In the beginning

In the beginning

Spirituality

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.

The Ghost Chamber

Joined
14 Mar 15
Moves
28760
14 Mar 19

@kellyjay said
The universe is not at a finite size or static, it is expanding. Even Einstein saw this when he looked through Hubble’s telescope, when he then acknowledged the error you are trying to justify.
Why have you crept in the word 'static' to accompany 'finite size'? Do you think the Quantum scientists concerned are advocating a static universe? Have you perhaps not understood what they said about quantum corrections?

Walk your Faith

USA

Joined
24 May 04
Moves
158033
14 Mar 19

@ghost-of-a-duke said
Why have you crept in the word 'static' to accompany 'finite size'? Do you think the Quantum scientists concerned are advocating a static universe? Have you perhaps not understood what they said about quantum corrections?
It is changing by expansion, moving through time and if we flipped time would it shrink? Static suggested it could stay the way it is, on its face no.

The Ghost Chamber

Joined
14 Mar 15
Moves
28760
14 Mar 19

@kellyjay said
It is changing by expansion, moving through time and if we flipped time would it shrink? Static suggested it could stay the way it is, on its face no.
Which is why 'your' introduction of the word 'static' was erroneous.

Yes, the universe is expanding.

Walk your Faith

USA

Joined
24 May 04
Moves
158033
14 Mar 19

@ghost-of-a-duke said
Which is why 'your' introduction of the word 'static' was erroneous.

Yes, the universe is expanding.
Covering all the bases nothing more.

The Ghost Chamber

Joined
14 Mar 15
Moves
28760
14 Mar 19

@kellyjay said
Covering all the bases nothing more.
Does covering all the bases lead to a home run? I'm not very good at baseball.

Secret RHP coder

on the payroll

Joined
26 Nov 04
Moves
155080
15 Mar 19

@ghost-of-a-duke said
Does covering all the bases lead to a home run? I'm not very good at baseball.
Hitting the ball over the fence (in "fair" territory) leads to a home run.

However, for it to count, the batter must step on all 4 bases.

Walk your Faith

USA

Joined
24 May 04
Moves
158033
15 Mar 19

@bigdoggproblem said
Hitting the ball over the fence (in "fair" territory) leads to a home run.

However, for it to count, the batter must step on all 4 bases.
In the proper order. 🙂

Misfit Queen

Isle of Misfit Toys

Joined
08 Aug 03
Moves
36741
15 Mar 19

@ghost-of-a-duke said
Does covering all the bases lead to a home run? I'm not very good at baseball.
No, "covering all the bases" leads to quicker "outs", since the bases are guarded by a player, and thus just needs the ball thrown to him to cause an out (usually only when the bases are "loaded" ).

Misfit Queen

Isle of Misfit Toys

Joined
08 Aug 03
Moves
36741
15 Mar 19

@kellyjay said
Actually people say things not science. What do you think science says about this?
I'll leave it as an exercise to expand your knowledge, then.

Walk your Faith

USA

Joined
24 May 04
Moves
158033
15 Mar 19

@suzianne said
I'll leave it as an exercise to expand your knowledge, then.
You brought up "what science says" so tell me, what you do you hear, know, believe that goes to the topic.

Walk your Faith

USA

Joined
24 May 04
Moves
158033
15 Mar 19

@ghost-of-a-duke said
A finite mind can never comprehend the infinite. You know that Kelly. All we can do is apply logic.

I have done that.
Like all things we can only comprehend some, and what I still don't see you saying is how a universe could eternally expand, have sunlight eternally, have all the things we see today and be all the things we see today? If it took an eternity of time to even reach this point? Why would this point even be here if there was endless time before now?

The Ghost Chamber

Joined
14 Mar 15
Moves
28760
15 Mar 19

@bigdoggproblem said
Hitting the ball over the fence (in "fair" territory) leads to a home run.

However, for it to count, the batter must step on all 4 bases.
Thanks Joe.

R
Standard memberRemoved

Joined
03 Jan 13
Moves
13080
15 Mar 19
2 edits

@Ghost-of-a-Duke

My post: 'I propose that the universe has always existed, in one form or another.'

Your reply: 'The universe has always existed in SOME form, you say. Okay, I got that.'



I didn't 'say that'. You didn't 'get it'.


Okay. that is annoying.

The universes has always existed in one form or another.

Do I get it now ?

'I propose that the universe has always existed, in one form or another.'


Close I think.

You propose that the universe has always existed, in one form or another.

Whew! Where do you get such faith ? Everything about the Second Law of Thermodynamics says the universe is running DOWN into colder, motionless, falling apart, accumulated entropy, expanding into the void.

But you think it has been doing this and somehow bouncing back or tunneling through to some other dimension and virtually (now) "re-creating" it self in another form ? ... "one form or another" ?

This is easier or more logical then "In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth" (Gen. 1:1) ?

Given the accepted tremendous finely calibrated constants so that this entirely unique thing called life on earth could be permitted to exist, I think it requires less of a leap of faith to believe God transcending the whole creation, deliberately created it.

The Ghost Chamber

Joined
14 Mar 15
Moves
28760
15 Mar 19

@sonship

As above:

'The universe may have existed forever, according to a new model that applies quantum correction terms to complement Einstein's theory of general relativity. The model may also account for dark matter and dark energy, resolving multiple problems at once... In cosmological terms, the scientists explain that the quantum corrections can be thought of as a cosmological constant term (without the need for dark energy) and a radiation term. These terms keep the universe at a finite size, and therefore give it an infinite age. The terms also make predictions that agree closely with current observations of the cosmological constant and density of the universe...'


Read more at: https://phys.org/news/2015-02-big-quantum-equation-universe.html

Secret RHP coder

on the payroll

Joined
26 Nov 04
Moves
155080
15 Mar 19

@ghost-of-a-duke said
Thanks Joe.
No problem, Vern.