Originally posted by sonhouse
Did you get the part where he called the pillar of salt lady the 'pillow' of salt? That was a big clue.

No, I didn't. As soon as I read the name Edward Current I went somewhere else.

Originally posted by sonship
No, I didn't. As soon as I read the name Edward Current I went somewhere else.

Do you think RHinds is posting this as a parody as part of a fake christian identity, or do you think he really believes Edward Current to be "refuting atheism"?

Originally posted by divegeester
Do you think RHinds is posting this as a parody as part of a fake christian identity, or do you think he really believes Edward Current to be "refuting atheism"?

Well, duh, didn't he? I could not have done it funnier. Duh! And I am a redneck. 😏

Originally posted by RJHinds
Well, duh, didn't he? I could not have done it funnier. Duh! And I am a redneck. 😏

Ah, so you realised Edward Current was parodying Christianity's view of atheism before you made the OPs?

Originally posted by divegeester
Do you think RHinds is posting this as a parody as part of a fake christian identity, or do you think he really believes Edward Current to be "refuting atheism"?

I don't know. Sorry.
I am not sure I can figure out what RJHinds is trying to do there.

Originally posted by divegeester
Ah, so you realised Edward Current was parodying Christianity's view of atheism before you made the OPs?

He reveals the atheistic thoughts in his parody, thus making a fool of himself, duh. This man demonstrated the proof of the truth of Holy scipture that is written - the fool has said in his heart there is no God. Duh!

http://www.evidencetobelieve.net/triune_god_in_the_scriptures.htm

HalleluYah !!! Praise the Lord! Glory be to God! Holy! Holy! Holy!

Originally posted by RJHinds
He reveals the atheistic thoughts in his parody, thus making a fool of himself, duh. This man demonstrated the proof of the truth of Holy scipture that is written - the fool has said in his heart there is no God.

Did you realised Edward Current was parodying Christianity's view of atheism before you made the OP?

Originally posted by divegeester
Did you realised Edward Current was parodying Christianity's view of atheism before you made the OP?

Bump for Hinds

Originally posted by divegeester
Bump for Hinds

I plead the 5th amendment. 😏

HalleluYah !!! Praise the Lord! Holy! Holy! Holy!

Originally posted by Penguin
Do you reckon RJ has actually seen that first video? Or is this an example of Poe's Law (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poe%27s_law) in action?

Or is the 'RJ' character the parody, as has been suggested several times? I am finding harder and harder to believe that RJ can really be that mind-numbingly stupid.

RJ, own up. Do you really honestly think that first link is an attempt to refute atheism?

--- Penguin

Thanks for introducing me to Poe's law. The truth of the matter is undeniable, it's good to see itso well defined

Originally posted by RJHinds
I plead the 5th amendment.

It's quite endearing to think you didn't realise.

Bless your little idiotic heart.

Originally posted by divegeester
It's quite endearing to think you didn't realise.

Bless your little idiotic heart.

It really doesn't make any difference, now, does it? 😏

Originally posted by RJHinds
It really doesn't make any difference, now, does it? 😏

Only in that it completely negates any validity or credibility your OP might have had if it wasn't you who wrote it.

Originally posted by FMF
"Blasphemy" is a kind of thoughtcrime and the suggestion that it applies to non-believers requires doublethink but, in my experience, pointing this out often provokes duckspeak.

And this from a man who knows duckspeak when he uses... I mean hears it, yeah, that's what I meant.

Originally posted by johnnylongwoody
How can you blaspheme if you don't believe in that which is
supposed to have been blasphemed against?


Salman Rushdie is alleged to have blasphemed when he wrote the Satanic Verses.

The cartoon that appeared in a Danish newspaper poking fun at
the prophet Mohammed is also alleged to be guilty of blasphemy.

But supposing someone believed ...[text shortened]... f blasphemy?

No one can prove the supernatural exists, so how could you blaspheme about it?

Those who blaspheme against God are still sinning against God, even if they do not believe in God or sin, and you will be called upon at Judgement to defend your decision to do so.

What is it any police officer will tell you? Oh, yeah, ignorance of the law is no excuse. And in this case, you're not even actually ignorant of it. You just choose to do so anyways.