18 Sep 15
Prescient Trolling
Refers to an attempt to use elements from the future in order to confront, embarrass or discredit an opponent.
The Prescient Stalker will go forward in time to find every cragislist post you will ever make until he finds something embarrassing you will say, even if you post it thirty years in the future. After that, whenever you post anything the Prescient Stalker will link to the future post(s) in an effort to discredit you.
(Which apparently is what some gods can do ...)
😉
😛
18 Sep 15
Originally posted by wolfgang59I am willing to take full responsibility for all the things I will say here in the future.
[b]Prescient Trolling
Refers to an attempt to use elements from the future in order to confront, embarrass or discredit an opponent.
The Prescient Stalker will go forward in time to find every cragislist post you will ever make until he finds something embarrassing you will say, even if you post it thirty years in the future. After that, whenever ...[text shortened]... (s) in an effort to discredit you.
(Which apparently is what some gods can do ...)
😉
😛[/b]
18 Sep 15
Originally posted by wolfgang59I found this highly embarassing cragslist post you made in 2019:
[b]Prescient Trolling
Refers to an attempt to use elements from the future in order to confront, embarrass or discredit an opponent.
The Prescient Stalker will go forward in time to find every cragislist post you will ever make until he finds something embarrassing you will say, even if you post it thirty years in the future. After that, whenever ...[text shortened]... (s) in an effort to discredit you.
(Which apparently is what some gods can do ...)
😉
😛[/b]
http://houston.craigslist.org/w4w/647856943567.html
- Joined
- 16 Feb 08
- Moves
- 116939
18 Sep 15
Originally posted by wolfgang59This principle does not apply to Jehovah's Witneses who are permitted to retrospectively change whatever they might say in the future, as well as whatever predictions about the future they may have made in the past.
[b]Prescient Trolling
Refers to an attempt to use elements from the future in order to confront, embarrass or discredit an opponent.
The Prescient Stalker will go forward in time to find every cragislist post you will ever make until he finds something embarrassing you will say, even if you post it thirty years in the future. After that, whenever ...[text shortened]... (s) in an effort to discredit you.
(Which apparently is what some gods can do ...)
😉
😛[/b]
- Joined
- 16 Feb 08
- Moves
- 116939
20 Sep 15
2 edits
Originally posted by FMFThere is a post you are going to make in Grampy Bobby June 2019 thread entitled "Why Lists of things I like are Important".
Yes I am already taking responsibility for them. Feel free to confront me regarding anything I am going to say.
On page two of that thread you clearly object to a numeration strategy, preferring instead a "left indent with hyphen" approach, which you claim, does not limit the list to an (albeit subjective) length, nor indeed imply that there is any limit at all to list length generally, and specifically, of Grampy Bobby list or lists.
My question to you FMF, is why am I bothering to question you about it now, in the present when I could quite easily wait until the future and question you then?
20 Sep 15
Originally posted by divegeesterYour question is redundant because I am already apologizing now for all and any things I might say in the future that rub him or anyone else up the wrong way in the normal course of message boardiness.
There is a post you are going to make in Grampy Bobby June 2019 thread entitled [b]"Why Lists of things I like are Important".
On page two of that thread you clearly object to a numeration strategy, preferring instead a "left indent with hyphen" approach, which you claim, does not limit the list to an (albeit subjective) length, nor indeed imply t ...[text shortened]... ut it now, in the present when I could quite easily wait until the future and question you then?[/b]
- Joined
- 16 Feb 08
- Moves
- 116939
20 Sep 15
Originally posted by FMFI'm pretty sure your future apology will be ignored and confined to the past as soon as it is in the present.
Your question is redundant because I am already apologizing now for all and any things I might say in the future that rub him or anyone else up the wrong way in the normal course of message boardiness.