18 Oct '19 09:24>1 edit
Removed by poster
@deepthought saidHere is the difference, and it is a big one! We think through problems, and we can calculate mathematical questions; we are self-generating these things owning all of it. When we come up with an answer right or wrong, we own our answers; they are what we came up with in the end.
It just follows the rules one's given it. The problem is that we're talking about these things as if they're algorithms in the traditional sense. The type of AI humy is talking about is something more like a brain simulation. A brain simulation would make these judgements in the same way a brain does.
@sonhouse saidThe bee knows what it is doing it is aware and alive, a computer is not, as I pointed out earlier there is more intelligence in a piss ant than a computer it has none. You project a great deal about what you think is going to occur in the future, to the point of ignoring what is in the present.
@KellyJay
The same could be said of the brain of a bee. You would have to admit it doesn't know how it knows to find a flower with nectar. So it takes more organization of larger numbers of brain cells to get to the point of self awareness like the great apes, not able to design tools only use a branch as one and so forth but it knows what it is doing and why.
I think the ...[text shortened]... s, such as humans not EVER being able to do what you think a god did in terms of human intelligence.
@kellyjay saidDefine what you mean by "aware". And "aware" of what? And how is whatever your meaning by "aware" such that an AI cannot be "aware"? You keep making assertions that are not only without evidence or premise but are also pretty vague and badly worded.
The bee knows what it is doing it is aware
@humy saidAware is a matter of understanding, there is no understanding in a computer before a problem is presented to a computer, during a calculation within a computer as it is solving what we put to it, or after the calculation is completed with a correct or incorrect answer, the computer remains the same there is no understanding where it becomes aware of something new.
Define what you mean by "aware". And "aware" of what? And how is whatever your meaning by "aware" such that an AI cannot be "aware"? You keep making assertions that are not only without evidence or premise but are also pretty vague and badly worded.
@kellyjay saidDon't know what that's supposed to mean.
Aware is a matter of understanding,
@humy saidI think you are purposely ignorant now, a state of awareness on my part about you and your argument, or I see what you mean.
Don't know what that's supposed to mean.
Define what YOU mean by "aware" and "understanding"...
@kellyjay saidI am an AI EXPERT and with AI university qualifications + years of experience doing actual AI research and still doing AI research. You are not. Its YOU who are ignorant about AI and what they can do, not me; And by choice and I can only assume because you think the truth offends your religion, which is why you don't listen to the experts when they say something you don't want to be true.
I think you are purposely ignorant now,
@humy saidIf there is something about my religion you think I've been injecting bring it up. I've been speaking about a object we build that you have assigned traits to that do not belong. I don't care what your occupation or degrees are, they don't alter the fact that you can be right or wrong, and in this case your wrong.
I am an AI EXPERT and with AI university qualifications + years of experience doing actual AI research and still doing AI research. You are not. Its YOU who are ignorant about AI and what they can do, not me; And by choice and I can only assume because you think the truth offends your religion, which is why you don't listen to the experts when they say something you don't want to be true.
@kellyjay saidSo you assume you know better about a subject than the experts on that subject?
I don't care what your occupation or degrees are,
@sonhouse said
@KellyJay
The same could be said of the brain of a bee. You would have to admit it doesn't know how it knows to find a flower with nectar. So it takes more organization of larger numbers of brain cells to get to the point of self awareness like the great apes, not able to design tools only use a branch as one and so forth but it knows what it is doing and why.
I think the ...[text shortened]... s, such as humans not EVER being able to do what you think a god did in terms of human intelligence.
...I think quantum computers will be matched to classical computers of the future so they WILL become self aware.
I think generally people underestimate the capability of AI. They sort of think like it’s a smart human.
“But it’s really going to be much more than that. It’ll be much smarter than the average human.
“It’ll be like, can a chimpanzee really understand humans? Not really, you know, we just seem like strange aliens. They mostly just care about other chimpanzees.
“And how it is more or less and if the difference is only that small, that would be amazing. Probably, it’s much greater." - Elon Musk
@wildgrass saidWhat is a self-aware computer?...I think quantum computers will be matched to classical computers of the future so they WILL become self aware.
I think this is where critics like Musk are raising alarms. Computational self awareness is a problem if you're a human, especially if we want them thinking like us. Humans have made some terrrrrrible decisions throughout history, justified in ...[text shortened]... ference is only that small, that would be amazing. Probably, it’s much greater." - Elon Musk[/quote]