Spirituality
04 Jul 15
07 Jul 15
Originally posted by googlefudgeBecause some photos are fake does not mean all of them are fake. There has been a lot of evolution stuff faked and you don't seem to be concerned about that. π
Turns out creationists have discovered Photoshop...
Or at least other people using photoshop...
http://www.worth1000.com/contests/8196/archaeological-anomalies-7
How pathetic do you have to be to create a video showing 'evidence' for your beliefs that you
plucked from a image editing contest site?
07 Jul 15
Originally posted by avalanchethecatThat was only a straw man argument and he knows it or at least should know it. π
Oh don't go and tell them that, they'll start doubting stuff they find on the web and before you know it they'll start thinking for themselves. Then where will we be? And it'll be your fault.
Originally posted by sonhouseBut perhaps there were "giants in the land" just like the Holy Bible says. And perhaps, some of these giants were a result of the demonic angels messing with the daughters of men and these giants were the mighty men called the sons of the gods by the pagan religions, and perhaps they also messed with the DNA of animals and women to produce the half animal and man creature of the pagan myths. And perhaps that is why God had to save a few DNA perfect humans and animals and destroy all the others with a worldwide flood.
Just what is your point about large humans? We already know there were ten foot tall apes a few million years ago, so what?
Originally posted by RJHindsAnd perhaps, perhaps, perhaps you are filled with wishful thinking.
But perhaps there were "giants in the land" just like the Holy Bible says. And perhaps, some of these giants were a result of the demonic angels messing with the daughters of men and these giants were the mighty men called the sons of the gods by the pagan religions, and perhaps they also messed with the DNA of animals and women to produce the half animal a ...[text shortened]... to save a few DNA perfect humans and animals and destroy all the others with a worldwide flood.
Originally posted by RJHindsOnly if you interpret the word in a sense so loose as to render it's meaning irreparably compromised. The 'evidence' supporting this fatuous belief is credible only to a vanishingly small proportion of the world's educated population, which proportion is easily dismissed as almost certainly bats**t insane.
I believe you are referring to the evidence based on many assumptions from the evolutionists worldview. There is also a large amount of evidence for a young earth from the creationists worldview. I guess that makes it a wash. π
Originally posted by avalanchethecatHee hee hee π
Only if you interpret the word in a sense so loose as to render it's meaning irreparably compromised. The 'evidence' supporting this fatuous belief is credible only to a vanishingly small proportion of the world's educated population, which proportion is easily dismissed as almost certainly bats**t insane.