Originally posted by robbie carrobie
He sounds as though he knows what he is talking about to me. Then again perhaps you are more an expert in his field than he is.

Originally posted by twhitehead
If he had anything scientific and not religious, he would be in for a Nobel prize. Instead of submitting a scientific paper on the matter, he chose to talk to Awake. Basically, he's got nothing.

robbie can't even get to the end of page one of his own thread without going furtive! 😀

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
He sounds as though he knows what he is talking about to me.

Originally posted by twhitehead
Evolution quite clearly is not his field. And yet, I am clearly more expert in the field of evolution than he is.

Originally posted by twhitehead
Yes, its easy to bamboozle someone with no scientific knowledge whatsoever, especially when he is on record as not wanting to learn any more.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
I don't think he claims to have anything making your assertion logically fallacious.

For me, such design simply could not have evolved.

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
really? How do you know what he has studied so that you can make the claim that you know more about it than he does?

Originally posted by twhitehead
He claimed:

For me, such design simply could not have evolved.

Now either he is claiming to have something, or he just pulled that out of where the sun don't shine.

I think we both agree that he doesn't have anything that would stand up to scientific scrutiny - hence his choice to try and peddle it to uneducated folk like you.

Originally posted by twhitehead
From the statement you quoted him making - it is obvious.

Originally posted by twhitehead
From the statement you quoted him making - it is obvious.

As suspected twithead has arrogantly made claims that he cannot substantiate, fabricated untruths and has shown himself to be a thoroughly disreputable character in the process. No surprises there.

Originally posted by FMF
Talking of the JW org and blood, the Watchtower once quoted Brazilian surgeon Dr Américo Valério as saying transfusions were often followed by -- "moral insanity, sexual perversions, repression, inferiority complexes, petty crimes" and Dr Alonzo Jay Shadman claiming that a person's blood "contains all the peculiarities of the individual ... [including] hereditar ...[text shortened]... ce the impulse to commit suicide, murder, or steal are in the blood."

Do you agree with this?

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
I provide the following for the edification of our atheist friends.

For more than a decade, Frédéric Dumoulin has worked in the field of pharmaceutical research at Ghent University in Belgium. At one time he was an atheist. But later Frédéric became convinced that God created life. Awake! asked Frédéric—who is now one of Jehovah’s Witnesses—about ...[text shortened]... chemical, and electrical barriers. For me, such design simply could not have evolved.

jw.org

Originally posted by robbie carrobie
Its a subjective reality, why you should have a problem with it I cannot say.