30 Dec 17
Originally posted by @dj2beckerWell we’ve discussed it once before in a thread that’s still live and I addressed all of your responses including your last one just before you left the thread.
We’ve discussed this several times before and you ignored my responses then so why are you asking again?
You don’t seem to be able to see the difference between a truthfull response and using it as silly rhetorical device Fetchmybecker.
30 Dec 17
divegeester: Have you decided whether or not you consider the Bible to be “evidence” of God’s existence?Are you claiming that you discussed it in a genuine and honest fashion on this Thread 175179?
Originally posted by @dj2becker
We’ve discussed this several times before and you ignored my responses then so why are you asking again?
Originally posted by @fmfAh thanks, yes that was the thread.
Are you claiming that you discussed it in a genuine and honest fashion on this Thread 175179?
30 Dec 17
Originally posted by @fmfYes blow hard, theist does not equal Christian. Crawl out of the bottle and smell the coffee.
Your claims about a god figure that has issued instructions and convoluted, magical promises about rewards and punishments strike me as nonsense. I think a non-believer taking this stance on a Spirituality debate and discussion forum is neither a "blow hard" nor "self-righteous". If I were saying to you that you should either agree with me or you else you are ...[text shortened]... ct beliefs, then that would perhaps be an example of being a a "blow hard" nor "self-righteous".
Originally posted by @eladarI didn't say it did. I don't claim that god does not exist. Theists/Christians like you claim that a god definitely does exist has revealed himself to you. There is no credible reason why I should believe you.
Yes blow hard, theist does not equal Christian.
Originally posted by @fmfSo you simply claim that you can't decide what to believe.
I didn't say it did. I don't claim that god does not exist. Theists/Christians like you claim that a god definitely does exist has revealed himself to you. There is no credible reason why I should believe you.
You could simply say that without having to bring other people into it. Why so you feel the need to try to put down others? Doing that makes you a self righteous blow hard.
When did I ever claim to try to concince you I am correct?
Originally posted by @eladarI don’t believe you have any information about a supernatural being. I believe that you have simply rote learned and internalised some specific religious dogma that I have no reason to believe.
So you simply claim that you can't decide what to believe.
You could simply say that without having to bring other people into it. Why so you feel the need to try to put down others? Doing that makes you a self righteous blow hard.
When did I ever claim to try to concince you I am correct?
Originally posted by @fmfFunny how I don't feel the need to comment on your beliefs, but tou have the need to comment on mine.
I don’t believe you have any information about a supernatural being. I believe that you have simply rote learned and internalised some specific religious dogma that I have no reason to believe.
Originally posted by @eladarThis is a debate and discussion message board. People commenting on the beliefs, claims and arguments expressed is par for the course.
Funny how I don't feel the need to comment on your beliefs, but tou have the need to comment on mine.
Originally posted by @fmfWhen have I said anything about your beliefs?
This is an odd thing for you, of all people here, to say.
I simply correct those who give faulty statements concerning the facts of the Bible. Outside of the Bible, what comment have I ever made?
Originally posted by @eladarWhat does this non-sequitur counter-question have to do with the post you were supposedly replying to?
When have I said anything about your beliefs?
I simply correct those who give faulty statements concerning the facts of the Bible. Outside of the Bible, what comment have I ever made?