1. Joined
    06 Mar '12
    Moves
    642
    20 Jul '12 11:53
    Originally posted by sonhouse
    You have an imagination for sure. It seems to me however you need to go to school and complete your education in science so you don't keep going off the deep end.

    Like Hu says, what would generate current on Mars? There is only spotty magnetic fields there, no global field like on Earth which could generate some kind of electrical flow but the main thing ...[text shortened]... units. All pure speculation but our form of DNA I would bet is not the only way to make life.
    Is life there based on DNA, if not what?

    I may be wrong but my best personal educated guess is that alien life most likely would not have DNA genes but would have genes based on a complex molecule quite similar but not completely identical to DNA.
    The bases of this educated guess is the fact that the best hypothesis to date of how life first formed on Earth is that the first protocell almost inevitably must have been RNA based ( because RNA spontaneously forms prior to any photocell ) and with no DNA but then DNA evolved later from RNA so my current hypothesis is that virtually all alien protocells at least start with being RNA based but then later evolution takes over and that less-than-ideal RNA evolves into a better DNA-like molecule but, because there are a vast number of subtle variations on DNA, exactly which variant of DNA evolves is down to chance.

    I am also making the assumption here that whatever the chemical building blocks life starts with, life generally sticks with or only makes miner changes to them because I also have the hypothesis that it is very difficult for evolution to change or modify the basic building blocks life. Hence my assumption that RNA would not evolve into something completely different from either RNA or DNA but could instead only evolve into something very similar.
  2. Subscribersonhouse
    Fast and Curious
    slatington, pa, usa
    Joined
    28 Dec '04
    Moves
    53223
    20 Jul '12 12:29
    Originally posted by humy
    Is life there based on DNA, if not what?

    I may be wrong but my best personal educated guess is that alien life most likely would not have DNA genes but would have genes based on a complex molecule quite similar but not completely identical to DNA.
    The bases of this educated guess is the fact that the best hypothesis to date of how life first ...[text shortened]... tely different from either RNA or DNA but could instead only evolve into something very similar.
    I think it depends on the energy conditions of an alien planet, for instance, suppose a planet forms where there is a lot of water and a lot of storms with a lot of lightning and therefore a lot of molecular shuffling around over eons of time.

    RNA could prove to be only one of a lot of variants that would lead to DNA like structures and could make structures like I talked about, instead of a twisted ladder like our DNA, it could be an enclosed triangular affair or enclosed box.

    Time will tell, eh.
  3. Joined
    06 Mar '12
    Moves
    642
    20 Jul '12 13:19
    Originally posted by sonhouse
    I think it depends on the energy conditions of an alien planet, for instance, suppose a planet forms where there is a lot of water and a lot of storms with a lot of lightning and therefore a lot of molecular shuffling around over eons of time.

    RNA could prove to be only one of a lot of variants that would lead to DNA like structures and could make struct ...[text shortened]... like our DNA, it could be an enclosed triangular affair or enclosed box.

    Time will tell, eh.
    Time will tell, eh.


    Yes, we will just have to wait to see how that one end up in the next few weeks.
  4. Subscribersonhouse
    Fast and Curious
    slatington, pa, usa
    Joined
    28 Dec '04
    Moves
    53223
    21 Jul '12 00:45
    Originally posted by humy
    Time will tell, eh.


    Yes, we will just have to wait to see how that one end up in the next few weeks.
    I don't think the next few weeks will do it, maybe the next few decades...The thing has to undergo those ten minutes of terror landing, never been done trick.
  5. Joined
    29 Mar '09
    Moves
    816
    13 Aug '12 04:01
    Originally posted by sonhouse
    I would imagine at some depth if there was ice there would be liquid water also, maybe even underground rivers.
    I used to cast bronze artwork. We would sometimes cast solid pieces. The solid pieces would cool on the outside first and would have enlarged grain structure and voids in the middle. Could it be that mars has cooled enough that the center has voids and the water that was once on the surface has trickled to the interior?
  6. Joined
    18 Jan '07
    Moves
    12459
    13 Aug '12 10:49
    Originally posted by joe beyser
    I used to cast bronze artwork. We would sometimes cast solid pieces. The solid pieces would cool on the outside first and would have enlarged grain structure and voids in the middle. Could it be that mars has cooled enough that the center has voids and the water that was once on the surface has trickled to the interior?
    Erm... unlike bronze (unlike most other materials, in fact), water expands when it freezes...

    Richard
  7. Subscribersonhouse
    Fast and Curious
    slatington, pa, usa
    Joined
    28 Dec '04
    Moves
    53223
    13 Aug '12 15:402 edits
    Originally posted by Shallow Blue
    Erm... unlike bronze (unlike most other materials, in fact), water expands when it freezes...

    Richard
    Still, it is pretty well accepted there is water ice under the surface. Just how much has to be sussed out but it is there, proven. I imagine when surface water started evaporating, the atmosphere itself was deteriorating at the same time so they bootstrapped together to make for a dry planet. Dry on the surface, that is.

    The biggest problem was no magnetic shield to keep out solar storms and such, ionizing the upper atmosphere and then out into space on a continuous basis.

    My guess: 90% of the water went up and out and 10% went underground. My guess only.
  8. Cape Town
    Joined
    14 Apr '05
    Moves
    52945
    13 Aug '12 16:25
    Originally posted by sonhouse
    The biggest problem was no magnetic shield to keep out solar storms and such, ionizing the upper atmosphere and then out into space on a continuous basis.
    Wikipedia lists more possible causes:


    Possible causes for the depletion of a previously thicker Martian atmosphere include:
    Catastrophic collision by a body large enough to blow away a significant percentage of the atmosphere;[8]
    Gradual erosion of the atmosphere by solar wind;[9] and
    On-going removal of atmosphere due to electromagnetic field and solar wind interaction.[8]
    Mars's low gravity allowed the atmosphere to "blow off" into space by gas-kinetic escape. [10]
  9. Standard memberThequ1ck
    Fast above
    Slow Below
    Joined
    29 Sep '03
    Moves
    25914
    14 Aug '12 00:351 edit
    Originally posted by sonhouse
    I think it depends on the energy conditions of an alien planet, for instance, suppose a planet forms where there is a lot of water and a lot of storms with a lot of lightning and therefore a lot of molecular shuffling around over eons of time.

    RNA could prove to be only one of a lot of variants that would lead to DNA like structures and could make struct ...[text shortened]... like our DNA, it could be an enclosed triangular affair or enclosed box.

    Time will tell, eh.
    To my understanding it is the moon (amongst other things) which makes Earth
    so unique.

    There is a theory upon how another object, (approximately the size of mars) collided
    with the earth some billions of years ago and left a satellite fragment.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Giant_impact_hypothesis

    What is so important about this collision is how the impact left deep ridges and
    grooves upon the Earth's crust which allowed for the containment of surface water.
  10. Subscribersonhouse
    Fast and Curious
    slatington, pa, usa
    Joined
    28 Dec '04
    Moves
    53223
    14 Aug '12 00:38
    Originally posted by twhitehead
    Wikipedia lists more possible causes:


    Possible causes for the depletion of a previously thicker Martian atmosphere include:
    Catastrophic collision by a body large enough to blow away a significant percentage of the atmosphere;[8]
    Gradual erosion of the atmosphere by solar wind;[9] and
    On-going removal of atmosphere due to electromagnetic fi ...[text shortened]... w gravity allowed the atmosphere to "blow off" into space by gas-kinetic escape. [10]
    That last is one of the biggest problems on Mars, coupled with the lack of magnetic field, or perhaps the extinction of an existing magnetic field. It just didn't have the mass of Earth or Venus on which to hold an atmosphere gravitationally, the ions in the upper atmosphere would have had greater than escape velocity simply through interaction with the solar wind. If it had a magnetic field as strong as Earth's, it would have been able to retain a LOT more atmosphere. The gravity on Mars is barely twice that of our moon, like 1/3 of Earth so ions that would be more or less forever trapped by Earth or what you see on Venus, those same ions zipping around would have had a velocity greater than the escape velocity of Mars.

    Personally I don't think Mars was hit by something so massive it destroyed the atmosphere, I think it was just its small mass coupled with no magnetic shield doomed the place.

    It is interesting, the concept that life could have begun on Mars and some asteroid impact blowing off enough rock with bacteria in it to have made it all the way across space which would have taken millions of years and the meteorite crashing into a young Earth and starting life out here like that, so if that were true, we would all be Martians.

    If later explorers find life on Mars, the tale will be told in the kind of life it is, would it be based on DNA like ours or something completely different. If it was based on DNA, that would suggest a deep connection between life on Earth and life on Mars.

    If not, the field would be blown wide open, say if the DNA equivalent was shaped like a twisting cube instead of our twisting ladder.
  11. Joined
    29 Mar '09
    Moves
    816
    14 Aug '12 01:53
    Originally posted by Shallow Blue
    Erm... unlike bronze (unlike most other materials, in fact), water expands when it freezes...

    Richard
    I was speaking of the magma cooling. Mars having much less mass than earth and being in a more distant orbit from the sun, the interior should have cooled faster. If there was shrinkage of that material causing voids at a time there was liquid water on the surface, maybe it trickled down before the surface got too cold. Hard to think the water would have drifted into space unless gravity stopped. We do get mars rocks on earth because of meteor blasts and the solar wind may wisk some away but not all of it.
  12. Cape Town
    Joined
    14 Apr '05
    Moves
    52945
    14 Aug '12 09:58
    Originally posted by joe beyser
    If there was shrinkage of that material causing voids at a time there was liquid water on the surface, maybe it trickled down before the surface got too cold.
    Water itself often causes cavities in rock as some rocks are soluble.

    Hard to think the water would have drifted into space unless gravity stopped. We do get mars rocks on earth because of meteor blasts and the solar wind may wisk some away but not all of it.
    As sonhouse points out, the gravity is simply not strong enough to hold on to it. We are talking about water vapour in the atmosphere, not liquid surface water.
  13. Joined
    29 Mar '09
    Moves
    816
    14 Aug '12 10:58
    Originally posted by twhitehead
    Water itself often causes cavities in rock as some rocks are soluble.

    [b]Hard to think the water would have drifted into space unless gravity stopped. We do get mars rocks on earth because of meteor blasts and the solar wind may wisk some away but not all of it.

    As sonhouse points out, the gravity is simply not strong enough to hold on to it. We are talking about water vapour in the atmosphere, not liquid surface water.[/b]
    So gravity on mars can hold onto CO2 but not water vapor? CO2 is heavier than water vapor and a lower pressure will cause water to vaporize at a lower temp, but still hard to believe it all left the planet. A comet has enough gravity to hold onto its vapors even though it trails out.
  14. Standard memberThequ1ck
    Fast above
    Slow Below
    Joined
    29 Sep '03
    Moves
    25914
    14 Aug '12 20:003 edits
    Originally posted by Thequ1ck
    To my understanding it is the moon (amongst other things) which makes Earth
    so unique.

    There is a theory upon how another object, (approximately the size of mars) collided
    with the earth some billions of years ago and left a satellite fragment.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Giant_impact_hypothesis

    What is so important about this collision is how ...[text shortened]... ridges and
    grooves upon the Earth's crust which allowed for the containment of surface water.
    Correction to previous post. Grooves in Earth's crust allow us to have land, not contain surface water.

    When you add this on to the HUGE probabilities of distance from sun etc that allow
    for life. The odds are...well....astronomical!

    With this in mind, it has to be pretty pointless looking for life similar to our own.
  15. Standard memberAThousandYoung
    Insanity at Masada
    tinyurl.com/mw7txe34
    Joined
    23 Aug '04
    Moves
    26660
    14 Aug '12 20:07
    Looks like you've found the God of War's bumhole.
Back to Top

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.I Agree