Originally posted by sonhouse
What is your definition of 'naturalism'?
Are you saying they find meaning in evolution outside of religious dogma? I think the religious set demands atheism to not have meaning in life, something I find abhorrent, disingenuous and arrogant to boot. And I don't even claim to be atheist.
“...What is your definition of 'naturalism'? ...”
rightly or wrongly, I have taken its meaning to be the belief that we can only rationally assume natural causes (as opposed to supernatural causes) as explanations to all observed phenomena in the world.
“...Are you saying they find meaning in evolution outside of religious dogma? ...”
that is one of the things I, rightly or wrongly, assumed the link implied can happen.
“...I think the religious set demands atheism to not have meaning in life, something I find abhorrent, disingenuous and arrogant to boot. ...”
I am with total agreement with you here for I feel the same. But, personally, I can only see meaning in my life by discovering what it is I want and also by doing something that I find meaningful. But I cannot see how I can find meaning in my life by considering either evolution or naturalism (as I understand it) hence my surprise on what I think that link implies -unless the link implies no such thing? Perhaps I have just misunderstood the link.