Originally posted by sonship
Who mentioned "Tri speak" ?

btw
I lack a belief in Jym.

I thought Tri speak was more catchy for your new phrase "Triple Speak",
please tell us all what it means - if it catches on it will get into the dictionaries.

I'll send you a pic of Jym. I can assure you he is real.

Originally posted by KellyJay
Pick one I'm not interested in limiting your choices or views.

What'll be interesting will be whether you will place limits on your own ability to discuss the choices and views that people present.

Originally posted by KellyJay
Thoughts

No.

Originally posted by KellyJay
Thoughts

This world, in this time (ie. being born past 1970), should be evolved enough to take care of everyone with the basics of survival and a decent culture that will lead them to hope and prosperity given the conditions we have today.

(this is a modified ,short answer.)

Originally posted by googlefudge
Then no, the lump of rock I am standing on doesn't owe me anything, the question is stupid.

If your question is that open to interpretation it boarders on meaningless.

I disagree. I believe the "Earth" to be a conscious entity, in accordance with aspects of the gaia theory

Originally posted by Ghost of a Duke
lol That's true!

no its not. we kill our own more aT THE MOMENT.

if the earth wanted to go loco on us it could send plenty of life destroying tornadoes into my part of the world. Bushfires. earthquakes at sea causing huge tidal waves to deplete australias population, 85% of which resides on the east coast.

When I look at it from my perspective it seems that "god" is actually protecting people. (not that i believe in that sort of god 🙂 )

Originally posted by karoly aczel
When I look at it from my perspective it seems that "god" is actually protecting people. (not that i believe in that sort of god 🙂 )

Any God worth being called 'God' would be able to stop all natural disasters that harm people. I don't know about Gaia and its capabilities but how would you judge? How would you know what the number of bushfire and storms would be given an entirely natural world as compared to one with Gaia?

Originally posted by KellyJay
Pick one I'm not interested in limiting your choices or views.

But the word "world" can mean many things to different people. can you at least explain why you are asking the question so that respondents have a frame of reference.

Originally posted by karoly aczel
I disagree. I believe the "Earth" to be a conscious entity, in accordance with aspects of the gaia theory

First, the 'Gaia theory' does not posit that the Earth is concious.

Second, if it did, it would be wrong to do so.
The Earth is a giant ball of rock and iron, with a tiny thin film of interestingly arranged
carbon, water, and nitrogen on the surface.

Originally posted by googlefudge
First, the 'Gaia theory' does not posit that the Earth is concious.

In addition, in a scientific context, it would be termed 'Gaia hypothesis'. But I believe Karoly has it as his religion in which case he would do well to call it Gaia religion.

Originally posted by twhitehead
Never heard of him. Is it relevant?

No.

Originally posted by wolfgang59
I thought Tri speak was more catchy for your new phrase "Triple Speak",
please tell us all what it means - if it catches on it will get into the dictionaries.

I'll send you a pic of Jym. I can assure you he is real.

I'll send you a pic of Jym. I can assure you he is real.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Oh, I don't know about that. You can fake a lot of things with Photoshop these days. And maybe you just were TOLD that is Jym. Did you ever get a blood sample and have it taken to a lab for DNA analysis to compare with the birth records of such a Jym?

And then there too they might have been originally mistaken, or lied, or been inept.

Beside, this impersonator probably just wants to get into your wallot.

I lack a belief in Jym.

Originally posted by googlefudge
Then no, the lump of rock I am standing on doesn't owe me anything, the question is stupid.

If your question is that open to interpretation it boarders on meaningless.

And yet people still found reasons to argue.

Originally posted by KellyJay
And yet people still found reasons to argue.

Yes, mostly about different meanings of 'world'.

Originally posted by wolfgang59
My wife and I just had Jim as a guest in our home. If you do not know him he is my father-in-law.

Its life Jim but not as we know it.