Originally posted by KellyJay
I read what the doctor said; I went to his site and read it. I disagree with him, I
believe that the way it is laid out is the way it occurred. With respect to how I view
you, I don't care if you think my views are based upon something vague over time.
I gave you may reasons, like them or not up to you, as far as I'm concern that is
all that is required ...[text shortened]... I could see him injecting his views, that;
however, was not what he did in my opinion.
Kelly
I'm going to table the discussion about John 3 to focus on the accusation that you made.
You made the following accusation
"I've also no doubt that you doubt or reject scripture least you be held accountable to it as written."
Now you're insisting on hiding behind an extremely vague explanation after you've been asked to justify it. All I've been asking you to do is come out into the light of truth instead of hiding in the darkness. Are YOU willing to be "held accountable to it as written"? Or do you "hateth the light"?
Evidently you either don't understand the following verses that you quoted earlier or aren't willing to live them:
John 3
19 And this is the judgment, that the light is come into the world, and men loved the darkness rather than the light; for their works were evil.
20
For every one that doeth evil hateth the light, and cometh not to the light, lest his works should be reproved.21 But he that doeth the truth cometh to the light, that his works may be made manifest, that they have been wrought in God.
In case you still don't understand it, I'll give you the following scenario:
Let's say someone makes the following accusation:
"I've no doubt that the KellyJay is a pedophile"
You of course ask them to justify the accusation. You get the following response:
"I base my assertion on [what] would
be a more than a few conversations and posts of yours I've read."
You of course ask for specifics. You get the following response:
"With respect to how I view
you, I don't care if you think my views are based upon something vague over time. I gave you may reasons, like them or not up to you, as far as I'm concern that is all that is required.
Do you still honestly think that "that is all that is required"?
I'm demanding that you come out into the light of truth with it. Or do you "hateth the light"?