19 Mar 14
Originally posted by yoctobyteSonhouse posted this recent discovery and it does absolutely confirm the Genesis account.
Interesting information coming out of Israel.
http://www.timesofisrael.com/with-new-big-bang-evidence-creation-is-a-fact/
... except for the talking snake and afew other bits and pieces ...
19 Mar 14
Originally posted by yoctobyteI do not believe that the universe could have came about by an explosion. An explosion would bring disorder instead of the order that is demonstrated by our solar system.
Interesting information coming out of Israel.
http://www.timesofisrael.com/with-new-big-bang-evidence-creation-is-a-fact/
19 Mar 14
1 edit
Originally posted by wolfgang59My mistake if double posted but not so sure if it is the same article. This article is dated today.
Sonhouse posted this recent discovery and it does absolutely confirm the Genesis account.
... except for the talking snake and afew other bits and pieces ...
Did you read the article?
19 Mar 14
Originally posted by RJHindsWhat would a disorderly solar system look like? Just out of curiosity.
I do not believe that the universe could have came about by an explosion. An explosion would bring disorder instead of the order that is demonstrated by our solar system.
19 Mar 14
Originally posted by RJHindsThis is a mis-conception prompted by the awful term 'big bang'. There was no 'bang' and there was no explosion.
I do not believe that the universe could have came about by an explosion. An explosion would bring disorder instead of the order that is demonstrated by our solar system.
Csll it a 'rapid expansion' if you like.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/science/space/universe/questions_and_ideas/big_bang/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Bang
--- Penguin.
20 Mar 14
Originally posted by yoctobyteNot a double post. Your article is citing the discovery which Sonhouse alerted us to the other day.
My mistake if double posted but not so sure if it is the same article. This article is dated today.
Did you read the article?
I read both.
I cannot see how that guy thinks it gives credence to Genesis.
20 Mar 14
Originally posted by yoctobyteIf a paper written in the holy land by one person from god chosen people, it must be correct, right? And equally correct of the same reason that Jesus isn't divine, right? And we can rip out the genesis chapters from the bible, right? Yes, right.
Interesting information coming out of Israel.
http://www.timesofisrael.com/with-new-big-bang-evidence-creation-is-a-fact/
20 Mar 14
Originally posted by FabianFnasDude, it is an article by secular scientist that i thought was interesting. Please stick to the OP., this is not about Jesus' divinity.
If a paper written in the holy land by one person from god chosen people, it must be correct, right? And equally correct of the same reason that Jesus isn't divine, right? And we can rip out the genesis chapters from the bible, right? Yes, right.
20 Mar 14
Originally posted by yoctobyteThis is on-topic. The motivation will be off-topic. Do you want me to explain despite this fact? This is spiritual forum and not science forum you know.
Dude, it is an article by secular scientist that i thought was interesting. Please stick to the OP., this is not about Jesus' divinity.
20 Mar 14
Originally posted by PudgenikAll I said was we gave god human attributes and I don't think a real god would be burdened with such baggage. Those verses about 'I am a jealous god' or the other translation that suggests this god demands attention or some such.
RJ you remind me of sonhouse, he also has his opinions on what God should be like. Do we really know all about God and what he chooses?
Just too convenient to have your god just so coincidentally have such features.
Like a god who can create entire universes would be worried about non worshiping humans?
How stupid do you think people have to be to fall for such crap?
Oops, I forgot, 3 billion already have.