19 Mar '20 15:42>
@metal-brain saidThe thread about relativity here exposes this as a huge lie.
I admit when I don't know something, it is often the most intelligent answer. I don't let my ego get in the way of reality.
@metal-brain saidThe thread about relativity here exposes this as a huge lie.
I admit when I don't know something, it is often the most intelligent answer. I don't let my ego get in the way of reality.
@deepthought saidLack of permanence indicates the first.
The word has three meanings. The first is a moment in time. The second is importance, something of great moment is something of great importance. The meaning in physics is derived from the second sense of moment.
https://www.lexico.com/definition/moment
@metal-brain saidBy your many angry arrogant delusionally ignorant massive opinionated idiotic layperson posts there, containing obviously false assertions to any expert on the relevant subject, clearly to us all non-morons contradicts your assertion of;
LOL!
How so?
@humy saidAd hominem attacks again? LOL! That is a clear sign of defeat to constantly resort to that again and again.
By your many angry arrogant delusionally ignorant massive opinionated idiotic layperson posts there, containing obviously false assertions to any expert on the relevant subject, clearly to us all non-morons contradicts your assertion of;
"I admit when I don't know something, it is often the most intelligent answer. I don't let my ego get in the way of reality." (your quote)
Th ...[text shortened]... r posts get is from you and you alone? If you say we are all convinced by your BS, explain that one.
@metal-brain saidFrom a couple of pages back:
Ad hominem attacks again? LOL! That is a clear sign of defeat to constantly resort to that again and again.
Name one obvious false assertion I have made. You cannot without lying.
You are a pathological liar.
The fact is nobody understands what causes magnetism. Electron spin is a popular theory, but that is all it is.
@deepthought saidI accept their is a consensus that accepts electron spin as the best theory for explaining magnetism. The problem is that nobody agrees what "spin" is. You asserted that spin was not really the electron spinning on it's axis and that it was a magnetic moment. You went from saying electrons spin to saying the magnetic moment causes spin. This is backwards.
From a couple of pages back:The fact is nobody understands what causes magnetism. Electron spin is a popular theory, but that is all it is.
I think most professional physicists would disagree with this statement. It is a false assertion, whether it counts as obviously false depends on what one regards as obvious. Maxwell produced his theory of electromag ...[text shortened]... ing magnetism than the intrinsic dipole moment of electrons and this is a consequence of their spin.
@metal-brain saidWhere did I say that the magnetic moment causes spin? The chain of explanation is from spin and charge to magnetic moment. All physicists agree on what spin is, it's just that the definition is mathematical. Particles exist in unitary representations of the Lorentz group and this gives us both the spin states and the matter/anti-matter states.
I accept their is a consensus that accepts electron spin as the best theory for explaining magnetism. The problem is that nobody agrees what "spin" is. You asserted that spin was not really the electron spinning on it's axis and that it was a magnetic moment. You went from saying electrons spin to saying the magnetic moment causes spin. This is backwards.
Does magnetis ...[text shortened]... e magnetism? You need to make up your mind if you want to avoid contradicting yourself. Which is it?
@metal-brain saidNo, no such problem exists. We accept and generally agree with how science defines spin, no problem. There is no big controversy over that; Only you have a problem with accepting how science defines it, not us. You are totally alone here with your ignorant opinions and assertions on science.
The problem is that nobody agrees what "spin" is.
@deepthought saidI don't enjoy repeating past posts, but it has become necessary.
Where did I say that the magnetic moment causes spin? The chain of explanation is from spin and charge to magnetic moment. All physicists agree on what spin is, it's just that the definition is mathematical. Particles exist in unitary representations of the Lorentz group and this gives us both the spin states and the matter/anti-matter states.
@humy saidGreat!
No, no such problem exists. We accept and generally agree with how science defines spin, no problem. There is no big controversy over that; Only you have a problem with accepting how science defines it, not us. You are totally alone here with your ignorant opinions and assertions on science.
@wolfgang59 saidI think gravity is the most complicated or unexplainable thing going.
What is the most complicated concept you know of?
Explain it simply to us.
Thanks.