I the green graph in the players profile showing the 300 last games, I think there is too much green.

I think that the vertical scale should reach from the minimum rating of the 300 last games, rather than the minimum rating of all the players games.

For example - look at the graph of User 51824. It is almost flat but the most of the green reaches all from 1190. It's way too much green in my taste.

But it's only a minor problem though...

I just clicked on the link and saw so much green I went colorblind.😕

i wish my graph had to much green 🙁

I'd like to be able to kinda zoom in. Sometimes people's graphs contain so many games you can't get into that much detail.

When I get that many games I'd like to look closer at the peaks and valleys so to speak.

Why not let us pick our color preferences for our graph. I would like to have fuschia and mauve.

Originally posted by coquette
Why not let us pick our color preferences for our graph. I would like to have fuschia and mauve.

i would like a pie graph instead...last 300 games...green for wins, yellow for ties and red for losses....an optional choice for a graph.

There is also the reversed problem. Too much white - in some instances. Like the User 280756.

So I suggest that the diagrams top should be the maximum rating for the last 300 games and the bottom should (in analogy) the minimum rating for the last 300 games.

If you see too much white - you're not colorblind. 😕

Agreed. Set the top and bottom of the graph at the high and low ratings for the period covered, in order to get maximum clarity for the movement of the graph.