and the OT was Completed around 300CE. The vedic teachings were compiled from many different sources and different faith traditions and compiled around 200 CE, so culturally, historically and int ...[text shortened]... It is a shame you know very little about your own religion....or any religion for that matter.
To speculate and put forward false information about the Vedas is more of your dishonesty.
The Vedas are pre history and are eternal because God and the living entities are eternal.
The Vedas present true spiritual knowledge without error.
They are the one and only original true teachings for mankind.