20 Feb 09
Originally posted by ZahlanziActually it frightens me that you do.
are religious people moronic in nature?
yes.
is a black man or woman 2/3 of a real person?
yes.
you don't see any similarity between these two constructs? as in the obvious stupidity and bigotry and ignorance?
So tell me, what similarities do you see between a persons chosen behaviour
and that of their heritage?
20 Feb 09
Originally posted by ZahlanziYou do. You remind me of generalissimo. Chest puffed out. Your bossy little boots just a size too big. Resplendent in your earnest superfluity.
glad to provide entertainment for you.
On Topic Bit: Are religious folk moronic in nature? Now there's a question.
20 Feb 09
2 edits
Originally posted by FMFNa hes more like Ming the merciless, menacing arched eyebrows, scarlet cloak, ruby and diamond encrusted ring that we kiss on entering his presence while we make out petty petitions before his greatness, big pinball wizard boots, aint it so Zapansy dude!😉
You do. You remind me of generalissimo. Chest puffed out. Your bossy little boots just a size too big. Resplendent in your earnest superfluity.
On Topic Bit: Are religious folk moronic in nature? Now there's a question.
20 Feb 09
Originally posted by Thequ1cki had to read it twice before realizing what you mean. when i understood that you really do believe that religious people are moronic in nature, it became obvious why you don't see any similarities between those two concepts.
Actually it frightens me that you do.
So tell me, what similarities do you see between a persons chosen behaviour
and that of their heritage?
well let me break it down to you. they are both moronic because they both deal with misconceptions, bigotry, over generalization. like saying all blacks like kool aid and chikin or that they are less human than whites.
when you say that religious people are moronic in nature, do you have any proofs? do you have any logical reason to say all are moronic? so if only some are moronic, do you have any logical reason to assume that is because of religion and not because they were moronic to begin with?
20 Feb 09
Originally posted by Ed TWrong thread Ed T. This thread started out with name calling. Indeed, take a look at the Thread title. In fact, your well intentioned and intelligent post is the first one totally off-topic. Shape up or ship out, Mr Nice Guy.
Why is it that so many discussions start out well intentioned and intelligent and then somewhere along the way melt down into circular name calling?
20 Feb 09
Originally posted by ZahlanziJust to set the record straight (so to speak): Every gay man does in fact have an equisite sense of fashion!
[M]aking such a moronic claim is the same as making any other stereotype or hateful comment regarding a group of people.
like saying blacks like chicken, jews are greedy and every gay man has an exquisite sense of fashion. it is retarded.
20 Feb 09
Originally posted by FMFFeisty, i like that!
Wrong thread Ed T. This thread started out with name calling. Indeed, take a look at the [b]Thread title. In fact, your well intentioned and intelligent post is the first one totally off-topic. Shape up or ship out, Mr Nice Guy.[/b]
23 Feb 09
Originally posted by Ed Tthis discussion didn't start well intentioned and intelligent. it started with name calling. and unfounded name calling at that.
Why is it that so many discussions start out well intentioned and intelligent and then somewhere along the way melt down into circular name calling?
23 Feb 09
Originally posted by gaychessplayerand you claim this because you have met every single gay man on earth.
Just to set the record straight (so to speak): Every gay man does in fact have an equisite sense of fashion!
on the other hand, if you attempted a joke, it needs work.