Spirituality
05 Jul 12
06 Jul 12
Originally posted by RJHinds"Goodbye, all you [maties]
I have enjoyed making so many friends here and I hate to leave.
However, I have done enough damage and apologize for all the misunderstandings.
Good luck and may God bless all of you.
HalleluYah !!! Praise the Lord! Holy! Holy! Holy!
There's nothing you can say
To make me change my mind.
Goodbye."
06 Jul 12
Originally posted by stellspalfieepic FAIL, thats not Gods fault is it, its the result of complications, your assertion that its as a consequence of Gods violation is ludicrous and unworthy of serious comment.
look at all the women who dont make it full term and for no apparent reason they loose their baby. gods got his hand in there somewhere, either he has taken the baby or stood by and done nothing to stop it happening.
he can not be angry about abortions and have his people make a big fuss about it and at the same time do nothing to help babies who are trying to be born.
so what is it, is he taking the babies or is he doing nothing to help?
06 Jul 12
Originally posted by Proper KnobIndeed, you would be as well as playing Bingo as argue with people whose sole
Bingo!!
For a God who can supposedly save the world when he turns up ending all death and suffering he's been remarkably vacant for the last 2000 years. Where was he during the holocaust? Where was he during the Black Death? Where was he during the Rwandan genocide? Where was he during the countless rapes and sexual assaults during the last two millen ...[text shortened]... assaulted and did nothing, i somehow doubt he would call my actions 'an act of patience'.
argument is substantiated by ludicrous self opinions, trundle trundle, neeeeext!
- Joined
- 16 Jan 07
- Moves
- 95105
06 Jul 12
Originally posted by robbie carrobieso your answer is that he is standing by doing nothing. he places so much importance in the life of an unborn baby that it angers him if a woman takes a morning after pill and kills a few cells, yet he doesnt deem a baby that dies in the womb at 8 months worthy of his intervention, even though he is the idiot that designed the crazy system in which babies are born into the world.
epic FAIL, thats not Gods fault is it, its the result of complications, your assertion that its as a consequence of Gods violation is ludicrous and unworthy of serious comment.
if you dont understand the hypocritical, immoral nature of this that then you are so far down the rabbit hole you have lost sight of true morals and seem willing to defend the undefendable.
06 Jul 12
Originally posted by robbie carrobieThe world is full of suffering and God is yet to show up, that's more than a self opinion, it's a fact.
Indeed, you would be as well as playing Bingo as argue with people whose sole
argument is substantiated by ludicrous self opinions, trundle trundle, neeeeext!
06 Jul 12
Originally posted by Proper Knob
The world is full of suffering and God is yet to show up, that's more than a self opinion, it's a fact.
The world is full of suffering and God is yet to show up, that's more than a self opinion, it's a fact.
No, this is not a fact. This shows that you only expect God to work from the outside. You do not understand God working from the inside out.
06 Jul 12
Originally posted by stellspalfieThis world is not a final exam for God.
so your answer is that he is standing by doing nothing. he places so much importance in the life of an unborn baby that it angers him if a woman takes a morning after pill and kills a few cells, yet he doesnt deem a baby that dies in the womb at 8 months worthy of his intervention, even though he is the idiot that designed the crazy system in which babi ...[text shortened]... the rabbit hole you have lost sight of true morals and seem willing to defend the undefendable.
Humans, yes, not God.
It's all about how the humans deal with situations like this.
Some pass, some fail. Some fail miserably.
- Joined
- 16 Jan 07
- Moves
- 95105
06 Jul 12
Originally posted by Suziannewhy is it all about how humans deal situations? a test? is our existence nothing more than a quiz show, see if we jump through gods hoops and win a holiday in eternity if we get is right. oh and just to make things harder, lots of the contestants will not even know the rules because god will not spread his word to them during their life time. oh and also due to the ever changing meaning given to his rule book we never know if we are doing what he wants anyway.
This world is not a final exam for God.
Humans, yes, not God.
It's all about how the humans deal with situations like this.
Some pass, some fail. Some fail miserably.
how do you make god happy, if he makes it unclear what he wants, just do your best and hope thats enough. or if you live in tribe in the brazilian rain forest live your life oblivious, die, then get told you cant get into heaven because you had homosexual sex, poor old tribesman never had a chance.
and the poor unborn babies, what do they get out of gods little game show. do they get judged? or a free pass? if their parents dont make it into heaven does that mean they will never meet them?
do you know exactly what you need to do to make god happy?
is it fair that billions of people have lived and died without even knowing about god?
07 Jul 12
1 edit
Originally posted by stellspalfieJust on the question of kids spirituality, I think that it is mostly upto the parents whether the kids get there early childhood questions adequately answered or if the parents either 1) leave them in the dark. OR 2). Indoctrinate them with their own beliefs.
why is it all about how humans deal situations? a test? is our existence nothing more than a quiz show, see if we jump through gods hoops and win a holiday in eternity if we get is right. oh and just to make things harder, lots of the contestants will not even know the rules because god will not spread his word to them during their life time. oh and als ...[text shortened]... happy?
is it fair that billions of people have lived and died without even knowing about god?
Only parents that let kids find their own spirituality (dharma) are doing the right thing . IMO/
07 Jul 12
I just wanted to point out to anyone who missed it (I forget the thread title of the top of my head) but RJ was told by me that "maties" was a put down and as far as I know he didn't dispute that.
I said that it was a harsh put down, often referring to a "small package" , amongst other things.
Do you think he had this in mind when posting his thread title?
07 Jul 12
Originally posted by karoly aczelthat was my impression first time i saw it. didn't think it was worth a mention though, after all, this is rj we are talking about. is there anyone here who didn't think he is a douche?
I just wanted to point out to anyone who missed it (I forget the thread title of the top of my head) but RJ was told by me that "maties" was a put down and as far as I know he didn't dispute that.
I said that it was a harsh put down, often referring to a "small package" , amongst other things.
Do you think he had this in mind when posting his thread title?