Can Science see God or acknowledge the possibility of God?

@fmf said
Why do you feel the need to commandeer science to bolster what you want to believe?

Why do you feel need to ask that question?
What do you care what I or anyone else does?
You the self appointed guardian of science?
You the self appointed guardian of how everyone else lives?
You the self appointed hall monitor of RHP boards?

@kellyjay said
Why do you feel need to ask that question?
What do you care what I or anyone else does?
You the self appointed guardian of science?
You the self appointed guardian of how everyone else lives?
You the self appointed hall monitor of RHP boards?

This is a public debate and discussion forum, KellyJay and here you are wriggling and deflecting in a bizarre fashion in the face of a really very straightforward and obvious question about your beliefs.

@fmf said
This is a public debate and discussion forum, KellyJay and here you are wriggling and deflecting in a bizarre fashion in the face of a really very straightforward and obvious question about your beliefs.

Well there is your answer it’s a debate board, people use what they can to make their points. I am no different!

@kellyjay said
Well there is your answer it’s a debate board, people use what they can to make their points. I am no different!

So what's this two-thread-at-the-same-time fixation of yours ~ that science does not support your superstitions ~ really all about? As cassaid4 said on the other thread, what you appear to be exhibiting is insecurity about your faith.

@fmf said
So what's this two-thread-at-the-same-time fixation of yours ~ that science does not support your superstitions ~ really all about? As cassaid4 said on the other thread, what you appear to be exhibiting is insecurity about your faith.

You don’t support the existence of God and you don’t speak for science unless you’re been appointed to some prestigious position world wide. Granted I don’t watch the news much anymore so I could have missed it if you were.

@kellyjay said
You don’t support the existence of God and you don’t speak for science unless you’re been appointed to some prestigious position world wide. Granted I don’t watch the news much anymore so I could have missed it if you were.

Being fatuous is just deflecting. I seem to have prodded you in a profoundly insecure part of your psyche. Why does it matter if scientific endeavour doesn't corroborate your religious beliefs,

@kellyjay said
Why do you feel need to ask that question?
What do you care what I or anyone else does?
You the self appointed guardian of science?
You the self appointed guardian of how everyone else lives?
You the self appointed hall monitor of RHP boards?

You were asked ONE question and your response
instead of an answer
is FIVE questions!

This is typical of you. Why are you always so evasive?
A simple "I do not know" would be preferable and more honest.

@fmf said
Being fatuous is just deflecting. I seem to have prodded you in a profoundly insecure part of your psyche. Why does it matter if scientific endeavour doesn't corroborate your religious beliefs,

How would you know, the only thing I've seen you do here is motivation
mongering you don't touch the topic you only go after the poster. If you want to
speak about the topic instead of the people who you disagree with you should
grow a couple and deal with the topics instead. I again don't give a rats butt what
you think about with respect to why I think the things I do. If you can stick to the
topic we can talk if all you want to do is motivation mongering I have nothing
more to say to you.

@wolfgang59 said
You were asked ONE question and your response
instead of an answer
is FIVE questions!

This is typical of you. Why are you always so evasive?
A simple "I do not know" would be preferable and more honest.

My motivation isn't a topic here, if you want to discuss the issues at hand we can.
If you want to start up a OP discussing my motivation do so, I'm sure you and a
few others who spend a great deal of time worrying about that, can sit around and
play with each other insulting people whose beliefs you disagree with.

@kellyjay said
How would you know, the only thing I've seen you do here is motivation
mongering you don't touch the topic you only go after the poster.

The topic, as I see it, is "science" v "religious faith".

@kellyjay said
If you want to
speak about the topic instead of the people who you disagree with you should
grow a couple and deal with the topics instead.

Why are you worried about whether or not "science" corroborates your "religious faith"?

@kellyjay said
I again don't give a rats butt what
you think about with respect to why I think the things I do. If you can stick to the
topic we can talk if all you want to do is motivation mongering I have nothing
more to say to you.

I am talking to you about your spiritual beliefs. I am on-topic. I am addressing what you are saying. I am here talking about "science" and "faith". I have answered questions about my belief. It's a debate and discussion forum. I am asking you about what you have said here in public.

@fmf said
The topic, as I see it, is "science" v "religious faith".

Start your own thread.

@kellyjay said
Start your own thread.

It's what this thread is about.

@fmf said
It's what this thread is about.

This thread is about what the name says. On this topic I'll gladly engage with you.
You think science shouldn't be used to seek truth that if the end result is something
out side of the material world? If so is it only because you believe all truth is found
in the material world and therefore science is blind to all else?