Originally posted by KellyJay
You really don't need anyone to talk to do you, you are quite adept
to putting words in other people's mouths and running along as if
you know what you believe and what others believe too.
Kelly

When you fail to say anything meaningful, don't complain if I do it for you.

Perhaps you are just trying to avoid the point?

Originally posted by AThousandYoung
According to the conservative Catholic perspective the world's population can be easily divided into logical groups, the individuals of which all possess/follow the group stereotypes.

Also according to Catholics, buggering small boys is lots of fun.

Ivanhoe, you need to get over that.

You missed a few things in my post. Last but not least the "😛" smiley .....

...... oh yeah, and in your short-fused, resentful and short sighted ways you forgot to mention the usual Ad Hominems about the Crusades, Galilei, Bruno, the Inquisition and the usual deliberations about the condom, the celibate and women priests .... but please, do continue your irrelevant rants .....

Originally posted by KellyJay
You think a fox size creature is an ancestor of whales due to some
thing about the shape of it's head. Really, think about that for a
moment! You don't think it could also just be another creture and
not have anything to do with either a fox, deer, or a whale just as
easily?
Kelly

I accept the theory of evolution for what it is, namely a scientific theory ...... therefore, I let scientists decide scientific matters.

I will initiate a thread on the matter whether in the United States evolutionism has "evolved" from a scientific theory into an overall and new ideology ..... or not ... and I will do so in the Debates Forum.

Originally posted by Red Night
science changes...it always does and always will.

Incorrect. Peoples' conclusions change. The basic process does not.

Originally posted by AThousandYoung
You misunderstand. There was supposed to be subtle sarcastic humor in that post. I guess I failed to include it.

Ivanhoe was stereotyping people in the quoted post. Therefore I stereotyped him. See?

Sorry I missed that. I guess I'm a bit too dense to appreciate subtle sarcasm. :'(