07 Dec '21 22:57>
Like all effective lies, this false gospel mixes falsehoods with a kernel of truth and its proponent cherry picks and misinterprets verses and passages from the Holy Bible to support it.
But it’s a straight-up perversion of the Gospel of Jesus Christ.
Here are the essentials of this false gospel:
• Jesus Christ died for the sins of the whole world. (This is accurate.)
• Jesus Christ died for everyone’s *past sins.* (This is false.)
• Keeping the commandments and doing good works are the only criteria for gaining eternal life in the Kingdom of God. (This is false.)
• Jesus Christ will judge whose good works and commandment keeping are good enough to gain eternal life in the Kingdom of God. (This is false.)
• Belief in Jesus Christ is not necessary to enter the Kingdom of God - atheists, Muslims, Hindus who did enough good works and kept the commandments well enough also will enter the Kingdom of God. (This is false.)
Here’s the central problem with this false gospel.
If Jesus Christ died for everyone’s *past* sins, what does past refer to? What timeframe? When Jesus Christ died, the sins of everyone living today were in the future.
Now the proponent of this false gospel used to say belief in Jesus Christ was necessary for eternal life, and that past sins referred to sins people committed *before accepting and believing in Jesus Christ.*
But then the proponent of this false gospel said atheists who did good works could get eternal life so belief in Jesus Christ (in his view) was no longer necessary.
So if Jesus Christ died for the past sins of an atheist, what is the reference point that determines the past?
This isn’t the only problem with this false gospel, but it’s a big one.
I’ll wait (perhaps in vain) for the proponent of this false gospel to explain what timeframe “past sins” refers to before I start to list other problems with it.
But it’s a straight-up perversion of the Gospel of Jesus Christ.
Here are the essentials of this false gospel:
• Jesus Christ died for the sins of the whole world. (This is accurate.)
• Jesus Christ died for everyone’s *past sins.* (This is false.)
• Keeping the commandments and doing good works are the only criteria for gaining eternal life in the Kingdom of God. (This is false.)
• Jesus Christ will judge whose good works and commandment keeping are good enough to gain eternal life in the Kingdom of God. (This is false.)
• Belief in Jesus Christ is not necessary to enter the Kingdom of God - atheists, Muslims, Hindus who did enough good works and kept the commandments well enough also will enter the Kingdom of God. (This is false.)
Here’s the central problem with this false gospel.
If Jesus Christ died for everyone’s *past* sins, what does past refer to? What timeframe? When Jesus Christ died, the sins of everyone living today were in the future.
Now the proponent of this false gospel used to say belief in Jesus Christ was necessary for eternal life, and that past sins referred to sins people committed *before accepting and believing in Jesus Christ.*
But then the proponent of this false gospel said atheists who did good works could get eternal life so belief in Jesus Christ (in his view) was no longer necessary.
So if Jesus Christ died for the past sins of an atheist, what is the reference point that determines the past?
This isn’t the only problem with this false gospel, but it’s a big one.
I’ll wait (perhaps in vain) for the proponent of this false gospel to explain what timeframe “past sins” refers to before I start to list other problems with it.