Site Ideas
04 Mar 07
06 Mar 07
The post that was quoted here has been removedno, I thought about that and if you'd really wanted to help the site admin you'd tell them by PM or feedback and give them chance to fix it. If you wanted to look clever and/or screw up the forums for a while teh way to go about it would be to tell everyone publically before giving the admin chance to fix the vulnerability. I'm pretty sure Microsoft don't pay people to inform the world of vulnerabilities before them!
07 Mar 07
Originally posted by belgianfreakPeople like yourself aren't worth the time to talk to.
no, I thought about that and if you'd really wanted to help the site admin you'd tell them by PM or feedback and give them chance to fix it. If you wanted to look clever and/or screw up the forums for a while teh way to go about it would be to tell everyone publically before giving the admin chance to fix the vulnerability. I'm pretty sure Microsoft don't pay people to inform the world of vulnerabilities before them!
Bye RHP, and good riddance to you. At one time you were a decent site.
- Joined
- 10 Apr 03
- Moves
- 48786
07 Mar 07
Economic term for the day (and it's application here)
"Adverse Selection" in the production of "bads"...
Adverse Selection - The "bad" products, customers (or moderators) are more likely to be selected due to information asymmetries.
"Bads" - Is censorship a "good" or a "bad" - something that makes us worse off??
Do we have persons holding unbiased moderating positions who really have antithetical views concerning censorship?
Those with the "will to power" seek that power and delete those posts that do not tickle their palate.
07 Mar 07
Originally posted by Phillidor284What are you talking about? RHP is largely a self-moderating community.
Economic term for the day (and it's application here)
"Adverse Selection" in the production of "bads"...
Adverse Selection - The "bad" products, customers (or moderators) are more likely to be selected due to information asymmetries.
"Bads" - Is censorship a "good" or a "bad" - something that makes us worse off??
Do we have persons holding u ...[text shortened]... to power" seek that power and delete those posts that do not tickle their palate.
D
07 Mar 07
Originally posted by BigDoggProblem"I can't be bothered to talk to you any more" - usually said by someone who's realised that they have no argument to make, are wrong but don't want to admit it.
People like yourself aren't worth the time to talk to.
Bye RHP, and good riddance to you. At one time you were a decent site.
09 Mar 07
1 edit
Originally posted by XanthosNZYes, I can read. Thanks for your usual smart arsed answer anyhow. As if the TOS is uniformly enforced here! If it were, half your posts would be gone.
You acknowledge that RHP may not pre-screen Content, but that RHP shall have the right (but not the obligation) in their sole discretion to refuse or move any Content that is available via the Service. Without limiting the foregoing, RHP shall have the right to remove any Content that violates the TOS or is otherwise objectionable. You agree that you must ...[text shortened]... , including without limitation information in RHP forums, and in all other parts of the Service.
09 Mar 07
Originally posted by BigDoggProblemSo, let me get this straight... you're throwing this hissy fit, because a post you made which exploited a bug in the forums, which made lower posts unreadable, got removed?
Or by someone who realizes that the party they're addressing is too damn thick to understand.
Ha!
D
