Scam Sites

Scam Sites

Site Ideas

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Already mated

Omaha, Nebraska, USA

Joined
04 Jul 06
Moves
1115058
27 Aug 17

When an obvious scam spam site posts (see General Forum - Cheap flights), it would be helpful if subscribers in good standing could simply "RED BUTTON" it. That would temporarily block the entry until a moderator could check it out. Anyone who maliciously or recklessly hits that RED BUTTON (abuses it), then they would no longer be in good standing. This is just to protect our members and this site, itself.

Already mated

Omaha, Nebraska, USA

Joined
04 Jul 06
Moves
1115058
27 Aug 17

One additional suggestion that might be better: Don't allow a non-sub to start a forum thread until a minimum number of moves has been made, or even, possibly, a minimum of a few games.

Joined
09 Nov 06
Moves
0
27 Aug 17

Originally posted by @coquette
When an obvious scam spam site posts (see General Forum - Cheap flights), it would be helpful if subscribers in good standing could simply "RED BUTTON" it. That would temporarily block the entry until a moderator could check it out. Anyone who maliciously or recklessly hits that RED BUTTON (abuses it), then they would no longer be in good standing. This is just to protect our members and this site, itself.
Subscribers can alert the thread and when a Moderator comes online they can remove it - as i have done this morning. On the mod log 2 users alerted the post (you weren't one of them).

Couple of practical issues with your suggestion - which could be overcome

1. "subscribers in good standing" - define good standing. If some people are suggested then i can guarantee that someone would disagree with that.

2. Being unable to create a thread - we have in the past had genuine threads created by non-moving users in forums such as the help forum - your current suggestion would close this avenue for them.

Maybe a message on the forums saying be wary of clicking on links? Personally if i see a link i wouldnt click on it if it had nothing to do with chess at all.

Already mated

Omaha, Nebraska, USA

Joined
04 Jul 06
Moves
1115058
27 Aug 17

Originally posted by @forum-moderator
Subscribers can alert the thread and when a Moderator comes online they can remove it - as i have done this morning. On the mod log 2 users alerted the post (you weren't one of them).

Couple of practical issues with your suggestion - which could be overcome

1. "subscribers in good standing" - define good standing. If some people are suggeste ...[text shortened]... ks? Personally if i see a link i wouldnt click on it if it had nothing to do with chess at all.
Fair enough. Just thinking out loud. Trying to be helpful.

Secret RHP coder

on the payroll

Joined
26 Nov 04
Moves
155080
28 Aug 17

Are we at least using a captcha for new account signups?

chemist

Linkenheim

Joined
22 Apr 05
Moves
656142
16 Oct 17

Originally posted by @bigdoggproblem
Are we at least using a captcha for new account signups?
Probably not, given the occurence of those postings in the GF

chemist

Linkenheim

Joined
22 Apr 05
Moves
656142
04 Nov 17

Originally posted by @bigdoggproblem
Are we at least using a captcha for new account signups?
They should be introduced for sure.
Plus I renew the suggestion to give posting rights only after two logins...
New members should be made aware that they can contact greeters.

st johnstone

Joined
14 Nov 09
Moves
417324
04 Nov 17

Originally posted by @ponderable
They should be introduced for sure.
Plus I renew the suggestion to give posting rights only after two logins...
New members should be made aware that they can contact greeters.
Non subs should only be allowed to post in the help forums
Get rid of spam and most trolls instantly.

RHP Code Monkey

RHP HQ

Joined
21 Feb 01
Moves
2419
24 Nov 17

We should see a lot less of this now.

Thread 175124

RHP Code Monkey

RHP HQ

Joined
21 Feb 01
Moves
2419
24 Nov 17

Originally posted by @bigdoggproblem
Are we at least using a captcha for new account signups?
Without discussing this in detail publicly, for obvious reasons, captcha should not be necessary now, and I will make tweaks going forward to catch any new trends in spammy posts.

chemist

Linkenheim

Joined
22 Apr 05
Moves
656142
24 Nov 17

Originally posted by @russ
Without discussing this in detail publicly, for obvious reasons, captcha should not be necessary now, and I will make tweaks going forward to catch any new trends in spammy posts.
good News!

Already mated

Omaha, Nebraska, USA

Joined
04 Jul 06
Moves
1115058
26 Nov 17

Excellent! Thanks.

Australia

Joined
20 Jan 09
Moves
386355
27 Nov 17

Definitely seems to have worked. 🙂

RHP Code Monkey

RHP HQ

Joined
21 Feb 01
Moves
2419
27 Nov 17

Originally posted by @kewpie
Definitely seems to have worked. 🙂
I've had one feedback message from "gibsdocs" - "i am not a spammer please". Very convincing, as the message subject was trying to sell citizenship papers.

Already mated

Omaha, Nebraska, USA

Joined
04 Jul 06
Moves
1115058
08 Dec 17

So far, so good. The problem seems to have been solved until the invasive techniques evolve again.