Originally posted by sonshipYou're not waiting till your nose is put out of joint. You've come straight out of the blocks as if your nose has already been put out of joint. A kind of pre-emptive pout? π
Let me guess. You won't discuss it with me, an exception to your "interesting" general rule, because I behave SO badly here and won't apologize for some offense you insist I have against you.
Originally posted by sonshipIf you don't care for genuine discussions and you don't like mixing with people with different beliefs and different senses of humour than you, and your vanity is set to continue to be as fragile as it always seems to be, I suggest you just go start a blog. π
Oh shut up !
Originally posted by FMFOh come on FMF. Over a decade here of talking to people with different beliefs, I have.
If you don't care for genuine discussions and you don't like mixing with people with different beliefs and different senses of humour than you, and your vanity is set to continue to be as fragile as it always seems to be, I suggest you just go start a blog. π
I just don't have a "Thou Shalt Argue with the Same People FOREVER" commandment that I think I have to live up to.
You really don't know if or if not I have a blog somewhere.
Originally posted by sonshipYeah, but something went amiss with you since about 2015 and 2016. I think you are here only to preach to the choir. I think what you do belongs on a blog or on a Christian web site. I think you should embrace dissent rather than bristle and sneer at it day after day. You weren't always like how you have become.
Oh come on FMF. Over a decade here of talking to people with different beliefs, I have.
Originally posted by dj2beckerPlease provide the evidence you spoke of for the Resurrection, which according to you, outweighs that of Reincarnation.
I will if you change your profile pic back to a lapdog and change your location back to "FMFs lap". π
Yes, the Resurrection was written about in the Gospels. Is that the sole basis of your 'evidence?' If so, does that mean anything written down (ever) is consequently to be considered evidence?
And you asked for information on possible evidence for reincarnation. Did you even bother to follow the link I provided in the OP, or were your words just hollow?
Originally posted by dj2beckerYou have reached a new low with this post. There is no evidence whatsoever that Divegeester has ever behaved dishonourably on this website, unlike yourself. You suggest otherwise simply because you have been exposed in your sock-puppetry, and it is reprehensible in the extreme.
If I was being different it would have been with the intention to deceive, that is the point. I was still the same person asking the same questions I always do having reverted back to an old account and no longer using the new one. And not pretending I was someone else like you probably do when you use your other accounts. π
Originally posted by FMFBristle, bristle!
Yeah, but something went amiss with you since about 2015 and 2016. I think you are here only to preach to the choir. I think what you do belongs on a blog or on a Christian web site. I think you should embrace dissent rather than bristle and sneer at it day after day. You weren't always like how you have become.
Sneer, sneer!
To the issue to which I commented on in response to twhitehead -
Matthew in particular speaks of other of the Old Testament saints he says rose from the dead and appeared in the city of Jerusalem after Jesus rose.
Not very much else is said about this.
What happened to them can only be speculated.
Originally posted by sonshipAn example to what FMF is saying is your pride limiting you from apologising to me when I pulled your quote up a couple of weeks ago.
Bristle, bristle!
Sneer, sneer!
To the issue to which I commented on in response to twhitehead -
[b]Matthew in particular speaks of other of the Old Testament saints he says rose from the dead and appeared in the city of Jerusalem after Jesus rose.
Not very much else is said about this.
What happened to them can only be speculated.[/b]
Originally posted by divegeesterNot really, I think you should go back and read my response.
An example to what FMF is saying is your pride limiting you from apologising to me when I pulled your quote up a couple of weeks ago.
You know a person can say -
" I am sorry that you were offended."
And a person can say - "I am sorry that I purposely offended you."
Any apology that you deem I owe you is probably along the line over these years as - "I am sorry that you were offended."
Sometimes people are offended when there has been no offense.
I don't owe you any apology for sometime vigorously disagreeing with you.
I am sorry that you were offended.